what do you think of ESPN website reboot?

[Nicknack]

The very first thing to come out of my mouth when looking at it was ewwwwww. It's absolutely awful. Looks like they are going retro; maybe the show should go back to looking like this...

 

[Doc5120]

I can't stand it. Terrible layout.

 

[MSOrange]

cbssportsline.com isn't perfect but I love how you can just hover over each sport at the top and see the headline links for each sports. Not sure why other sites can't grasp that simple concept. Like I said, cbs isn't perfect. It seems like they have a video that starts playing every 5 seconds whether you click on a link or not.

 

[Guinness]

love it. much cleaner presentation of stories and information. hated the old design. too cluttered, could barely read it.

I agree.

 

[syr14]

I was just thinking the other day of how the espn site was starting to look dated. The trend in web design is to simplify things. I like the new design.

 

[Eric15]

love it. much cleaner presentation of stories and information. hated the old design. too cluttered, could barely read it.

Completely agree, I like it too. I'm surprised to hear so many dislike it.

 

[Guinness]

It is clean and fast. Which is the opposite of the SI page.

 

[Eric15]

If companies always listened to the public when it comes to not wanting their favorite websites to be redesigned for the better, the entire internet would still look like this...

 

[MikeSU02]

I really like it. The last site was around for way, way too long. Now that they have a responsive design, it's a much more seamless experience moving from desktop to mobile.

I've already logged in with FB and set my favorite teams so I can be disappointed in my Mets at the very start of each day!

 

[br801]

They still have a website? Screw ESPN for employing that arrogant, doughy turd Bob Ley and shamelessly assaulting the sensibilities of humanity with an array of unwatchable, unlistenable, unreadable hacks.

 

[Eric15]

They still have a website?

I just double-checked and yes, they still do.

 

[MSOrange]

It is clean and fast. Which is the opposite of the SI page.

SI is just horrible now. I used to go there at least to read Hot Clicks every day for years. Haven't even been there to do that in like 6 months because the layout finally just made me insane with how slow everything was.

 

[CraigForth]

 

[HOFCeluck]

In a month everyone will adapt and it'll be like the change never happened.

 

[l'orange]

Its clean, reads like a news site and they do have lots of content funneling through. I appreciate the responsive design for mobile and tablets.

 

[kidorange]

Haven't been on ESPN since my computer got slow. It has to be the busiest site on the world wide web.

 

[AlaskaSU]

They removed the site search box. I use espn to check scores and the old site was perfect for that. New one, not so much.

 

[pearl31]

I really like it. The last site was around for way, way too long. Now that they have a responsive design, it's a much more seamless experience moving from desktop to mobile.

I've already logged in with FB and set my favorite teams so I can be disappointed in my Mets at the very start of each day!

html5, baby

 

[NashvilleOrange]

Mobile is definitely improved. Maybe I missed it but yesterday I couldn't easily see what channel games were on from the 'scores' screen. Did they add that this morning or did I miss that yesterday?

 

[upperdeck]

ask CNN how the wait a month is working out.. still awful and this is just as bad..

 

[orange79]

Completely agree, I like it too. I'm surprised to hear so many dislike it.

Get off my lawn

 

[upperdeck]

this site nails the epic fail.. i am more shocked why some on here like it unless as they say in the article you are only using tablets and ignoring 90% of the content./

http://circlemarketing.com/espn-com-re-design-fail/

 

[kirbivore]

 

[midloviking]

 

[Dave85]

nm

too many ads and it visual artifacts when it loads, hurts the eyes with all the flashing and resizing of images