NJCuse97
Once Thought to be Taylor Ham Campanile Prophet
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 3,121
- Like
- 5,479
So the two suggestions in the bold text are:The recruits who commit will do so knowing this is a rebuild. Schiano will be targeting a much higher level of recruit going forward so competition will be stiff. Of course there will be some recruits who commit/decommit just like every program has but I am confident he winds up pulling an outstanding class this year despite his first year record...
1)Every recruit Rutgers has gotten since Schiano's last stint didn't recognize that they were walking into a rebuild?
2)Every staff post Schiano 1 were not targeting high level recruits?
At least that explains the performance, but not the strategy of the previous two head coaches.
I am one who respects the potential Schiano brings, but only in the smoke and mirrors it seems only he can create. I am a proud NJ native and resident and I went to the same high school as Greg, even had him as a high school assistant coach. There is very little opportunity this turns out well for he and Rutgers unless we are going to say that 3 wins is a vast percentage improvement (50% improvement?) over last year.
The biggest unknown in this has not yet been stated. What if Rutgers just hired a responsible new President? What if he actually tries to balance the books? We don't know what he is yet, but he comes from Northwestern and Stanford and we know where their allegiance lies when choosing between football and academic reputation (and yes he played football at Stanford).