I wonder if they win today, if they can get a brace for him cleared by the NCAA in time for the S16.
Exactly. They showed the brace. Would not have posed a risk to anyone elseThe NCAA is the absolute worst. Unless the cast was bionic and guaranteed 60% from the field foh. NCAA needs to be gone.
Is #3 for Butler wearing timbs?
Don't ruin what's left of his career for 20-30 minutes and a chance of advancing. He has to live the rest of his life with the effects of the injury.
Want a do over on this one?Oh man. Just finding this out. Terrible news. Good player and kid.
If you read the story, it sounds like he was told by the health office he was good to go. IF true, can't blame the kid.
Blame goes to both partners for not protecting themselves.
Indiana's comaprative negligence statute is here. Overview of the Indiana Negligence Law - Hensley Legal Group, PC
I could see a jury finding the woman (as compared to him) to be at least half responsible, if not more, for not insisting that a condom be used. They could find 50% each, as well. STDs are a known risk, and precautions could have been taken by her, as there is no allegation of force.
Will be interesting to see how the medical comes out. I am not sure she has legal standing to sue the medical staff.
You know a lot about STD’s.He was tested for chlamydia and found positive and treated then retested. Chlamydia is diagnosed via a urine sample. Herpes is not, it is diagnosed via a blood sample or swab if there are open sores.
You know a lot about STD’s.
I knew there would be a logical explanation, but I was hoping for a more colorful one.lol. I asked my wife who's a nurse.
How could she possibly be more than 50% responsible?If you read the story, it sounds like he was told by the health office he was good to go. IF true, can't blame the kid.
Blame goes to both partners for not protecting themselves.
Indiana's comaprative negligence statute is here. Overview of the Indiana Negligence Law - Hensley Legal Group, PC
I could see a jury finding the woman (as compared to him) to be at least half responsible, if not more, for not insisting that a condom be used. They could find 50% each, as well. STDs are a known risk, and precautions could have been taken by her, as there is no allegation of force.
Will be interesting to see how the medical comes out. I am not sure she has legal standing to sue the medical staff.
I had a strange feeling when I saw this thread bumped that it had to due with an STD lawsuit.