Summer Sessions 2025 | Page 19 | Syracusefan.com
.

Summer Sessions 2025

I don’t think he meant ‘as Kiyan goes, we go.’ He probably should have referred to Kiyan as a litmus test. He followed up with saying that if Kiyan is a contributor in the ~18 minute realm, good. If we’re relying on him, bad.

So, sure, he’s an x-factor if that means he’s good enough to contribute and that that having quality depth makes us legit.
 
I don’t think he meant ‘as Kiyan goes, we go.’ He probably should have referred to Kiyan as a litmus test. He followed up with saying that if Kiyan is a contributor in the ~18 minute realm, good. If we’re relying on him, bad.

So, sure, he’s an x-factor if that means he’s good enough to contribute and that that having quality depth makes us legit.

Yeah I was fine with that just the complete omission of Kingz who is the guy in front of him for good reason was odd. It’s a bit of an assumption that because Kiyan is Melos son that there is unreasonable expectations with him which I would argue no one in our fanbase or local media has been taking such a position.
 
Yeah I was fine with that just the complete omission of Kingz who is the guy in front of him for good reason was odd. It’s a bit of an assumption that because Kiyan is Melos son that there is unreasonable expectations with him which I would argue no one in our fanbase or local media has been taking such a position.
To me it came off as Goodman not having a good pulse of the team. Maybe it was poor wording (x-factor) but to describe potential outcomes for team success somewhat centered around a likely bench player that may or may not get considerable playing time is a stretch and makes me believe he only has a superficial understanding of this team.
 
Weird call out on Kiyan- without any reference to Kingz who will be that guy much more likely and Kiyan will be off the bench.
Kind of shows how irrelevant we are to the national media these days. They aren’t, and don’t care to be, tuned into who the expected key players are. He just took the obvious name that everyone knows.
 
To me it came off as Goodman not having a good pulse of the team. Maybe it was poor wording (x-factor) but to describe potential outcomes for team success somewhat centered around a likely bench player that may or may not get considerable playing time is a stretch and makes me believe he only has a superficial understanding of this team.
Felt the same way listening to the interview. Seemed like he did not bother to research the portal additions.
Basically defaulted to Duke, NCst because of wade and Louisville. I was a little surprised Louisville was getting so much props.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,921
Messages
5,120,997
Members
6,075
Latest member
44mb44

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
857
Total visitors
1,003


...
Top Bottom