jekelish
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 22,278
- Like
- 36,915
Yeah, it's a peeve, but let's be honest...what's more important, the fact that he swapped the S and the U, or the fact that he chose the S and the U?Good Ole U of S smh
Yeah, it's a peeve, but let's be honest...what's more important, the fact that he swapped the S and the U, or the fact that he chose the S and the U?Good Ole U of S smh
I'm just gonna say what we're all thinking: I really hope that Wisconsin doesn't come sniffing around.
Agreed. Though I would like to see a DT or two also.Seems like this class will be really solid with RW44 and Rex as the stars. Adding Moe or a stud WR would be sweet.
But overall there isn't a kid I don't like.
Yup - just as long as he doesn't swap the U of S for the U of WYeah, it's a peeve, but let's be honest...what's more important, the fact that he swapped the S and the U, or the fact that he chose the S and the U?
Yup. OL is the unit with the greatest chance of a 3 star becoming all-league.Nice. I'm a believer in 3 star OL.
Hmm maybe if he's a good character guy we could reach out to the brother for a preferred walk on transfer and let him earn a schollie of he's talented and a team playerHis older brother (HS class of 2013) was a TE at NIU. He's no longer on the roster and doesn't appear in their directory. If he was still at NIU it could have led to a different commitment from Sam.
My stance on OL is always this: how many guys with good frames and some athleticism can you sign? Numbers are far more important than stars, IMO, b/c it's difficult to project the position and you always need at least 8 guys that can play. It's really hard -- outside of maybe a few elites -- to continually grab Adam Terrys and Justin Pughs. I feel like it's a little different at other positions for some reason.Nice. I'm a believer in 3 star OL.
I'd like to test this some time, but I think stars can really matter when it comes to OL, ie there's an accumulation affect, like OL performance is consistently good if across the 5 OL spots there's a total of 14 stars, and OLs are really good if across the 5 spots they have 17+ or something like that. I get what you're saying, and it's similar to centers in basketball, but I feel better about signing the big guys that are rated more highly than not.My stance on OL is always this: how many guys with good frames and some athleticism can you sign? Numbers are far more important than stars, IMO, b/c it's difficult to project the position and you always need at least 8 guys that can play. It's really hard -- outside of maybe a few elites -- to continually grab Adam Terrys and Justin Pughs. I feel like it's a little different at other positions for some reason.
I'd like to test this some time, but I think stars can really matter when it comes to OL, ie there's an accumulation affect, like OL performance is consistently good if across the 5 OL spots there's a total of 14 stars, and OLs are really good if across the 5 spots they have 17+ or something like that. I get what you're saying, and it's similar to centers in basketball, but I feel better about signing the big guys that are rated more highly than not.
Which is partly why I'd like to test this more widely. We're just one case in the sample.I'm pretty sure historically our best lineman have been the more lightly recruited kids.
Why do you worry on every commit we have for being a flip? Be and stay positive!!!!! That's two today in about an half hour apart.I could this being a flip down the road so I won't feel comfortable until the ink dries.
Even northwestern could decide they 'have room'
Why do you worry on every commit we have for being a flip? Be and stay positive!!!!! That's two today in about an half hour apart.
Name one program that has never had a flip? Besides I bet the vast majority of any program's commits stay committed to that program. I love our odds all the time.
If they flip so be it.