squeeze your nose as you drink the stuff. No taste.
Thank Goodness he wasn't a Penn State grad.My last one , the Dr was a former Jawhawk basketball player from when I was in school. He was a double figure scorer for 3 years. I mentioned our notable wins against Kansas before the procedure. probably not that smart on my part seeing how he was about to go to work on me.
We take two from that group for sure. The question is, would two of them commit, would Taylor and Lands already in the fold, will both also projected to play on the wing?I assume we are willing to take 2 of the 3 between Copeland, Starling and Westry. It seems Copeland looks likely and Westry looks unlikely. If UNC is out on JJ does that make us the favorite?
I think Taylor can play the wing - I also think Copeland has the potential too.We take two from that group for sure. The question is, would two of them commit, would Taylor and Lands already in the fold, will both also projected to play on the wing?
I think you might be correct. The Orange staff might not be able to wait for him. They will impress that upon him this weekend.I dont think JJ commits this weekend. Could be wrong and I'd love to be but I think he takes his visits and gets through Peach Jam before figuring out what he wants to do.
It would be huge to get him to commit before leaving...like really huge! Maybe he does knowing Copeland might pull the trigger and Chance's LSU visit will be over and there's the possibility of him committing as well. Don't think it happens but like you said, I'm sure the staff is letting him know the situation.I think you might be correct. The Orange staff might not be able to wait for him. They will impress that upon him this weekend.
I just find it hard to believe JJ would commit to an SU team that would already have Taylor & Copeland. Especially with Lands already committed. Where is his path to playing time?
Can't help feeling that it is JJ or Copeland, and the coaches may have warned him that they will take Copeland, so it will be whoever commits first.
There will be a path to playing time regardless of who is on the roster. JJ is that good.I just find it hard to believe JJ would commit to an SU team that would already have Taylor & Copeland. Especially with Lands already committed. Where is his path to playing time?
Can't help feeling that it is JJ or Copeland, and the coaches may have warned him that they will take Copeland, so it will be whoever commits first.
It depends on the pitch.I just find it hard to believe JJ would commit to an SU team that would already have Taylor & Copeland. Especially with Lands already committed. Where is his path to playing time?
Can't help feeling that it is JJ or Copeland, and the coaches may have warned him that they will take Copeland, so it will be whoever commits first.
I think (could be wrong) that playing the 2 on offense is the important thing. As long a we play 3 or 4 out, and label them both as guards it shouldn’t matterYeah I don't see Taylor playing the 3 at Cuse. Just because he can, doesn't mean he wants to. With Lands also wanting time at the 2 I just don't see us taking two out of three of the other guys. I think they see if JJ is willing to commit. If he doesn't Syracuse grabs Copeland. I think Taylor helps net us Flip and then we add Bunch. Final tally...
Copeland
Taylor
Flip
Bunch
Surprise 5th: Taylor's PF buddy we offered a few months back.
It doesn't really matter on offense. JB can and does feature players based on their skill set and not necessarily their position or label. Having a true PG and a true 5 on offense is what matters most, IMO.I think (could be wrong) that playing the 2 on offense is the important thing. As long a we play 3 or 4 out, and label them both as guards it shouldn’t matter
Possibly but my guess would be that Taylor would be more comfortable at the top of the zone at 6'7. Putting a 6'7 Taylor with a 6'8 Copeland or a 6'7 Land would just be filthy. Teams won't have a clean 3 inside 30 feet. Add Benny and Flip with Edwards and Frank and the middle and it becomes stupid filthy.I think (could be wrong) that playing the 2 on offense is the important thing. As long a we play 3 or 4 out, and label them both as guards it shouldn’t matter
Length at the top of the zone is an asset for sure. Length AND quickness AND anticipation is what makes the top of the zone special. We know all these guys have length (even though I don't think Cope is even close to 6-8). We won't know about the other stuff until they play.Possibly but my guess would be that Taylor would be more comfortable at the top of the zone at 6'7. Putting a 6'7 Taylor with a 6'8 Copeland or a 6'7 Land would just be filthy. Teams won't have a clean 3 inside 30 feet. Add Benny and Flip with Edwards and Frank and the middle and it becomes stupid filthy.