I did not compare the severity of the offenses at Ohio State and Penn State. I compared the same language used as a defense in minimizing the responsibility of those who had a chance to take action earlier. I never once said the situations at each school were the same, simply that the JoePa reported the incident to his immediate supervisor and never pursued it further. Please see:
When asked if he considered calling the police, Paterno replied, "To be honest with you, I didn't. This isn't my field ... I tried to look through the Penn State guidelines to see what I was supposed to do. It said I was supposed to call Tim [Curley]. So I called him." (from:
'Paterno': A Relentless, Failed Defense of Penn State's Disgraced Coach )
I personally do not view that as a sufficient defense whether it is something as severe as Penn State or something less severe (but still very important) like Urban Meyer at OSU with domestic violence. You misconstruing what I'm saying as a comparison between the crimes at Penn State and the possible domestic violence at OSU is disingenuous and grasping at straws.
In regards to performance issues because of various personal situations, I'm not disagreeing that people will hit slumps in their lives. I wholeheartedly understand. Although, Zach Smith has been a poor wide receivers coach since his sart at OSU. Ask any Ohio State fan and most will attest to that fact and how the receivers have been one of the weak points of their teams the last couple of years. A slump because of infidelity, marital issues, drugs, health, etc. I believe to be on a whole different level than domestic violence but maybe you disagree. I also
vehemently disagree with you regarding holding someone's actions in 2009 and today in a different view because I don't believe they are all that different.
Being arrested for aggravated battery of his pregnant wife is just as horrific in 2009 as it is in 2018. It's astonishing to me that someone could see that differently, but to each their own... I guess. 2009 wasn't all that long ago (and I agree public opinion has improved but that's a weak defense for Urban and Zach Smith, in my opinion).
Zack Smith worked under Urban Meyer at UF in 2009 and was made aware of his 2009 arrest for aggravated assault on his pregnant wife (8-10 weeks at the time) (from:
https://deadspin.com/urban-meyer-was-aware-of-ohio-state-coachs-2009-domesti-1827843992 ). I don't care what year that is (1950 or 2018), accepting that and then being made aware of another incident of beating his wife in 2015 is willful ignorance (at best, like I said previously)) but more likely immoral behavior. I.E. I would like him, Urban, to be held to a higher standard than just reporting it. Quote from Deadspin Article linked above of Meyer's:
“Zach was an intern, a very young couple. As I do any time, that I imagine most coaches or people in leadership positions, you receive a phone call, you tell your boss, let the experts do their jobs. We’re certainly not going to investigate. It came back to me that what was reported wasn’t actually what happened. Shelley and I actually both got involved because of our relationship with that family and advised her counseling and wanted to help as we moved forward.” Doesn't that sound similar to JoePa's quote earlier? (or maybe I'm losing it). I understand Urban says what was reported wasn't actually what happened but, as I said in my previous post, Courtney Smith is so far the person who has not lied and I'm inclined to agree with her side of the story for the reason stated in the paragraphs below.
Another article/quote:
"In 2009, when a graduate assistant under Meyer at Florida, Smith was arrested and charged with felony assault following an altercation with his then-pregnant wife. His wife declined to file charges. The two have since divorced." (from:
Urban Meyer knew of 2009 abuse allegations involving fired Ohio State assistant Zach Smith )
The charges being dropped in 2009 are significant because Courtney Smith claims Bruce and Urban Meyer's right-hand man pressured her to drop them. Meyer in the USA Today article calls it a 'very personal matter' and that what was reported doesn't match what happened. Maybe that's true but maybe the victim being pressured to drop charges is the reality. I'll lean towards the latter while you seem to lean towards the former. Urban and Shelley recommended some counseling while his two close confidants convinced Courtney Smith to drop the charges and Urban says that what was reported in the police report wasn't what happened. I find that far too convenient but you are free to take the man at his word (I obviously don't think his word is worth much). See below for source on said confidants.
Source & Quote for McMurphy stating De Fries and Bruce pressuring Courtney Smith to drop Charges: "
A few days after Zach’s 2009 arrest, Courtney said two of Meyer’s closest friends – Hiram de Fries and Earle Bruce – asked her to drop the charges. Bruce is Zach Smith’s grandfather, de Fries is Meyer’s “life coach.”" (from:
What we know about Meyer’s handling of abuse allegations )
The police report states Zach Smith picked her up by her shirt and slammed her into the wall and I lean towards believing that as opposed to Urban Meyer because, as I said previously, I don't trust his word (I also find his responses unconvincing (see below).
"The police report obtained by The Lantern states that Smith, “grabbed the victim by her t-shirt, picked her up and threw her into a bedroom wall.” Meyer said he would not get into specifics on what happened in the alleged incident involving Smith, saying, “The decision was made. I think the details I’m obligated to give, I gave." (from:
Football: Meyer knew of 2009 domestic violence allegations involving Zach Smith )
I understand second chances but I personally would not have given one to someone who was interning for me and he got arrested for aggravated battery against his pregnant wife. Would you maybe view that as unforgiving, maybe, but I'm okay with that. Urban's mentor and his right hand man convincing Courtney Smith to not pursue charges doesn't change that. But, let's say it does. That would mean Smith was already working on at least his second chance with Urban already and was hired as the WR coach in 2015 and not too long afterwards Urban was made aware of a second incident abusing his wife. Urban elected to report it to the AD (i.e. the bare minimum in reporting and not taking any action despite it being the second instance we know Urban knows about). I understand you believe that is okay and it isn't a manager's responsibility, as I said before I disagree especially when one of the core tenants for the team you are managing is to treat women with respect.
Urban was privy to much of this information through his mentor, his relationship with Zach, and most importantly via his wife as demonstrated via those text messages posted by Brett McMurphy. He was privy to it in 2009 when made aware of the arrest of his mentor's grandson and we know his wife knew of the severity (and Urban has spoken in depth about the strength and communication between he and his wife). Urban waited until Zach Smith had been arrested for a third time in relation to criminal behavior against the same woman before he relented and parted ways with Zach Smith (from:
Another domestic violence arrest reportedly surfaces against Ohio State coach Zach Smith ).
You may not see Urban's decisions to continue working with someone he knew to have been arrested twice for abusing his wife as a black eye, but I most definitely do. And I already believed the state he left UF in when he departed and how he ran the program left him with a black eye.
I understand your full disclosures but that doesn't change the fact that you and I obviously disagree on this. I don't believe we will see eye-to-eye. I do not believe Zach Smith deserved a second and third chance (potentially more for all we know) regardless if charges were dropped, Zach Smith's actions were just as wrong in 2009 as they are today in 2018, and Urban was fully aware of the incidents. This is not the court of the law, everything in my above post is obviously just my opinion and I am free to deduce (or assume) from the pieces of information available that Meyer was protecting his mentor's grandson in spite of his supposed desire to treat women with respect (which I obviously don't buy it).
TL;DR: We basically disagree entirely. I also probably reiterated multiple points too many times but it is what it is.