orangefog
Certified Message Board Genius
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,603
- Like
- 60,928
Hopefully our late interest doesn't hurt us too much. We SHOULD be able to beat out both those teams.Wake and Cincy are the teams to beat right now
Hopefully our late interest doesn't hurt us too much. We SHOULD be able to beat out both those teams.Wake and Cincy are the teams to beat right now
Uphill climb, but a good story and amazing recruiting pitch to sell this semi-local kid.Hopefully our late interest doesn't hurt us too much. We SHOULD be able to beat out both those teams.
Red can close on Tillery and we will land him, Kiyan and hopefull Abaev. That is a CLASS. Add to that some portal talent and we are rolling!!!!Uphill climb, but a good story and amazing recruiting pitch to sell this semi-local kid.
So where did you get that info from?Visit coming soon
Come on man, don't do that. I believe Cardiac has been pretty reliable. Just absorb the information and process accordingly.So where did you get that info from?
He's getting it from a paid service/source and that's a no-no to posting paid content on a message board. The admins know that Tom E. can get into trouble if that person/company want to pursue it.Come on man, don't do that. I believe Cardiac has been pretty reliable. Just absorb the information and process accordingly.
He didn't credit any source. So, all is good. I appreciate the info.He's getting it from a paid service/source and that's a no-no to posting paid content on a message board. The admins know that Tom E. can get into trouble if that person/company want to pursue it.
I agree, but I know for a fact he's getting it from a paid source/company which is a no-no.He didn't credit any source. So, all is good. I appreciate the info.
Copying and pasting is a no-no, the intellectual property is debatable. But, how are you going to tell someone that they can't share what they've learned from knowledge they have paid for? I appreciate his information and I believe he has shared it without compromising any perceived proprietary understanding.I agree, but I know for a fact he's getting it from a paid source/company which is a no-no.
Yes, but why would you post information that is privy and paid for. You do no service except it makes you look good and discredits the company/person that obtained all the paid content.Copying and pasting is a no-no, the intellectual property is debatable. But, how are you going to tell someone that they can't share what they've learned from knowledge they have paid for? I appreciate his information and I believe he has shared it without compromising any perceived proprietary understanding.
I don't know, I will never pay for such content, it doesn't mean that much to me. But, I do appreciate when people share their knowledge, no matter how they've accrued such content. Some have connections, some acquire their knowledge through subscriptions. But, as long as they don't quote those sources, it works for me.Yes, but why would you post information that is privy and paid for. You do no service except it makes you look good and discredits the company/person that obtained all the paid content.
Unless information involves Enterprise rental cars and potential coaches, you can assume people have good sources.So where did you get that info from?
Vast majority of us appreciate the info. You are welcome to ignore.Yes, but why would you post information that is privy and paid for. You do no service except it makes you look good and discredits the company/person that obtained all the paid content.
So the implication was that the “paid source” is the only person that knew about the visit? It’s not possible he got his information from a different source?Yes, but why would you post information that is privy and paid for. You do no service except it makes you look good and discredits the company/person that obtained all the paid content.
Said poster gave himself away in the paid sources messages.So the implication was that the “paid source” is the only person that knew about the visit? It’s not possible he got his information from a different source?
The staff obviously felt that Acaden Lewis was the better player. IMO, they were, and still are, correct.Should Red have prioritized both Acaden and Tillery and just waited to see how each played out? What was the reason for prioritizing Acaden?
Sometimes you don't have a chance to get the guy unless you make it clear you prioritize the guy.I just hope that Red isn’t making the same mistakes that JB used to make in his later years. Should Red have prioritized both Acaden and Tillery and just waited to see how each played out? What was the reason for prioritizing Acaden?
I don’t know how clued in Dean is to Tillery’s recruitment, tbh. When I’ve listened to his pods on this topic, some of it simply sounds like informed speculation. I had heard from someone else that Tillery just wasn’t that interested in us. But this late push makes me wonder what’s accurate. I think for a lot of these recruitments, the real stories don’t always come out until later, or each side has a different perspective.
There’s multiple of us who said we liked Tillery more, wayyyy before we were out on Lewis too bot ofc there will be people who say we’re saying that because we missed out on Lewis.Lewis might be a better pro prospect.
That doesn't make him "better."
Like Tillery more, and that's just my opinion based upon what I've seen comparing their games.
Uphill climb, but a good story and amazing recruiting pitch to sell this semi-local kid.
Commie bastard"You were not the first choice. But you are the last one and the right one." - President Bartlet on The West Wing
- Red Autry to Tillery
(Please, God, no one make this political, I'm quoting Sorkin just to make the point because I remembered it off hand. There is no liberal/conservative/alien agenda. My agenda is getting Tillery and improving our True Shooting percentages by lobbying for us to get Frost and Abaev with him)