KellySyracuse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 15,575
- Like
- 42,891
that didn't take long
that didn't take long
I never would have heard of this person if it weren't for weirdos' lawn signs.
After nearly 40 years in business, downtown Syracuse's only pharmacy to close
Not the greatest news, but a seemingly perfect opportunity for Wegmans to debut a new urban grocery store concept, right?
After nearly 40 years in business, downtown Syracuse's only pharmacy to close
Not the greatest news, but a seemingly perfect opportunity for Wegmans to debut a new urban grocery store concept, right?
That's weird; Walgreens already applied to change the signage and I believe it's been installed. Wonder what happened.
If they can't be convinced to stay, I hope they sell. It's my understanding that a Rite Aid -affiliated entity has owned the building itself for decades. They did some facade work a few years ago but mostly they've let the building sit there with the top three floors vacant. This will be a very attractive redevelopment opportunity on a block that is close to turning the corner.
Anyone know what is under the ugly facade? It is an old building with nice brickwork and ornamental features underneath?That's weird; Walgreens already applied to change the signage and I believe it's been installed. Wonder what happened.
If they can't be convinced to stay, I hope they sell. It's my understanding that a Rite Aid -affiliated entity has owned the building itself for decades. They did some facade work a few years ago but mostly they've let the building sit there with the top three floors vacant. This will be a very attractive redevelopment opportunity on a block that is close to turning the corner.
Anyone know what is under the ugly facade? It is an old building with nice brickwork and ornamental features underneath?
Anyone know what is under the ugly facade? It is an old building with nice brickwork and ornamental features underneath?
In other news the airport was ready for a ribbon cutting today... yeeesh. I very recently flew in/out of Hancock and am disappointed. I am all for improving aesthetics, and heaven knows that airport really needed a face-lift to get with the times, but man it seems like a poorly conceived, poorly executed, rush job with no practical or functional improvement to the flying public.
Among my chief complaints, there really isn't anything to do if god forbid your flight is delayed a few hours (and I would know first hand). No business center, or green area to sit and relax in (even in the lobby). Speaking of the lobby, it's dark and uninviting. What's with all the fake rock facade everywhere? Maybe on the 'grand staircase' but it's plastered everywhere in the lobby and is just odd (at least to me). I'd rather have a cool design feature or water feature... but I digress. The painted ceiling which I guess is supposed to tie into the floor color scheme just makes it more dark and closed in feeling. Plus I am literally butt-hurt over the crappy hard seats by the gates. couldn't allocate some of the 63 mill for padded seats? I'll even throw in a couple bonus items: the newly installed signage inside the airport is brutal. Who thought a dark blue background with important info that's not illuminated or bright in any way was smart? It's totally illegible more than 10 feet away. Don't get me started on the craptastic canopy outside, that will be a real treat in the winter, or the still untouched garage. I really don't know how this ran close to 65 million, but someone got a nice payday out of this.
Too bad some of the funds didn't go to functional improvements, or enticing more airlines from Hubs, or getting SW into the area. Don't get me wrong - I fly fairly often- and have seen many airports in big and small markets alike, and while Hancock is way nicer than it was... it could have been even better (a lot better from a practicality standpoint) for the customers flying in and out everyday.
And this is a main ad for Cuomo. Meh. He’s made the least of the most.In other news the airport was ready for a ribbon cutting today... yeeesh. I very recently flew in/out of Hancock and am disappointed. I am all for improving aesthetics, and heaven knows that airport really needed a face-lift to get with the times, but man it seems like a poorly conceived, poorly executed, rush job with no practical or functional improvement to the flying public.
Among my chief complaints, there really isn't anything to do if god forbid your flight is delayed a few hours (and I would know first hand). No business center, or green area to sit and relax in (even in the lobby). Speaking of the lobby, it's dark and uninviting. What's with all the fake rock facade everywhere? Maybe on the 'grand staircase' but it's plastered everywhere in the lobby and is just odd (at least to me). I'd rather have a cool design feature or water feature... but I digress. The painted ceiling which I guess is supposed to tie into the floor color scheme just makes it more dark and closed in feeling. Plus I am literally butt-hurt over the crappy hard seats by the gates. couldn't allocate some of the 63 mill for padded seats? I'll even throw in a couple bonus items: the newly installed signage inside the airport is brutal. Who thought a dark blue background with important info that's not illuminated or bright in any way was smart? It's totally illegible more than 10 feet away. Don't get me started on the craptastic canopy outside, that will be a real treat in the winter, or the still untouched garage. I really don't know how this ran close to 65 million, but someone got a nice payday out of this.
Too bad some of the funds didn't go to functional improvements, or enticing more airlines from Hubs, or getting SW into the area. Don't get me wrong - I fly fairly often- and have seen many airports in big and small markets alike, and while Hancock is way nicer than it was... it could have been even better (a lot better from a practicality standpoint) for the customers flying in and out everyday.
Wait you mean the Governor and his minions rushed another project and did it half arsed? No way. Lipstick on a pig and the posturing and pontificating is absurd. Is it better - for sure, is it good enough. No way.
I'm sure it was just a coincidence both Rochester and Syracuse were done just before election day.
In other news the airport was ready for a ribbon cutting today... yeeesh. I very recently flew in/out of Hancock and am disappointed. I am all for improving aesthetics, and heaven knows that airport really needed a face-lift to get with the times, but man it seems like a poorly conceived, poorly executed, rush job with no practical or functional improvement to the flying public.
Among my chief complaints, there really isn't anything to do if god forbid your flight is delayed a few hours (and I would know first hand). No business center, or green area to sit and relax in (even in the lobby). Speaking of the lobby, it's dark and uninviting. What's with all the fake rock facade everywhere? Maybe on the 'grand staircase' but it's plastered everywhere in the lobby and is just odd (at least to me). I'd rather have a cool design feature or water feature... but I digress. The painted ceiling which I guess is supposed to tie into the floor color scheme just makes it more dark and closed in feeling. Plus I am literally butt-hurt over the crappy hard seats by the gates. couldn't allocate some of the 63 mill for padded seats? I'll even throw in a couple bonus items: the newly installed signage inside the airport is brutal. Who thought a dark blue background with important info that's not illuminated or bright in any way was smart? It's totally illegible more than 10 feet away. Don't get me started on the craptastic canopy outside, that will be a real treat in the winter, or the still untouched garage. I really don't know how this ran close to 65 million, but someone got a nice payday out of this.
Too bad some of the funds didn't go to functional improvements, or enticing more airlines from Hubs, or getting SW into the area. Don't get me wrong - I fly fairly often- and have seen many airports in big and small markets alike, and while Hancock is way nicer than it was... it could have been even better (a lot better from a practicality standpoint) for the customers flying in and out everyday.
Wait you mean the Governor and his minions rushed another project and did it half arsed? No way. Lipstick on a pig and the posturing and pontificating is absurd. Is it better - for sure, is it good enough. No way.
Hey...at least we got the coveted rain water recovery system!In other news the airport was ready for a ribbon cutting today... yeeesh. I very recently flew in/out of Hancock and am disappointed. I am all for improving aesthetics, and heaven knows that airport really needed a face-lift to get with the times, but man it seems like a poorly conceived, poorly executed, rush job with no practical or functional improvement to the flying public.
Among my chief complaints, there really isn't anything to do if god forbid your flight is delayed a few hours (and I would know first hand). No business center, or green area to sit and relax in (even in the lobby). Speaking of the lobby, it's dark and uninviting. What's with all the fake rock facade everywhere? Maybe on the 'grand staircase' but it's plastered everywhere in the lobby and is just odd (at least to me). I'd rather have a cool design feature or water feature... but I digress. The painted ceiling which I guess is supposed to tie into the floor color scheme just makes it more dark and closed in feeling. Plus I am literally butt-hurt over the crappy hard seats by the gates. couldn't allocate some of the 63 mill for padded seats? I'll even throw in a couple bonus items: the newly installed signage inside the airport is brutal. Who thought a dark blue background with important info that's not illuminated or bright in any way was smart? It's totally illegible more than 10 feet away. Don't get me started on the craptastic canopy outside, that will be a real treat in the winter, or the still untouched garage. I really don't know how this ran close to 65 million, but someone got a nice payday out of this.
Too bad some of the funds didn't go to functional improvements, or enticing more airlines from Hubs, or getting SW into the area. Don't get me wrong - I fly fairly often- and have seen many airports in big and small markets alike, and while Hancock is way nicer than it was... it could have been even better (a lot better from a practicality standpoint) for the customers flying in and out everyday.
I was in the Rochester airport two weeks ago and said to myself wow it seems like this renovation is taking forever. I turned on the news last night and was blown away when they reported that it was finished. It certainly did not look finished when I was there a week before.I'm sure it was just a coincidence both Rochester and Syracuse were done just before election day.
Like the Amphitheatre, like the Expo Center, like virtually everything the county executive conspired with Cuomo to "improve." Slightly better, but so much worse than what that money could have bought. With the airport, the canopy situation is maybe the most ridiculous of all: in this climate, you're removing a huge, functional, drive-in roof...for what purpose?
Planning and public input are valuable. In a community with a lot of real needs, we pissed away a lot of money without them.