Capt. Tuttle
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- Messages
- 26,738
- Like
- 38,735
PubliclyYeah, you're right. But the commitment happened pretty much out of the blue.
PubliclyYeah, you're right. But the commitment happened pretty much out of the blue.
If this is what we’re doing (I don’t think it is), then we’re not a top 50 program. The only thing our fans and this board is grasping into is “we’re top 10 this and that, close to a blue blood, etc etc” you know the deal then that needs to stop, top 10 programs, scratch that, top 25 programs aren’t taking WAC guys and plugging them in as their top players.Agree just pointing out that the school a transfer comes from
better guys available in our price range? Trey’s college production is pretty good even if the WAC level of competition is beneath the ACC.
If this is what we’re doing (I don’t think it is), then we’re not a top 50 program. The only thing our fans and this board is grasping into is “we’re top 10 this and that, close to a blue blood, etc etc” you know the deal then that needs to stop, top 10 programs, scratch that, top 25 programs aren’t taking WAC guys and plugging them in as their top players.
I have people coming at me saying how great JJ is, then I’m hearing we need a WAC guy to play over him, like where are we? We’re better than this and if it’s a budget issue, we’re cooked and if I were Red I’d be looking for another job because he won’t have success here.
I know the numbers game isn’t fair to Chance, but if you look at the numbers of every starter here and even curve them for improvement we’re a 10 win team right now, we’re not good. Are they young, sure, but we let three 5th year seniors walk, we can’t use the young excuse, we knew what we needed and as of now (not counting on this current roster sticking and believe in Red) and we’ve not gone after any experience, one guy who was injured and one guy who I don’t care what anyone says, had an awful year. This roster was much worse than last years and it’s not close. I really hope a lot of moves are going to happen.
You keep saying that. I hope you are right but I fear you are not.There will be better guys available. We don’t need to rush this.
As a week ago I believe 250 players declared for the draft. 60-80 will get invited to the combine. A large portion who don't I would imagine put their name in the portal if they haven't already.You keep saying that. I hope you are right but I fear you are not.
LOLSub 65% free throw shooter, sub 30% from three, more turnovers than assists, rebounding non existent, not even a steal a game.
Sorry, awful year, Joe never had a year even close to that.
Jesse good riddance, Joe was awful, though amirite?
That's sort of the point I'm making. Both commitments came out of the blue in a way publicly. Therefore, we shouldn't worry about the openings we have. Yet.Publicly
You must be fun at parties.Sub 65% free throw shooter, sub 30% from three, more turnovers than assists, rebounding non existent, not even a steal a game.
Sorry, awful year, Joe never had a year even close to that.
Jesse good riddance, Joe was awful, though amirite?
What’s the LOL? Triche lost minutes the next year and was an excellent defender.LOL
JJ Starling (FR) -- 11.2 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 1.1 apg, 42% FG%, 30% 3FG, 64% FT%
Brandon Triche (SO) -- 11.1 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 2.9 apg, 42% FG%, 33% 3FG%, 84% FT%
Triche a little better playmaker. Same level scorer, relatively close percentage outside of FT% (but Triche's career FT% is much closer to 64 than 84).
I was probably banging the cheerleaders at the parties you weren’t invited to.You must be fun at parties.
I get your concerns about JJ. I have my own. I didn't think he looked all that great when we played them. His shot looked better in HS and for as great an athlete he was he was about as bad on defense as Girard. The hope is we tap into the potential he had coming out of high school.What’s the LOL? Triche lost minutes the next year and was an excellent defender.
Lot of truth in this.If this is what we’re doing (I don’t think it is), then we’re not a top 50 program. The only thing our fans and this board is grasping into is “we’re top 10 this and that, close to a blue blood, etc etc” you know the deal then that needs to stop, top 10 programs, scratch that, top 25 programs aren’t taking WAC guys and plugging them in as their top players.
I have people coming at me saying how great JJ is, then I’m hearing we need a WAC guy to play over him, like where are we? We’re better than this and if it’s a budget issue, we’re cooked and if I were Red I’d be looking for another job because he won’t have success here.
I know the numbers game isn’t fair to Chance, but if you look at the numbers of every starter here and even curve them for improvement we’re a 10 win team right now, we’re not good. Are they young, sure, but we let three 5th year seniors walk, we can’t use the young excuse, we knew what we needed and as of now (not counting on this current roster sticking and believe in Red) and we’ve not gone after any experience, one guy who was injured and one guy who I don’t care what anyone says, had an awful year. This roster was much worse than last years and it’s not close. I really hope a lot of moves are going to happen.
And you know Starling is NOT an excellent defender?What’s the LOL? Triche lost minutes the next year and was an excellent defender.
i was wondering the same thing when people said this on April 1st, well were now past May 1st and...You keep saying that. I hope you are right but I fear you are not.
Hoping for this as well, it can happen, but like you I’m looking at last year. Totally different level and last years data is far more important than high school.I get your concerns about JJ. I have my own. I didn't think he looked all that great when we played them. His shot looked better in HS and for as great an athlete he was he was about as bad on defense as Girard. The hope is we tap into the potential he had coming out of high school.
You keep saying that. I hope you are right but I fear you are not.
Turnover is what happens in college sports. Losing 3 guys off a team that wasn't good enough for the NIT and replacing them with highly sought after 4* and 5* guys is good. I don't think we should be in the business of writing off anyone because of one year or what conference they play in.If this is what we’re doing (I don’t think it is), then we’re not a top 50 program. The only thing our fans and this board is grasping into is “we’re top 10 this and that, close to a blue blood, etc etc” you know the deal then that needs to stop, top 10 programs, scratch that, top 25 programs aren’t taking WAC guys and plugging them in as their top players.
I have people coming at me saying how great JJ is, then I’m hearing we need a WAC guy to play over him, like where are we? We’re better than this and if it’s a budget issue, we’re cooked and if I were Red I’d be looking for another job because he won’t have success here.
I know the numbers game isn’t fair to Chance, but if you look at the numbers of every starter here and even curve them for improvement we’re a 10 win team right now, we’re not good. Are they young, sure, but we let three 5th year seniors walk, we can’t use the young excuse, we knew what we needed and as of now (not counting on this current roster sticking and believe in Red) and we’ve not gone after any experience, one guy who was injured and one guy who I don’t care what anyone says, had an awful year. This roster was much worse than last years and it’s not close. I really hope a lot of moves are going to happen.
He isn’t a good defender, did you watch them play any other games than the ones he played against us?And you know Starling is NOT an excellent defender?
He was a freshman playing big minutes at a high level, and averaged double figures.
He will be a very good player for Syracuse.
We have a high ceiling I believe, but we also have a catastrophic floor, don’t think I’m out of line saying that.
Agreed, and it’s 3 seniors, Symir could be a huge loss if we don’t get another guard.Lot of truth in this.
I like JJ and Chance but one issue in our portal additions is we have not gotten older or more experienced. JJ had a nice fr. season but we havent added that accomplished player who has done it for 3 years. We chose not/didnt retain our 2 seniors. We will see what happens, I hope were not just giving the remaining scholarship to walk ons or legacy offspring.
Symir is not a loss at all, let alone a huge one. Most D1 guards could come in and provide his impact (or lack there of), there’s a reason he’s at Binghamton,Agreed, and it’s 3 seniors, Symir could be a huge loss if we don’t get another guard.
Not belittling any kid, just need to see results.Turnover is what happens in college sports. Losing 3 guys off a team that wasn't good enough for the NIT and replacing them with highly sought after 4* and 5* guys is good. I don't think we should be in the business of writing off anyone because of one year or what conference they play in.
I'm also not in the business of writing off kids who want to be here vs kids who chased a bag to some hillbilly town
Who’s our third guard right now? Copeland? Yikes.Symir is not a loss at all, let alone a huge one. Most D1 guards could come in and provide his impact (or lack there of), there’s a reason he’s at Binghamton,
Forgot about him too, but I am ok with that and even ok if they roll the dice on another HS guard to replace him since he was only a spot duty role player. Thought he would have been more in his 2nd year on the hill last year.Agreed, and it’s 3 seniors, Symir could be a huge loss if we don’t get another guard.
Agreed, and it’s 3 seniors, Symir could be a huge loss if we don’t get another guard.