So we’d go back to an all alum coaching staff?I will find out more on who he is looking at for coaches but I know one name for sure that he’s been talking to to join the coaching staff - our favorite trash talking #23 Eric Devendorf
So we’d go back to an all alum coaching staff?I will find out more on who he is looking at for coaches but I know one name for sure that he’s been talking to to join the coaching staff - our favorite trash talking #23 Eric Devendorf
Think about the advantages we’ll get by hiring someone that already knows where Euclid Ave is located and has been inside varsity for a slice of pizza.
Give me Hodgson every single day of the year over Hop.The counter argument is that USF isn’t the same level as ACC (obviously) so has Hodgson proven he has won at the highest level? Some say no so you have unproven versus failure. What does everyone prefer ?
I think we're all going to have a bad case of ED if it's Hop and friends.I do think ED has has value being. on the staff no matter who is the coach so that’s a good start and he also knows his stuff Xs and Os wise.
Future coaching staff has Eric Devendorf, Brandon Triche, and MCW written all over it. Wouldn't have to leave Onondaga county to interview any of themThe decision makers at Syracuse must not know that other programs exist outside of Syracuse basketball.
Pat Ewing was a hall of famer who probably knew more basketball than anyone on this board. How’d that work out?Get ready stilettos…..
And who knows far more about basketball than anyone on this board.
In the meantime let’s keep on with the narrative that the only acceptable coaching hire is someone that most haven’t seen coach a game or hadn’t even heard of three months ago.
I’ll watch the process unfold and support the program next year with at least some level of trust that proper due diligence and an effective process will be followed.
Scheyer is a better coach than K. Duke is much better coached since he took over.If I had the choice between Duke's NIL/Revenue sharing money with Hopkins coaching and Scheyer and SU's NIL/Revenue sharing, I think I'd take Scheyer. Duke has elite talent, but Scheyer has shown he can coach his guys up. It's not easy to get a bunch of 19 & 20 year old super recruits to play hard for each other and then do it all over again the next season.
The counter argument is that USF isn’t the same level as ACC (obviously) so has Hodgson proven he has won at the highest level? Some say no so you have unproven versus failure. What does everyone prefer ?
...and twice Sunday.Give me Hodgson every single day of the year over Hop.
I just don't understand the mindset of getting great assistants to cover up for inadequacies of a potential HC. You shouldn't have to cover for the most basic aspect of a coach, which is coaching. Besides, most good assistants will move on sooner or later.Unless we can pay up and convince someone like Langel to be an assistant coach or co head coach with Hop where Hop gets the job I don’t see how this ever works out and even that hypothetical I just dropped makes me nauseous.
Amazing comeback.Like when we hired Red?
That's because there is no pitch for Hop other than "people like him." We're not splitting hairs based on resumes - when you factor in merit in even the slightest degree, Hop immediately becomes unhirable.You got Tim Leonard on espn syracuse basically saying ignore Hops record at UW, like record doesn't matter. Like what are we doing here?
He was a huge asset on the staff of TBT when he got T'd up.I do think ED has has value being on the staff no matter who is the coach so that’s a good start and he also knows his stuff Xs and Os wise.
And the response will be the money that Melo will commit is unprecedented, still they would say well he should do that for Hodgson or Schertz, much less risky investment with those two.That's because there is no pitch for Hop other than "people like him." We're not splitting hairs based on resumes - when you factor in merit in even the slightest degree, Hop immediately becomes unhirable.
You heard it from Kevin Sweeny at Sports Illustrated - the national media finds the idea a joke. The local media are the only ones that continue push this. Don't let them get away with it.
You mean Romar’s players that went 9-23 the year before Hop and ignoring that four of the top eight players on Hop’s first team were freshmen? Let’s do a little research before we post.Hop only won when he had Romar’s players.
Once he was down the the guys he himself could pull, his results dropped off.
And then once his east coast crootin ties dried up, he was dead in the water.
But sure!
He’s gonna do so much better this time, without having any great players to start off with, nor any recruiting ties anywhere anymore!!
sign me up!!
Nice year - now let's see the following five seasons?Even more impressive that Hop took “Romar’s players” from nine wins to 27 in two years, isn’t it?
I just don't understand the mindset of getting great assistants to cover up for inadequacies of a potential HC. You shouldn't have to cover for the most basic aspect of a coach, which is coaching. Besides, most good assistants will move on sooner or later.
And the facts behind his success at USF are that he has a NET of 52, his best wins are at home against Utah State and at Tulsa and USF has more Q3 losses than Syracuse this year.The counter argument is that USF isn’t the same level as ACC (obviously) so has Hodgson proven he has won at the highest level? Some say no so you have unproven versus failure. What does everyone prefer ?
His proclivity for cow bits... what was the deal?Long live the Donger!
I was the first caller into yesterdays show telling them I am concerned at even the thought of this. Steve and Pauls counter is its just an interview.That's because there is no pitch for Hop other than "people like him." We're not splitting hairs based on resumes - when you factor in merit in even the slightest degree, Hop immediately becomes unhirable.
You heard it from Kevin Sweeny at Sports Illustrated - the national media finds the idea a joke. The local media are the only ones that continue push this. Don't let them get away with it.
Im not advocating for it, just sharing a message that I’ve heard relentlessly from the actual decision makers and donors. Its the world we find ourselves in, and SU constantly being behind the ball yet again finds itself making this decision far more consequential than it already would have been. I hate it too.Hop would get one game to prove he's changed. The minute anyone sees shtty screens, ISO ball from an inefficient perimeter player, zone, and contested 20 footers then I know I'm out.
You cannot compare a team’s resume in the American Conference to an ACC team. That 52 in the Net that you are downplaying is THE HIGHEST NET RANKING IN PROGRAM HISTORY for them.And the facts behind his success at USF are that he has a NET of 52, his best wins are at home against Utah State and at Tulsa and USF has more Q3 losses than Syracuse this year.
Not saying he wouldn’t be very successful here because I don’t know. But the facts are the facts. He’s had a very good mid major season but if he loses in the conference tournament he’ll be watching the NCAAs just like us.