Agree. This sounds like total fantasy. It's going to be a 40K seat stadium that serves SU football and bball, an 8-11K Crunch hockey arena, a 10-15K-seat concert venue, and have a retractable roof? I don't see how it could serve all those different masters. How do you reorder the place to fit each purpose? What if there are conflicts? Who gets priority? If they built this, it would be the first of its kind in the nation and it would cost a fortune.
Monster Jam
2-3 Country Acts
2-3 Rock Acts (Old Farts and New Bands)
1-2 Hip Hop Acts
1-2 UFC or WWE
If done right you can have acts for 25k and 45kseating configurations
Why does everyone keep saying this?? The dome is NOT OLD AT ALL. Not counting the two NFL stadiums, we are in by far the newest stadium.
ACC Stadium Openings...
Pitt, Heinz Field - 2001
Miami, Sun Life - 1987
Syracuse, Carrier Dome - 1980
Wake, BBT - 1968
NC State, Carter Finley - 1968
VaTech, Lane Stadium - 1965
BC, Alumni Stadium - 1957
Maryland, Byrd - 1950
FSU, Doake Campbell - 1950
Clemson, Memorial Stadium - 1942
Duke, Wallace Wade - 1929
UNC, Kenan Memorial - 1927
Georgia Tech, Bobby Dodd - 1913
UVA, Scott Stadium -1931
The DOme Sucks becuase it is too big for our fanbase and the sea of aluminum is AWFUL. The gray from the concrete is AWFUL. And the Lighting is terrible. If you simply changed the aluminum seats to Navy Blue or Orange ACTUAL SEATS, it would drastically improve the dome.
You want new Luxo suites, the gut the existing ones and start over. We have a unique venue for basketball. Playing in front of 34k is a big recruiting pitch. Lose that by moving to a new 20k basketball/hockey rink will impact us.
The dome just needs some sprucing up.
I haven't posted on this topic yet because I think I am clearly in the minority regarding my opinion.
Is anyone else struggling with the idea of dropping seating capacity from 50k to 40k? This tells me that administrators feel the interest in the football program has declined since 1978. This to me is the real problem.
Look I get that we've struggled to average 40k and that the dome is unsightly when it is half empty. But I think it sends the wrong message to the fanbase and the ACC when you downsize your NEW stadium. Aren't most new arenas trending upwards in seating capacity?
A 50k seat stadium is perfect for this program. With some continued success and an actual marketing campaign, they will see attendance rise. Not to mention that a 50k stadium gives the University greater revenue opportunity versus a 40k arena. Have a little faith in your program that if you build it properly and support it (IPF, marketing, etc) sufficiently that you will see the returns in the form of ticket sales and revenue.
FYI, the rumor that i had heard with the retractable roof was that it would add more seats when the roof was open, general admission.
How exactly would this work? Suppose they sold 2,000 GA seats in advance, and suppose it rained the day of the game forcing the roof to be closed. Would all the GA ticket holders be turned away at the gate?
Is there another retractable roof stadium open today that only sells GA seating when the roof is open?
I'm not sure if this is feasable.
The next 2 lines I heard from a friend after the Nova game. Take them for what they are worth. but they certainly got a lot more interesting after yesterday:
- hockey, bball and concerts are done all the time. there may be 1 or 2 football games that will conflict.
- lacrosse here too?
both of those were in a falcons stadium design.
- FYI, the rumor that i had heard with the retractable roof was that it would add more seats when the roof was open, general admission.
- i also heard bball would hold close to 40,000 - but could close of sections easily.
#SaveTheCarrierDome
I hate this. I love that the Dome is on campus. Downtown? You better make the old Dome a massive parking garage so more kids can have cars on campus so they can drive to the new stadium. You think student support is weak now? Good luck getting them to trek on public transport on a Centro bus to an Eastern Michigan football game at Noon on a cold Saturday.
The Dome being on campus is an incredibly unique and undervalued asset that connects this University to its athletic programs in a very unique way. I know it has its warts, and I know significant money upgrading may be cost ineffective, but I just think taking this stadium off campus is going to hurt in the long run.
Really don't like the potential move being discussed, but hey, just one man's opinion.
In the end, I think it is going to be build at Drumlins. Drumlins is an ideal location for the facility in many ways. It is close to 2 interstates, you can make access to the interstates happen without affecting neighborhoods nearby, the university already owns the land, there is plenty of space for additional structures that will help make the project more cost effective (hotel, mall, office, etc). And it is on campus.
What wealthy neighborhood? Behind sky top and drumlins is Jamesville quarry. I would imagine the west course would be leveled but the east course would be saved.Good luck getting the approval of a project like that so close to a very wealthy neighborhood. It will never happen.
What wealthy neighborhood? Behind sky top and drumlins is Jamesville quarry. I would imagine the west course would be leveled but the east course would be saved.
Across Nottingham Road.
I don't have strong opinions on this one way or another, but getting students to come to the game is a relative non-issue for me. As others have said, if they want to come to the games, they will find a way to get there. We couldn't get 100 students to roll outta their bed and stumble into the Carrier Dome, on campus, for a game against Eastern Michigan at noon on a cold Saturday, so who cares if we can't get the students to do the same thing to get to a game a mile off campus?
Engineering wise a stadium in the inner harbor would likely be much more expensive. There is very weak soil in that area and piles would need to be driven 100-200 ft down to rock to support the foundations as they were at Destiny. The Fayette site has much better soil conditions building may be able to be supported on simple spread and mat foundations on soil or excavated to rock or much shorter piles to rock. Just another note why this may be the site they are pushing.
In the end, I think it is going to be build at Drumlins. Drumlins is an ideal location for the facility in many ways. It is close to 2 interstates, you can make access to the interstates happen without affecting neighborhoods nearby, the university already owns the land, there is plenty of space for additional structures that will help make the project more cost effective (hotel, mall, office, etc). And it is on campus.
The next 2 lines I heard from a friend after the Nova game. Take them for what they are worth. but they certainly got a lot more interesting after yesterday:
- hockey, bball and concerts are done all the time. there may be 1 or 2 football games that will conflict.
- lacrosse here too?
both of those were in a falcons stadium design.
- FYI, the rumor that i had heard with the retractable roof was that it would add more seats when the roof was open, general admission.
- i also heard bball would hold close to 40,000 - but could close of sections easily.
New Retractable Roof Stadium built in Stockholm for $425M opened in 2012. Very surprised at that cost.
50K seating.