Cuse House
All American
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2013
- Messages
- 4,217
- Like
- 10,013
This first half is making my point. Why is Frank not in for Cooney?
This first half is making my point. Why is Frank not in for Cooney?
How about now? Do you now see why Cooney is in there? Different second half for him. He doesn't know how to quit. His sheer drive to win got us two crucial loose balls at the end. He sank a shot in OT that I wondered why he took it. That is until the post game interview where JB stated he called that play for him and really didn't know why. But that is what you expect from 5th year seniors. Howard does make some great passes but he struggled a little with the VATech guards pressuring him tonight. As he gets stronger and improves his shot he should be a fabulous player for us. He is seeing now what it takes all game long to succeed at this level.This first half is making my point. Why is Frank not in for Cooney?
How about now? Do you now see why Cooney is in there? Different second half for him. He doesn't know how to quit. His sheer drive to win got us two crucial loose balls at the end. He sank a shot in OT that I wondered why he took it. That is until the post game interview where JB stated he called that play for him and really didn't know why. But that is what you expect from 5th year seniors. Howard does make some great passes but he struggled a little with the VATech guards pressuring him tonight. As he gets stronger and improves his shot he should be a fabulous player for us. He is seeing now what it takes all game long to succeed at this level.
There is a reason those who played at that level and those who coach at that level love to have 5th year seniors.
Right, so 38 minutes of awful play doesn't matter? Seems logical. Once again, I am not saying play Frank in crunch time, but throughout the game he needs more run. He gets the ball to open shooters. Cooney was a waste of space for the majority of the game last night. Trust me, I am a Cooney fan, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't sit more.How about now? Do you now see why Cooney is in there? Different second half for him. He doesn't know how to quit. His sheer drive to win got us two crucial loose balls at the end. He sank a shot in OT that I wondered why he took it. That is until the post game interview where JB stated he called that play for him and really didn't know why. But that is what you expect from 5th year seniors. Howard does make some great passes but he struggled a little with the VATech guards pressuring him tonight. As he gets stronger and improves his shot he should be a fabulous player for us. He is seeing now what it takes all game long to succeed at this level.
There is a reason those who played at that level and those who coach at that level love to have 5th year seniors.
Yes, but it was with a pick that Cooney decided not to wait for.Boeheim designed a 25-footer for Cooney off a curl?
Right, so 38 minutes of awful play doesn't matter? Seems logical. Once again, I am not saying play Frank in crunch time, but throughout the game he needs more run. He gets the ball to open shooters. Cooney was a waste of space for the majority of the game last night. Trust me, I am a Cooney fan, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't sit more.
Pass the dutchie on the left hand side if you think Howard's getting minutes in the waning moments of a close game. He got good run today and is doing well as our third guard.
There should be no doubt, Howard doesn't play limited minutes because he is young, he plays limited minutes because he is a FAR inferior basketball player to Cooney and Gbinije and this team has a very small margin for error.
So many people look at Cooney's 3 point % and seemingly nothing else, and judge his game based solely on that, which is ridiculous. This Georgia Tech game was a well played game, it just wasn't a well played offensive game. Defense is HALF the game, and Cooney and Gbinije played about as well on defense as it is possible to play. They won this game. If Howard scored 30 points offensively that would have made him about the equal on offense of what Cooney did on defense . . . he scored zero. The minutes were distributed properly and because they were distributed properly, we won.
That is a reasonable analysis. Frank did make a bad pass that was stolen, but then again, Cooney made a few as well. I guess my view is that I would rather have someone who will get the ball to others in spots to score when Cooney is off because he isn't the creater that FH is.Cooney was awful in the first half last night, but it's hard to argue with JB's decision to keep him on the court. He was 2-4 in the second half and 3-4 from the line with 9 points. He also had 3 assists and 3 steals. Frank came in early and turned it over twice, and that sealed his fate. Plus he's just not there defensively yet.
At one point in the first half Frank was going to come in for Trevor and then G committed his second foul so Trevor stayed in and G came out.
Boeheim designed a 25-footer for Cooney off a curl?
Not sure he wanted a 25 footer but he told the post game interviewer he called for that play for Cooney. He also said laughingly that he doesn't know why he called for it. Guess he suddenly remembered how off Cooney was in the first half. He also said it wasn't a good look either as the defense played it pretty well.Boeheim designed a 25-footer for Cooney off a curl?
Cooney
+ Defense
+ Has the ability and has already proven to get us back in games as a streak shooter.
+ Foul shooting
+ Leadership and intangibles. Played a ton of minutes and had a red shirt. He's seen plenty of college basketball and been part of some big games.
- When he's cold and not making up for it by getting in the lane, pulling up or finishing on the right side, etc, hurts our percentages to get points.
- Not known to get his teammates easy looks. All or nothing most of the time when the ball is in his hands.
Howard
+ Natural PG
+ Been a great passer since high school. Makes people around him better.
- Defense
- Shooting, scoring
It's a tradeoff. Cooney still deserves the bulk of the minutes and if he's shooting the ball well, he is more important in a tight game. But for Howard, he's clearly shown that he deserves run. I trust his ability to make plays and handle the ball as a PG. And even with the current limitations, I don't think he's completely lost on defense and he should learn what other underclassmen learn eventually: go as far inside as you can to get your shot and work your way out after you get your percentages up. Dribble all the way into the paint and either pass or take your shot. Roberson slowly learned this lesson. Even Cooney, Richardson and G drive when they get cold. The fact remains that JB is going to value the guy who plays better on the defensive end. But if Cooney is ice cold and his defense effort and whatever else he's doing right isn't enough to keep us in the game, play the kid. We need another guard for this reason alone. Sometimes you need a spark. He was a spark today.
That is a reasonable analysis. Frank did make a bad pass that was stolen, but then again, Cooney made a few as well. I guess my view is that I would rather have someone who will get the ball to others in spots to score when Cooney is off because he isn't the creater that FH is.
Cooney was awful in the first half last night, but it's hard to argue with JB's decision to keep him on the court. He was 2-4 in the second half and 3-4 from the line with 9 points. He also had 3 assists and 3 steals. Frank came in early and turned it over twice, and that sealed his fate. Plus he's just not there defensively yet.
At one point in the first half Frank was going to come in for Trevor and then G committed his second foul so Trevor stayed in and G came out.
How about now? Do you now see why Cooney is in there? Different second half for him. He doesn't know how to quit. His sheer drive to win got us two crucial loose balls at the end. He sank a shot in OT that I wondered why he took it. That is until the post game interview where JB stated he called that play for him and really didn't know why.