OburgOrange
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 21,690
- Like
- 65,206
Bruce who?No, but hopefully Bruce is.
Bruce who?No, but hopefully Bruce is.
I've read just about every post in this thread, during which time two quarters have passed in the Broncos-Chargers game.
My take:
A stadium next to Destiny on the Inner Harbor makes the most sense.
Tailgating needs to be a priority. I agree that we'll attract 5-7,000 more each game with a practical pregame setup.
Seating needs to be at least 45,000 for football with the ability to expand to 55,000 or more should the need arise. Don't be stupid.
Be careful with basketball seating. Think wisely. What we have now is unique. It's sets us apart from the rest. Could it be more intimate? Sure. But seating for less than 30,000 would be a huge mistake.
Retractable roof? If you're building a stadium with room for expansion, this isn't an issue.
Hey, with the way things move in CNY, I'll be singing the SU fight song from 6 feet under by the time this happens.
In the meantime, I'll enjoy the Fine Lot, having a slice at the Varsity, a beer at Faegan's and walking to the Dome. It's the Syracuse experience.
I jest, I jest...Don't start with me.
Sure.Beyoncé, Jay Z, Springsteen, One Direction, U2, Macklemore, Arcade Fire and then throw in some hot country acts and you've got a good stadium lineup
Why does everyone keep saying this?? The dome is NOT OLD AT ALL. Not counting the two NFL stadiums, we are in by far the newest stadium.
ACC Stadium Openings...
Pitt, Heinz Field - 2001
Miami, Sun Life - 1987
Syracuse, Carrier Dome - 1980
Wake, BBT - 1968
NC State, Carter Finley - 1968
VaTech, Lane Stadium - 1965
BC, Alumni Stadium - 1957
Maryland, Byrd - 1950
FSU, Doake Campbell - 1950
Clemson, Memorial Stadium - 1942
Duke, Wallace Wade - 1929
UNC, Kenan Memorial - 1927
Georgia Tech, Bobby Dodd - 1913
UVA, Scott Stadium -1931
The DOme Sucks becuase it is too big for our fanbase and the sea of aluminum is AWFUL. The gray from the concrete is AWFUL. And the Lighting is terrible. If you simply changed the aluminum seats to Navy Blue or Orange ACTUAL SEATS, it would drastically improve the dome.
You want new Luxo suites, the gut the existing ones and start over. We have a unique venue for basketball. Playing in front of 34k is a big recruiting pitch. Lose that by moving to a new 20k basketball/hockey rink will impact us.
The dome just needs some sprucing up.
Let me put in my vote for the Inner Harbor right now. You have such a great entertainment and travel infrastructure right there. 81 and 690 exits right there. Shuttles or cabs from the bus/train station would be a snap. You've got the mall, and it would connect the North Side of town to Franklin Square and Downtown. Plus plenty of parking (on flat ground!) to make for epic tailgating. No more hikes up the hill to go to the game. YAY!!
Yes and no, there are quite a few negative nellies voicing opinions here that have nothing to do with the city, their only vested interest is the university.Syracuse has loads of potential. The biggest thing that is holding Syracuse back is Syracusans.
Yeah that, and It would be totally badass if I could drive my boat up to the stadium for a game.
for freeI would like it to have a moving sidewalk that delivers me directly to my cushioned seat and have text ordered beers and food delivered directly to me.
Monster Jam
2-3 Country Acts
2-3 Rock Acts (Old Farts and New Bands)
1-2 Hip Hop Acts
1-2 UFC or WWE
If done right you can have acts for 25k and 45kseating configurations
Yes and no, there are quite a few negative nellies voicing opinions here that have nothing to do with the city, their only vested interest is the university.
I haven't posted on this topic yet because I think I am clearly in the minority regarding my opinion.
Is anyone else struggling with the idea of dropping seating capacity from 50k to 40k? This tells me that administrators feel the interest in the football program has declined since 1978. This to me is the real problem.
Look I get that we've struggled to average 40k and that the dome is unsightly when it is half empty. But I think it sends the wrong message to the fanbase and the ACC when you downsize your NEW stadium. Aren't most new arenas trending upwards in seating capacity?
A 50k seat stadium is perfect for this program. With some continued success and an actual marketing campaign, they will see attendance rise. Not to mention that a 50k stadium gives the University greater revenue opportunity versus a 40k arena. Have a little faith in your program that if you build it properly and support it (IPF, marketing, etc) sufficiently that you will see the returns in the form of ticket sales and revenue.
I think SU and Gross would love to get a new hoops facility like Louisville built, that was capped at 22k with more suites, preferred seating to generate more revenue. This year's hoops season ticket sales probably made some SU folks drool with the possibility of increasing ticket prices due to the demand.
I'm not disagreeing with you, I think that by nature most people are unwilling to embrace change as evidenced by the comments in this thread. I too am a resident of Syracuse, 50 years now and have seen the sabotage first hand. Most recently with the Route 81 debate, but that's a whole other story.I have lived here for 35 years. For the most part, Syracusans are reluctant to embrace change, oppose anything that sounds different, and will sabotage efforts by people who want progress.
-YES, probably a demand for more Luxury boxes and suitesHonest question here: is there sufficient demand in Syracuse to sell more preferential seating, luxury boxes, suites, etc.?
I get that this is one of the main reasons for most stadium upgrades--to get more preferred, higher price seating. But is that really something that CNY could support? I'm not trying to put down the city--I'm just asking the question.
PS--for the record, I hate the thought of a 22K basketball only facility.
I think its more political rather than people just being negative and not liking change. Vast majority of people don't trust government. And when they hear "higher taxes" they zone out before hearing the rest of what the higher taxes are being used for and just start in with the "NO NO NO NO."I have lived here for 35 years. For the most part, Syracusans are reluctant to embrace change, oppose anything that sounds different, and will sabotage efforts by people who want progress.
That's the spirit.I have lived here for 35 years. For the most part, Syracusans are reluctant to embrace change, oppose anything that sounds different, and will sabotage efforts by people who want progress.
If you were born 200 years ago I'll bet you would have said the Erie Canal will never work.