orange79
Internet Sleuth
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 41,763
- Like
- 128,755
Eh, if all he does is dunks and makes threes, let's run offense that gets him dunks and threes.
Eh, if all he does is dunks and makes threes, let's run offense that gets him dunks and threes.
Maybe like a Southerland type arc?The more tape highlights or not I see the more this kid looks like a multi year project than early contributor.
Not a knock on the kid either just where it looks like he is in his development currently.
Maybe like a Southerland type arc?
Bunch can be a fine player for us. He has the athleticism and shooting ability to fit here as a Southerland type. We don’t need everyone to create their own shot. We need to get more motion in our sets and movement away from ISO ball anyway.
3 and D is a position in the NBA. Why can't we have 3 and dunk and D?Eh, if all he does is dunks and makes threes, let's run offense that gets him dunks and threes.
I think it’s the “D” part that might be in question here.3 and D is a position in the NBA. Why can't we have 3 and dunk and D?
Really all of it is in question but he at least took a lot of 3’s in high school which is sometimes a better indicator for projecting shooting skill than actually making them.I think it’s the “D” part that might be in question here.
Lack of effort will find him sitting next to the assistant coaches.Bunch's numbers in the EYBL were solid so that gives us some idea that he can produce against top competition. I think he has the athleticism to play defense. It's the effort that has come into question at times.
Yeah I was using the term casually. I don't see it either given that while he has the tools he has even been inconsistent at Wasatch which, even with good competition is a walk in the park vs the collegiate level.
Bunch somewhat continues the trend of great kids with some intriguing skills but also with clear areas of development that show up even at this level. You could argue that many of our better recruiting classes didn't have the obvious areas of development before stepping on campus as most were elite in comparison to the majority of their peers.
Hes also has grown to like 6 foot 9... don't think his handle will be an issue eitherWe've been watching his clips for months, and I still don't see a guy who can dribble. He's not our savior, guys. He's not even a James Southerland, athletically or with his 3 point shot. He might be a Preston Shumpert in a couple years. Which is not bad, but let's talk about what we see, and I don't see a guy who can dribble yet.
Woody Newton
We've been watching his clips for months, and I still don't see a guy who can dribble. He's not our savior, guys. He's not even a James Southerland, athletically or with his 3 point shot. He might be a Preston Shumpert in a couple years. Which is not bad, but let's talk about what we see, and I don't see a guy who can dribble yet.
I don’t think Woody was any better off the bounce in high school but I would say it was a significant weakness for both of them so not saying much.Woody showed some skills with the bounce his final prep year. Don't see any of that with Bunch.
I don’t think Woody was any better off the bounce in high school but I would say it was a significant weakness for both of them so not saying much.
I watched probably 5 of Woody’s games and I’m not exaggerating when I say he turned it over over 50% of the time when he dribbled the ball. It was legitimately impressive to watch.Woody , at least in the tape I saw had some ability off the bounce ( his final year that is). Not a ton but some. I don't see anything at all on tape with Bunch
I watched probably 5 of Woody’s games and I’m not exaggerating when I say he turned it over over 50% of the time when he dribbled the ball. It was legitimately impressive to watch.
I watched most of this clip.Another full game video of Bunch's team for those interested against Montverde.
He probably isn't a Syracuse-level recruit, but I'm kinda surprised that Matus Hronsky hasn't gotten any offers (at least that I know of). He's like 6'7" and is just a very good 3 point shooter.
I watched most of this clip.
To my eyes, Bunch is quicker, jumps far better and is just more athletic in general than Newton. Appears to be a better outside shooter as well. Newton was better defensively.
He drove to the basket 3 times. Unsuccessfully but he tried. His handle seems fine. No concerns in that area.
He is a far better athlete than Shump. Looks perimeter oriented, very good in transition, excellent outside shooter. Not very strong, not a banger, unlikely to ever be a top rebounder. I don’t think he is going to block shots either.
Limited ability to get to the paint.
Very Southerland like. I am not sure he is as tall as Dirty was and it is hard to tell on tape how gaseous he is. But based on this one game, he looks like Southerland only a bit further developed at the same age. Dirty developed a lot during his time on the hill.
Here are Dirty’s stats at Syracuse. I think a similar career path is reasonable to expect. Because he is more advanced, I think he will be better a little earlier.
James Southerland College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
James Southerland - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
yeah, he does seem to have a built-in confidence about himNice to see him play well against the best of the best. For me biggest thing is that quick release and athleticism. If he can defend admirably and hit his jump shot confidently then he can be a nice bench piece right out of the gate. Certainly he won't have shell shock facing elite talent after playing at Wasatch which is great.
yeah, he does seem to have a built-in confidence about him