cuseallday
All Conference
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2020
- Messages
- 2,015
- Like
- 9,829
Strong game for Donnie - beat Boogie Fland!
IMG played Don Bosco Prep, my friend. Another good game for Donnie. Jordan Smith Jr. and Anthony Brown (PVI) played and beat Link, while the 9 pm game saw Montverde beat LuHi (Kiyan Anthony/Nigel James) for the CoP title...Kiyan had 14 pts against Montverde, the No. 1 team in the country!!!Is IMG playing against Montrose tonight at 9 on espnu? I think they are. Maybe not.
I have only seen a few clips. He’s our next “Syracuse forward” and all that term represents: good shooter, rebounds, good handle, willing and able passer, etc.For those interested in a more analytical breakdown from a couple of Donnies recent games, there are some really good nuggets about Freeman in this article from an NBA draft analyst with theswishtheory:
Scouting the 2023 Sunshine Classic | Swish Theory
Some highlights:
"Donnie Freeman, Acuff’s teammate, got plenty of buckets of his own for IMG, flashing all of the developable ball skills, good feel decision-making, and impressive timing for someone with legitimate NBA size, wingspan, and two-way impact. Prospects with the height and length to defend multiple frontcourt positions who show capability in every offensive area, who don’t hurt their team on either end, who flash on-ball self-creator upside tend to be the most coveted prospect types by pro teams."
"
#10 Donavan (Donnie) Freeman, 6’9″ Forward, IMG Academy
vs. Montverde
20 PTS
9 REB
3 AST
4 STL + 1 BLK
8/16 FG – 3/4 FT
(27 MIN)
vs. Brewster
16 PTS
12 REB
3 AST / 3 TO
3 STL + 1 BLK
6/8 FG – 2/3 3P
(31 MIN)
6’9″ forwards with grab-and-go mentality, realistically developable dribble-pass-shoot ball skills, and good two-way feel don’t grow on trees; Donnie Freeman makes winning plays on both ends with intriguing scoring creator potential on the ball.
Talents as promising as this tend to be some of the most coveted prospect types in the draft, like Devin Vassell or Mikal Bridges, players who have nearly every tool at their disposal. The development of these prospect types depends on the situation they end up in, like water bending to the glass that holds it or turtles only growing as big as their bowl lets them
Freeman posted the highest overall impact of the event with 12.5 C-RAM, along with off-the-charts defensive output of 110 DSI after racking up 7 steals and 2 blocks over a 2-game stretch. Donavan’s scoring effectiveness is noted in his 87 PSP rating as an individual scorer, 78 3PEfficiency rating as a floor-stretching forward, and 83 ATR as a rim finisher in the paint.
Not enough film was taken of Donavan Freeman, a legitimate NBA prospect with bankable aspects to his game that should translate to every level he reaches going forward.
It’s not every day a prospect as tall as Donnie can create his own shot, dribble on the drive, finish at the rim, stretch the floor from deep, and use his height and length effectively to be an absolutely disruptive defender.
Against Brewster, Donnie Freeman showed smooth scoring chops along with dribble pass skills, notable for his height, featuring a mean stutter rip drive and dribble drive rim-finishing capabilties.
"
Theres more in the article so definitely worth checking out if interested, id recommend searching for Donnies name specifically as its quite long to read through the entire article.
Swipe for video...
My comparison would be a slightly more offensive oriented Elton Brand.The first person I think of in recent hoops for a comparison is Kevin Knox.
The ”classic Syracuse forward” is DC, BillyNewO, Wallace, Hak, and Carmelo.Donnie is not the 'classic Syracuse forward'. He is considerably better than that
The classic Syracuse forward, is DC, Billy Owens, John Wallace, and Melo.Donnie is not the 'classic Syracuse forward'. He is considerably better than that
That would awesome if he was better than top 3 in the draft.Donnie is not the 'classic Syracuse forward'. He is considerably better than that
Those players are all remarkably differentThe classic Syracuse forward, is DC, Billy Owens, John Wallace, and Melo.
Let's wait and see if he is half as good before we elevate him as a star.
Not trying to be argumentative, but I would like to understand your definition of 'classic Syracuse forward'?Donnie is not the 'classic Syracuse forward'. He is considerably better than that
I don't understand the grouping of those players. What unifies those players other than they were good (and some much better than others). Coleman is an extremely different player than Wes Johnson or Joseph, for example.Not trying to be argumentative, but I would like to understand your definition of 'classic Syracuse forward'?
Mine is an inside-outside, versatile forward that can score in a variety of ways.
Carmelo, DC, Owens, Wes Johnson, Kris Joseph, CJ Fair, John Wallace. All 6-7 and up, all could dribble enough for their size and do the things above. That's my prototype SU forward.
Jerami Grant & Hakim Warrick were not classic SU forwards but they still had multiple ways they could do damage, too.
I might put Freeman into a mix of both groups. He'd do well to be in this company. I think he will be soon enough.
I already gave my criteria. Versatility is the key for both of us. Freeman fits that criteria. All of those guys are that. They can score in a variety of ways. And they can all create their own shot.I don't understand the grouping of those players. What unifies those players other than they were good (and some much better than others). Coleman is an extremely different player than Wes Johnson or Joseph, for example.
My definition is long, athletic, versatile. I wouldn't describe Coleman or Melo as classic Syracuse forwards, they are much more than that
Coleman and Owens established the definition of classic SU forward. They were both do it all players. Others have followed in similar molds but not all to the same caliber as the first two. Probably only Melo lives up to that original standard with Wallace being close as a senior.I don't understand the grouping of those players. What unifies those players other than they were good (and some much better than others). Coleman is an extremely different player than Wes Johnson or Joseph, for example.
My definition is long, athletic, versatile. I wouldn't describe Coleman or Melo as classic Syracuse forwards, they are much more than that
We've never had a player like DC or Melo ever again. Not even close. Not just in overall ability but skillset, play style, etc. Don't understand how they could be described as classic mold of Syracuse forwards for that reasonColeman and Owens established the definition of classic SU forward. They were both do it all players. Others have followed in similar molds but not all to the same caliber as the first two. Probably only Melo lives up to that original standard with Wallace being close as a senior.
Differentiating between Coleman and Wes Johnson is splitting hairs? They are night and day different players.I already gave my criteria. Versatility is the key for both of us. Freeman fits that criteria. All of those guys are that. They can score in a variety of ways. And they can all create their own shot.
Warrick developed that over time, but Grant did not while at SU.
Not sure why you're splitting hairs. SU forwards are versatile. Whether they're "much more than that" or not, I think that's what most people are saying when they say "classic SU forward".
You're confusing level of talent with style of play. We have had lots of forwards that have played inside and outside, rebounded, and played solid defense. If you haven't seen that in other guys, you weren't watching.We've never had a player like DC or Melo ever again. Not even close. Not just in overall ability but skillset, play style, etc. Don't understand how they could be described as classic mold of Syracuse forwards for that reason