Our spreads have been higher all year. I guess I'm not surprised because I predicted 9. If you look at other games like Pitt (which was a lot higher than people/computers predicted opened at 7), and nova which was a little higher than computers predicted. So it really isn't that surprising from that stand point. What will be interesting where they put the Duke game.
Vegas does this to get action. If it's say -6.5, they are less likely to get action. -9.5 will get people to jump on Wake.
It will still end up higher than the computer models project.I have not actually seen one of our lines actually go up after opening. So just wait.
Might have to go split screen tonight.with a -4 everyone will jump on zona of course. It's already up to 6.
yes but even in close road games with BC and Miami we ended up winning by double digitsI am. Syracuse plays a ball control offense with fewer possessions than most teams. So that alone often results in games with smaller margins of victory. Wake Forest is a talented, but young team who hasn't lost at home this season and is going to have 14k on hand who want to show the carpet bagger big east team that you don't come into NC and win basketball games ("Yeah! lung cancer and basketball. That's what North Carolina does!").
I think SU wins, but I doubt they roll Wake by double digits and there are going to be some What moments when Wake buries three straight threes and Syracuse is down or up by a point or two.
Close. You didn't finish #2 though. It should read "we play with fire pretty much every game , yet still cover by double digitsif i did my math right, and i think i did...
= What
- wake is undefeated at home.
- we play with fire pretty much every game.
I remember hearing some gambling Vegas guy on radio, once explain that Vegas has rating systems and they do not like to veer off them for opening lines. It made sense, but it was a little complex, and as I am only a casual better I forgot the reasoning.
You can get Wake at +375 on the ML which gives Wake a 21% chance to win. That sounds about right
During the GROB era I bet on Syracuse to lose all the time, and then would cheer my a$s off to lose my bet. But, when I was walking out of the dome week after week all dejected, I took a small bit of solace in the fact that I made a little cash. And people can save the karma nonsense. lol.Now that's tempting, but I would never be able to pull myself to bet against Syracuse to lose.
690West said:During the GROB era I bet on Syracuse to lose all the time, and then would cheer my a$s off to lose my bet. But, when I was walking out of the dome week after week all dejected, I took a small bit of solace in the fact that I made a little cash. And people can save the karma nonsense. lol.
there are going to be some What moments when Wake buries three straight threes and Syracuse is down or up by a point or two.
prediction. That What moment will occur within the first 1:30.
During the GROB era I bet on Syracuse to lose all the time, and then would cheer my a$s off to lose my bet. But, when I was walking out of the dome week after week all dejected, I took a small bit of solace in the fact that I made a little cash. And people can save the karma nonsense. lol.
up to -10 everywhere.
Vegas is begging the public to take Wake. You know what that means.