Red apparently staying true to JB in this regard. No different than when JB played Lyden at the 5, then Marek, etc. Wash, rinse and repeat.
How about a quality Competitive lossQuality win would be nice.
I have to imagine the loss to the DePaul juggernaut was worseWas this the largest loss margin?
March? We haven’t been on the bubble all year.We are the textbook definition of mediocre. It’s great to see them beating the dregs of the NCAA but getting curb stomped by every good team = no man’s land. I don’t think this team is going to be any better come March. We just don’t have the talent yet to match up with these upper echelon teams.
bacot played 17 minutes and put up 16 pt 11 rbd 1 block 1 steal.did the NCAA pass something to allow Bacot to play 8 years?
Imagine if he played 30bacot played 17 minutes and put up 16 pt 11 rbd 1 block 1 steal.
Like a man playing with boys. Young boys. Speaks to the level of talent disparity.bacot played 17 minutes and put up 16 pt 11 rbd 1 block 1 steal.
Don’t think I’ve ever seen that, at least with a Syracuse game.And ESPN breaks away from its coverage before the end to get to the UK v Texas A&M Pregame.
Like a man playing with boys. Young boys.
False. The fact we have zero bad losses and a winning record would put us on the bubble. Would we get in today, idk, our signature win was against an injured Oregon team. But we would definitely be in the conversation for an at large bid, even if we don’t look like a tournament team.March? We haven’t been on the bubble all year.
Just because you say false doesn’t mean jt is. We have one good win, we have 3 games left against ranked teams, one more UNC and two against Clemson who may not even be ranked by the time we play them. We have very few games that would be quad 1, I’m not sure there is a path or was a path.False. The fact we have zero bad losses and a winning record would put us on the bubble. Would we get in today, idk, our signature win was against an injured Oregon team. But we would definitely be in the conversation for an at large bid, even if we don’t look like a tournament team.
I agree that we need a few signature wins. Depended on how many will be based on if we pick up any bad losses.Just because you say false doesn’t mean jt is. We have one good win, we have 3 games left against ranked teams, one more UNC and two against Clemson who may not even be ranked by the time we play them. We have very few games that would be quad 1, I’m not sure there is a path or was a path.
that’s the same argument you could make for 80% would BC be in? Or Pitt? They are in the same exact boat.False. The fact we have zero bad losses and a winning record would put us on the bubble. Would we get in today, idk, our signature win was against an injured Oregon team. But we would definitely be in the conversation for an at large bid, even if we don’t look like a tournament team.