This is old news but good to see that the Mets were really interested in a AAA affiliation with a team based in New York. When Rochester went off the board, they re-upped with Las Vegas for 2 years.Only the Mets would do this.
This is old news but good to see that the Mets were really interested in a AAA affiliation with a team based in New York. When Rochester went off the board, they re-upped with Las Vegas for 2 years.
New York Mets, Las Vegas 51s extend affiliation deal
That is exactly when the Syracuse agreement with the Nationals expires. I hope this is not a coincidence..
That is absolutely not true. The Chiefs signed a 4 year agreement with the Nats in late 2013.Every deal I believe is for 2 years, so it is a coincidence. But i really hope they get out of Vegas.
This is old news but good to see that the Mets were really interested in a AAA affiliation with a team based in New York. When Rochester went off the board, they re-upped with Las Vegas for 2 years.
New York Mets, Las Vegas 51s extend affiliation deal
That is exactly when the Syracuse agreement with the Nationals expires. I hope this is not a coincidence. The Nats are rumored to want to have a AAA team in Richmond, which only has a AA team right now.
The best way for the Chiefs to solve their long term attendance problems is to become affiliated with the Mets. Las Vegas has consistently had good teams since working with the Mets, which always helps.
Hope it happens. We are fortunate to have a AAA franchise here, especially given how bad attendance has been. Getting a long term affiliation with a team that makes sense needs to happen. Let's do it!
And woo hoo on the Cespedes news. Let's turn some of our extra outfielders into relief pitchers and corner infielders now.
They want to. The Chiefs should want to get involved with the Mets. It makes a lot more sense than the Nationals. The Mets are on tv and radio every day here; people know the team and follow it.It makes no sense having a team in Vegas, its a logistical nightmare trying to ship players back and forth, they need to find someway to get their AAA team on the east coast somewhere.
That is absolutely not true. The Chiefs signed a 4 year agreement with the Nats in late 2013.
Nationals extend agreement with Syracuse Chiefs through 2018
I was really unhappy at that time because it prevented Syracuse from being a contender (like Rochester was) to land the Mets when their AAA affiliation was open after this past season.
Let's hope it finally happens in 2018 (the agreement would be reached in late in 2017).
I don't think Cespedes is a winner
in 2 seasons, he's carried us to a pennant and back-to-back postseasons. hard to be much more of a winner than that
Eh, we'll see how he does without the incentive of playing for a contract. He hits and he's liked by his teammates, so that's nice, but I think he's a lazy guy and a defensive liability. Lousy baserunner, too. There's a reason he played for four teams in four years and didn't have clubs jumping to sign him for multiple years.
possibly . . . if he has to play CF, then yes, he's a bit of a liability. As a LF, he's a plus defender, but one of Conforto, Grandy or Yo is going to have to start out of position in CF. I wonder if they will be able to keep Lagares now, or if they'll spin him, too, along with Bruce. Yo's deal probably means they are done on the FA market this year, so they'll have to use trades to fill the other holes.I think he's a lazy guy and a defensive liability.
possibly . . . if he has to play CF, then yes, he's a bit of a liability. As a LF, he's a plus defender, but one of Conforto, Grandy or Yo is going to have to start out of position in CF. I wonder if they will be able to keep Lagares now, or if they'll spin him, too, along with Bruce. Yo's deal probably means they are done on the FA market this year, so they'll have to use trades to fill the other holes.
Since they got Cespedes, the Mets are 32 games over .5000 when he played and 5 games under .500 when he didn't. The 4 year deal is good because he'll only be 34 at the end of it. Beyond that, you don't know about a free-swinging hitter..
I think they should be able to keep Lagares, I'm guessing some kind of a platoon with Lagares and Grandy in CF?
One thing we know, this FO really doesn't value defense a whole lot.
And for whatever it's worth, Cespedes really improved his BB rate this year. Of course I'm biased, but I think he's matured as a hitter
That works for me, I am very intrigued with Lagares, I think when healthy he could be a good player, he is a terrific defensive player.
Every catch he makes someone else would not have made is an extra base hit.
He is an Andrew Jones calibur Cf, he so smooth out there.
Eh, we'll see how he does without the incentive of playing for a contract. He hits and he's liked by his teammates, so that's nice, but I think he's a lazy guy and a defensive liability. Lousy baserunner, too. There's a reason he played for four teams in four years and didn't have clubs jumping to sign him for multiple years.
IMO the OF will look like this left to right: Ces, Grandy/Lagares, Conforto.
Conforto should be the starting RF for this team for the next 5-7 years.
Bruce now gets moved, obviously. Rumor is the Tigers have discussed a JD Martinez/Bruce swap.
Bruce now gets moved, obviously. Rumor is the Tigers have discussed a JD Martinez/Bruce swap.
Means he has higher value to other teams.. the last thing the Mets need is another all or nothing power hitter. They need to get some guys who can play station to station baseball and manufacture a run or two. I will be pissed if they trade Grandyman instead of Bruce because he at least has some ability to small ball.I don't think I want to trade Bruce, he is going into his walk year, I could see him having a big year.