JarHeadJim
I have never won sheet!
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 127,864
- Like
- 394,271
I guess our 16 point head-to-head win over Nova while having the same number of loses means nothing.
Or maybe it's the fact that win against Nova was a long time ago now, and SU has lost 3 of their last 4 games, while Nova hasn't.I guess our 16 point head-to-head win over Nova while having the same number of loses means nothing.
I get that. Some people think the poll should only reflect the last 2 weeks play...and some don't.Or maybe it's the fact that win against Nova was a long time ago now, and SU has lost 3 of their last 4 games, while Nova hasn't.
You can't look at the polls in a vacuum.
It's like I heard Ron Burgundy say once - When in Rome...The polls mean as much right now as...well, I'm not too good with analogies. But the polls are not so meaningful right now is what I'm getting at.
I get that. Some people think the poll should only reflect the last 2 weeks play...and some don't.
Kentucky still ranked. LOL
Congrats to UVA on getting into the top 5 I hope they can get some top recruits based on this year and become annual top ACC team. The conference needs its flagship public universities like Virginia and North Carolina to be good teams to get better respect nationally. Its important these schools turn around their football and basketball programs. I honestly could careless about the rankings I would fall out of the top 10 if we would get Buffalo-MSG and Jerami Grant more healthy.
Just saw Jimmy Dykes tweet he can't believe they are a 6 seed. Come on Jimmy , you're lucky they arent a 10 seed.
Dude you know I know Buffalo was wrapped up I was talking about Buffalo-MSG back to back. We are either going to be in the East or Midwest regions. South will be UVA or Duke.I would take the status quo. 2 seed in the east behind kansas is fine with me
And for the last time Buffalo is a done deal.
Does this mean Villanova gets the #2 seed in the east?
I guess our 16 point head-to-head win over Nova while having the same number of loses means nothing.
No.