- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,172
- Like
- 195,236
Why would the article include #10 which was said a year ago?
The DO may need to rethink their 10th 'thing'.
Odd how #10 was a quote from 2018 how there would be no impact in terms of the Carrier name. Why include a quote from 2018?
Why would the article include #10 which was said a year ago?
Inverted funnels will be happening.I know Mark and others said the Fine Mess Tailgate was getting bigger but don't you think the crane is excessive for setup?
I am curious how the post office delivered the underwear models.When I was young, my mom would give me the catalogues from Sears, Montgomery Ward and Spiegel, I think it was. I would lay on the floor with a pen or a marker and circle all the things that I thought were cool. That became my wish list. It was like the 1960s version of ordering from Amazon today.
Yeah. All that income (which is taxed by NYC) all those new homes purchased (taxed by NYC) all the new goods and services purchased (taxed by NYC), all the construction jobs, equipment sales, materials sales, lunches and breakfasts and snacks purchased by the construction workers. Projected losses of $27B in revenue to NYC.How was it a horrendous deal for the city?
Has that been made public? I hadn't heard they scrapped the moveable scoreboard.That article was old and outdated.
Pretty positive the scoreboard plans have been scrapped and it will be a non-moveable scoreboard...gotta love design builds. These plans could change 100 times from now
HaI am curious how the post office delivered the underwear models.
Why would the article include #10 which was said a year ago?
How was the city "building Amazon's HQ"? You understand the differences between tax credits and tangible capital, correct? I ask this because many politicians who opposed the Amazon move actually thought that NYC was giving Amazon billions of dollars.The giant tax break/credit is the obvious issue, the city shouldn't be building Amazon's HQ with the amount of money they make. The "25,000 new jobs" were over a 10 year period, and NYC already adds more way new jobs annually. Prices for apartments/rents are consistently going up, this just exacerbates that problem, and puts more strain on an already struggling transit system.
There was no commitment from Amazon to do anything that benefited the city.
Yes, I am very much aware that NYC isn't actually giving Amazon billions of dollars.How was the city "building Amazon's HQ"? You understand the differences between tax credits and tangible capital, correct? I ask this because many politicians who opposed the Amazon move actually thought that NYC was giving Amazon billions of dollars.
Why are increasing rent prices a bad thing? Higher valuation = higher property taxes and income taxes, right? Why can't these be redistributed accordingly as the NYC politicians see fit?
It's NYC. If any city can absorb $27B in misses revenue, it's NYC. Especially because there's always development going on here.Yeah. All that income (which is taxed by NYC) all those new homes purchased (taxed by NYC) all the new goods and services purchased (taxed by NYC), all the construction jobs, equipment sales, materials sales, lunches and breakfasts and snacks purchased by the construction workers. Projected losses of $27B in revenue to NYC.
What will NYC lose after Amazon HQ2 deal crumbles?
Agree and to your point it's actually $13B in missed revenue for NYC ($14B was to be state taxes), assuming that HQ2 fully delivered on all of its job promises. Amazon's commitment to Queens infrastructure/transportation improvements was unimpressive - it was piggybacking on $300M in spending by NYC and insisting on "helipads" for its execs. Lots of jobs, but lots of headaches and sacrifices. I think both parties will be ok here.It's NYC. If any city can absorb $27B in misses revenue, it's NYC. Especially because there's always development going on here.
It's NYC. If any city can absorb $27B in misses revenue, it's NYC. Especially because there's always development going on here.
That is ridiculous. That area where the project was set to go needed that in the worst way. It’s slums and vacant building falling apart. The fact that those jobs which would have benefited the locals went away over tax breaks is absurd. People there are struggling and they could have used that to get out from a bad situation. You’re thinking is extremely short sided. What would help someone more? free hand outs or an actual job. This country wastes more tax dollars in worse ways then stimulating employment opportunities and on one of the largest companies in the country.There's a huge difference to the impact that something like this would have on Syracuse than NYC. If Amazon chose Newark it probably would have been a positive for that area too.
Still, Amazon has a lot of questionable business practices I struggle to get on board with which is why I don't use them for things I can buy at a local shop.
The giant tax break/credit is the obvious issue, the city shouldn't be building Amazon's HQ with the amount of money they make. The "25,000 new jobs" were over a 10 year period, and NYC already adds more way new jobs annually. Prices for apartments/rents are consistently going up, this just exacerbates that problem, and puts more strain on an already struggling transit system.
There was no commitment from Amazon to do anything that benefited the city.
This line from the article confused me. Are they referring to the camp with the old roof?
...
This line from the article confused me. Are they referring to the camp with the old roof?
The new roof will make the building more transparent, and over the summer, Wildhack said men’s basketball head coach Jim Boeheim was able to run camps without turning on artificial lighting until 6 or 7 p.m.
So they're adding these in addition to the courts across the elevated bridge where volleyball, racquetball & squash are?
Thanks for proving my point. If Amazon gets a giant tax break, why then does it matter if NYC politicians can't properly allocate tax money?Yes, I am very much aware that NYC isn't actually giving Amazon billions of dollars.
Laughing out loud that you think NYC politicians will properly allocate tax money... There's still no money for the Gateway tunnel, can't wait until the region shuts down when that collapses! The subway is an absolute disaster but good thing we have swipeless entry at like 10 stations!