I'm talking like SMU-style paying recruits. In this hypothetical situation, nothing can ever be proven but we get a slap on the wrist of probation for a couple years for the violations that are found.
Count me in.
No, because I'd know, FOREVER, that it wasn't legitimate.
It's like saying you squatted 650 lbs, knowing full well that you didn't get anywhere close to parallel.
I'm talking like SMU-style paying recruits. In this hypothetical situation, nothing can ever be proven but we get a slap on the wrist of probation for a couple years for the violations that are found.
Count me in.
So Alabama's titles aren't legit? They've employed dirty practices to get top tier talent.
I'll cheat. Who cares if it isn't "legit", people saw you win.
The answer is for the P-5 conferences to break away from the NCAA and its nonsensical rules and investigations and form another organization. Pay the revenue-producing athletes and tell the G-5 to pound sand. Those folks who say that it can't be done because of March Madness, look at who most of the (non-automatic) selections are and you will see that most are from P-5 schools anyway.
Would you do it a NASA?I'm talking like SMU-style paying recruits. In this hypothetical situation, nothing can ever be proven but we get a slap on the wrist of probation for a couple years for the violations that are found.
Count me in.
The petty rules exist only because people try to find loopholes. Then the NCAA tries to close the loooholes to maintain some semblance of fairness. I bet it you look at every petty rule, you could find a loophole that was being exploited before the rule's existence.While I agree with your sentiment, the cold fact is that if the P5 break away, you limit the pool of contenders by half in football and by 80% in hoops. The second tier schools are the cannon fodder for the P5. By limiting the pool of fodder, you force many P5 teams into Rutger's role and force several top teams into the middle leaving only the richest teams to actually have a shot at the title.
Getting rid of the NCAA petty rules that only allow them to abuse private and small state schools and forcing good character people who will investigate AND punish the big state schools equally into the NCAA offices is a good solution.
On the other hand, it might help recruiting - but only in the near term. After you get caught you wind up like SMU.
Would you do it a NASA?
No, for the same reason I would never cheat on my wife even if it was guaranteed she would never find out.
Title stripped (yes, pun intended) and will (likely) never coach in the tournament again.This.
![]()
And he's worth $45 million.
This.
![]()
And he's worth $45 million.
I'm talking like SMU-style paying recruits. In this hypothetical situation, nothing can ever be proven but we get a slap on the wrist of probation for a couple years for the violations that are found.
Count me in.
The petty rules exist only because people try to find loopholes. Then the NCAA tries to close the loooholes to maintain some semblance of fairness. I bet it you look at every petty rule, you could find a loophole that was being exploited before the rule's existence.
Joking, or is your conscience that screwed up?
Everyday I get closer to being done with college sports. I'm already pretty apathetic about pro sports. Maybe I'll free up a bunch of free time in the future.