orangefog
Certified Message Board Genius
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,905
- Like
- 61,798
Did the Syracuse Twitter Army just wage war against Mark Emmert and the NCAA?
Did the Syracuse Twitter Army just wage war against Mark Emmert and the NCAA?
I don't believe they do it in a vacuum and rely on experts in education.
I know that you have dug your heels in on this one but " rely onexperts in education" --- you have to be kidding!
careful jekelish, that tone is making you look madLook, I fully understand there's more going on here than we're seeing.
But I don't want to hear about the "education experts." It's not about that. It's about what is or isn't in the NCAA's wheelhouse. You're telling me they couldn't be relying on "education experts" with regard to UNC? They're telling one of their own member schools "you're cool, we don't wanna judge" while at the same time telling a SCHOOL ON A DIFFERENT CONTINENT what is or isn't acceptable education.
Look, I fully understand there's more going on here than we're seeing.
But I don't want to hear about the "education experts." It's not about that. It's about what is or isn't in the NCAA's wheelhouse. You're telling me they couldn't be relying on "education experts" with regard to UNC? They're telling one of their own member schools "you're cool, we don't wanna judge" while at the same time telling a SCHOOL ON A DIFFERENT CONTINENT what is or isn't acceptable education.
The part that kills me, is the kid has shown the aptitude since coming to this country. He has been a great student and did well on the standardized tests. He has displayed the capacity to be a college student, far more than some American students, why concentrate on a single class that he had no control over. Do they think he will not do well based on that class when he has shown a tremendous ability to learn in the years since? Where is the logic?Look, I fully understand there's more going on here than we're seeing.
But I don't want to hear about the "education experts." It's not about that. It's about what is or isn't in the NCAA's wheelhouse. You're telling me they couldn't be relying on "education experts" with regard to UNC? They're telling one of their own member schools "you're cool, we don't wanna judge" while at the same time telling a SCHOOL ON A DIFFERENT CONTINENT what is or isn't acceptable education.
careful jekelish, that tone is making you look mad
FairfaxOrange said:For whatever reason Bees can't be wrong on this one. No matter how obviously wrong the NCAA is.
I don't believe they do it in a vacuum and rely on experts in education.
That are probably only available at certain times because of meetings and not doing any real work...
Conspiracy theory: That's why the NCAA has dragged their feet on this.People have suggested Diagne possibly joining the team in the 2nd semester. One question/point I have about that is IF Diagne is not cleared for the 1st semester, we'll have 10 scholarship players. At that point, won't our scholarship sanctions go into effect for the 2015-16 season, making us unable to give Diagne a scholarship (our 11th) for the 2nd semester??
Down to typing with one finger but otherwise fine. Will try to se you in Nassau this fall.Hey stranger. How ya been?
This^^^The part that kills me, is the kid has shown the aptitude since coming to this country. He has been a great student and did well on the standardized tests. He has displayed the capacity to be a college student, far more than some American students, why concentrate on a single class that he had no control over. Do they think he will not do well based on that class when he has shown a tremendous ability to learn in the years since? Where is the logic?
Conspiracy theory: That's why the NCAA has dragged their feet on this.
According to Wiki, Emmert's high school (Fife) had some limitations - hence my email.my only contribution to this thread - memmert@ncaa.org