Dino's signature? Jb had the 2-3, George DeLeon the freeze option. Watershed moment!Makes you wonder if the triple option, with the right talent, is sustainable in the ACC.
Win 4 OOC games, and a minimum of two conference games, probably more. Never get blown out because you’d be controlling the clock. Sign me up.
It legitimately does not make me wonder, even a little bit.Makes you wonder if the triple option, with the right talent, is sustainable in the ACC.
If the goal is 6-6/ 7-5 type seasons, it would work imo.It legitimately does not make me wonder, even a little bit.
That’s what everyone says our ceiling is.If the goal is 6-6/ 7-5 type seasons, it would work imo.
Our ceiling is higher than that for sure but I would be very content to accept it as the minimum.That’s what everyone says our ceiling is.
For all you brilliant analysts downgrading what we did against this horrible team. They couldn’t stop us even when they knew what was coming.
I don’t know what’s more funny - the fact that we ran the same play over and over in a one dimensional offense and Pitt couldn’t stop it, or people using this cluster of a game as a means to defend Dino.Remember that one time against BC they ran it down our throats even when we knew what was coming. Good times.
Sort of wonder where this OL run blocking has been all season?
We will probably find out in the next two weeks whether this is correct or not.Great win for the kids and I thought it was a fun game, but let's face it: resorting to these tactics to beat this Pitt team is a reflection of the deep issues facing the program. It's not going to work as well when teams have a chance to scheme against it, even when those teams are some of the ACC weaklings.
We lose to Pitt way too much historically it’s a nice win when you can pull better QBs out of the stands than the guys we have healthy like CDRW and Davis.Great win for the kids and I thought it was a fun game, but let's face it: resorting to these tactics to beat this Pitt team is a reflection of the deep issues facing the program. It's not going to work as well when teams have a chance to scheme against it, even when those teams are some of the ACC weaklings.
I don’t know what’s more funny - the fact that we ran the same play over and over in a one dimensional offense and Pitt couldn’t stop it, or people using this cluster of a game as a means to defend Dino.
Unreal, but expected.
I suppose I got what I wanted. Beck continuing to run a play that was working.
Truly funny to watch that from Pitt. One of the worst defensive performances I’ve ever seen. Did Narduzzi throw out some Dinoisms in his presser. Took us by surprise, no film, didn’t plan for it etc.
It's Shaferesque, like when we needed a trick play to beat an FCS Nova team.Great win for the kids and I thought it was a fun game, but let's face it: resorting to these tactics to beat this Pitt team is a reflection of the deep issues facing the program. It's not going to work as well when teams have a chance to scheme against it, even when those teams are some of the ACC weaklings.
These 2 things can be true…I did comment near the end of the game that Monday we’d have posts arguing that Pitt is better than their record shows. I was wrong…… by two days.
Yeah but that Nova team had Montana's son at QB. I thought we had killed him but he came back and finished the game. Tough kid.It's Shaferesque, like when we needed a trick play to beat an FCS Nova team.
See Ga Tech coached by Paul JohnsonMakes you wonder if the triple option, with the right talent, is sustainable in the ACC.
Win 4 OOC games, and a minimum of two conference games, probably more. Never get blown out because you’d be controlling the clock. Sign me up.
It’s about injuriesGreat win for the kids and I thought it was a fun game, but let's face it: resorting to these tactics to beat this Pitt team is a reflection of the deep issues facing the program. It's not going to work as well when teams have a chance to scheme against it, even when those teams are some of the ACC weaklings.