Lacrosse, high school football games...yeah that roof would never be open SMHRelax with the "negative" nonsense. What most people are saying is that the cost of a retractable roof might be excessive given the number of times it'd be opened (for football maybe 2-3 times/year, maybe for a couple concerts in the summer). If SU wants to blow money on it they are welcome to, but it doesn't seem like the smartest allocation of resources. I could certainly be convinced otherwise if there is data to support it.
You may find it's the replacement for the Georgia Domedidn't someone post a video of the design of the new Atlanta Braves stadium with a retractable roof? I know I remember seeing it at one point and it was fabulous. I'm off to google to see if I can find it...
edit: it's not the Braves new stadium...what other stadiums are being built right now? Is it the Vikings?
There will be a wider concourse with shops lined around the outside.If you look at every facility with a retractable roof, it's not frequently open. If the costs are the same then sure why not add the extra bells and whistles. However if the RR roof is more (and it probably is) then no need to add that. Use the money for a different area. A wider concourse perhaps.
Better ventilation/AC.If you look at every facility with a retractable roof, it's not frequently open. If the costs are the same then sure why not add the extra bells and whistles. However if the RR roof is more (and it probably is) then no need to add that. Use the money for a different area. A wider concourse perhaps.
I certainly hope that is part of this renovation plan. It would be a huge mistake if it is not.A wider concourse perhaps.
Yeah, it will be pretty much a lost season.
Season ticket sales and attendance will drop dramatically.
If you look at every facility with a retractable roof, it's not frequently open. If the costs are the same then sure why not add the extra bells and whistles. However if the RR roof is more (and it probably is) then no need to add that. Use the money for a different area. A wider concourse perhaps.
As a Rochester-based season ticket holder, the only thing that changes for me is the direction I travel.Yeah, it will be pretty much a lost season.
Season ticket sales and attendance will drop dramatically.
I'd much rather see the other amenities- wider concourses, better food options, club/suite seating for fb and hoops than a retractable roof. That would be better for the long-term financial health of SU Athletics as the IPF lets the Dome have more opportunities for big events, and the other amenities will be more appealing than a roof.
And Buffalo cares not about SU sports.Only question I got is this stadium going to be publicly or privately fianced?
If we are getting tax dollars then get the best stadium we can. If it's privately financed then don't get everything.
I would agree with KOIII MetLife over Wilson. More alumni in NYC than WNY. Season ticket holders would understand the short term move.
Probably a dumb question, but if it is EFTE, would it need to be retractable?
Cheers,
Neil
HockeyLacrosse, high school football games...yeah that roof would never be open SMH