I've said it before. I believe you will see a fixed roof of EFTE material similar to the new Vikings stadium, which requires a much lighter structure to support it, even with snow load.
http://www.vikings.com/news/article-1/New-Vikings-Stadium-QA-The-Clear-Roof/dff31d45-bc82-41ec-
b768-2ef03827bbe7
http://www.startribune.com/no-6-new-vikings-stadium-big-bold-and-glassy/207314401/
It's not a rumor and just maybe all you negative guys should get on board and support the university cause they know what they are doing. Did we need a dome in 1980, no but look what that has done for the university. You are going to see a flat roof that retracts a new concourse with shops around the perimeter. Also your going to see state of the art led lighting. I don't really care if you guys think it's a rumor cause it's not. Go big or go home should always be university's moto
well if the change they roof no matter what,the HVAC system will have to change with it. Your wish might come true,but the chillers will be very huge to do itJust put some freakin Air Conditioning in and I'll be happy
I can't tell you how I know but there are blueprints done and companies have been hired some local some from out of state. I can say the the main firm that was hired is out of Texas. I'm actually shocked it's taken this long for the "rumor" to come out on here. I have spoken to a few people on here through messages about it. It's happening and it's going to be a pretty incredible structure when it's done. It should do what the dome did for us in the 80s and 90s and put us back on the map. We should all be proud that the university is taking such a big step in upgrading the dome.That sounds very...definitive. I am NOT calling you out here, but I am curious as to how you can be so certain about the renovations. Can you tell us anything more??
I have always been intrigued by EFTE every time it's mentioned. But, I have never seen it mentioned in connection with the Dome renovations. I'm guessing it is cost prohibitive, or just not practical.
Would any architects or engineers here care to comment about the feasibility and cost of using it for the Dome?
It's not a rumor and just maybe all you negative guys should get on board and support the university cause they know what they are doing. Did we need a dome in 1980, no but look what that has done for the university. You are going to see a flat roof that retracts a new concourse with shops around the perimeter. Also your going to see state of the art led lighting. I don't really care if you guys think it's a rumor cause it's not. Go big or go home should always be university's moto
I can't tell you how I know but there are blueprints done and companies have been hired some local some from out of state. I can say the the main firm that was hired is out of Texas. I'm actually shocked it's taken this long for the "rumor" to come out on here. I have spoken to a few people on here through messages about it. It's happening and it's going to be a pretty incredible structure when it's done. It should do what the dome did for us in the 80s and 90s and put us back on the map. We should all be proud that the university is taking such a big step in upgrading the dome.
Cusefan78 said:It's not a rumor and just maybe all you negative guys should get on board and support the university cause they know what they are doing. Did we need a dome in 1980, no but look what that has done for the university. You are going to see a flat roof that retracts a new concourse with shops around the perimeter. Also your going to see state of the art led lighting. I don't really care if you guys think it's a rumor cause it's not. Go big or go home should always be university's moto
They will play at Ralph Wilson because it's the only stadium that will hold the minimum amount needed for the acc. My guess is they will only sell the lower bowl seats.
I'm not an engineer, but a Vikings fan who has followed the planning and construction of the new stadium. I just think this is a very strong possibility if they want a fixed roof on the existing Carrier Dome.
All games were played elsewhere during dome construction.probably right as the stadium is big. if we do better than expected this year it may help attendance. scheduling all away games is silly imho, UNLESS THE PAYDAY FOR THAT IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. DIDN'T WE PLAY 1-2 GAMES AT CORNELL WHEN THE DOME WAS BEING BUILT???FRANKLIN FIELD MAYBE
All games were played elsewhere during dome construction.
Let's be honest a flat roofed dome Doesn't have a wow factor that a retractable roof gives su. Think about it this was. During the space race did we have to go to the moon, no but we did and that put us as a world leader and showed the world we can do anything. If Syracuse just tosses up a flat roof you're pretty much saying we are not going to go the extra mile. I don't care about data Syracuse needs to be an innovator and replace the dome with an upgrade. Will it be used often I think more the you think. Think lax games and football. Also think about the possible use of the stadium during the spring and summer for other events that could generate income for the university. Right now it sits idle during that period.Relax with the "negative" nonsense. What most people are saying is that the cost of a retractable roof might be excessive given the number of times it'd be opened (for football maybe 2-3 times/year, maybe for a couple concerts in the summer). If SU wants to blow money on it they are welcome to, but it doesn't seem like the smartest allocation of resources. I could certainly be convinced otherwise if there is data to support it.
Cornell isn't big enough2 games at Ralph Wilson (Wash St and Miami)
2 games at Meadowlands (PSU and WV)
1 game at Cornell (BC)
It holds 10k. We are good.Cornell isn't big enough
It holds 10k. We are good.
Let's be honest a flat roofed dome Doesn't have a wow factor that a retractable roof gives su. Think about it this was. During the space race did we have to go to the moon, no but we did and that put us as a world leader and showed the world we can do anything. If Syracuse just tosses up a flat roof you're pretty much saying we are not going to go the extra mile. I don't care about data Syracuse needs to be an innovator and replace the dome with an upgrade. Will it be used often I think more the you think. Think lax games and football. Also think about the possible use of the stadium during the spring and summer for other events that could generate income for the university. Right now it sits idle during that period.
Wrong nys spent 50 million in geddes because the powers that be in geddes had the forward thinking to think outside the box and build a really nice theater that will bring in money to their village. Unlike Syracuse who was offered 250 million and said no thanks. Falcone and company in geddes has worked hand in a hand with nys and business to bring in conpanies and the theater. Syracuse needs more people like that.Most LAX games are played in February and March. I can think of maybe 2-3 games over the past 3 seasons where it was nice enough outside.
And NYS just spent $50 million for a new Amphitheater in Syracuse which is expected to host 20 concerts a year.
2 games at Ralph Wilson (Wash St and Miami)
2 games at Meadowlands (PSU and WV)
1 game at Cornell (BC)