OrangeXtreme
The Mayor of Dewitt
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 232,125
- Like
- 422,225
that's absurd imo
Rutgers is planning on using a laugh track
Or we are all really living in a 2k simulatorThis is clearly to normalize the watching pf the game on TV, not to replicate home field advantage
If they pump in their usual crowd noise, it'll still be silent.Rutgers is planning on using a laugh track
They can actually be pretty vocal when they want.If they pump in their usual crowd noise, it'll still be silent.
Say its 3rd and short. The LB waves his arms in upwards motion in the hopes of making the "crowd" cheer more. Do they raise the volume to make it louder?
Say its 3rd and short. The LB waves his arms in upwards motion in the hopes of making the "crowd" cheer more. Do they raise the volume to make it louder?
Yup. I was just adding one game-like scenario. Do teams have liberties with what they can do???They basically did stuff like this in production for soccer games broadcast in the Fox family. Cheering when the home team scored, booing when the home team took a hard foul, stunned silence when the visiting team scored, etc.
A poster above shared their feelings on it. I thought it'd be very distracting but after a bit it felt a little more normal and definitely isn't as distracting as the digitally added fans that the MLB added to broadcasts.
I personally like what MLS is doing with the noise being piped in at the stadium level and you can hear it in the background of the actual telecast. It sounds so much more natural than the digitally enhanced sounds added in at the studio level.
Based on a few quotes I've seen, the piped in noise is much less intimidating to visiting teams than real fans in the seats making it.
Ha, Yeah. And they likely have more 2nd and short possibilities than 3rd and short.Well, if we’re still talking about Rutgers, then yes -
they increase the volume of crickets chirping.