You can’t grasp Notre Dame and USC are playing every year no matter.Two points: you have no more knowledge than anyone else on this board, we all have the same info. You assume the PAC will not adjust, that USC/ND will not make sacrifices for the good, and that USC would not play 9-1-1-1 (9 PAC, 1 ACC, 1 B1G and 1 ND).
There may be other resolutions, such as your own suggestion of 8 conference games. However, you present that no options are available and that issues cannot be worked out. Negotiations include give and take.
Anyway, if you cannot grasp this, then there is little use discussing it in this thread and it should be a new thread of how ND is derailing the CFB world.
You want to be idealistic go ahead. I am not going to drink that crap.
I am no smarter than anyone else.
I just don’t play Syracuse homer card I actually look at things in a neutral manner when it comes to these moves.
USC and Notre Dame are playing every year unless their is a pandemic.
You want to be idealistic about this. Go ahead but don’t tell me I am wrong and you are right.
You are just doing what I am doing giving an opinion.
Unlike you I am not going to assume it will work out when the information out suggests ND football will be treated as an ACC opponent somebody told that to Dan Wetzel he didn’t make it up.
Assume the PAC-12 will adjust what?
USC isn’t going to let the PAC-12 tell them they can’t play ND every year. You want to wait go ahead and wait again I acknowledged USC could do 8 Pac-12/ND/1 ACC/B1G.
What the hell does quote “there will not be an expansion of the number of he's played” mean?
All 3 commissioners said yesterday they weren’t in favor of an expanding the regular season from 12.
What are you saying?