Kobe was pretty bad down the stretch, but at least he wants it. Durant took a big three, missed it, then made a runner to take the lead so good for Durant. BTW, that last Laker play was horrible...why is Kobe on the other side of the floor with noone near Metta besides Blake?
Blake at least got a good shot, though they didn't need the 3.
It looked like they were trying to bring Kobe to the ball, but he saw it wasn't there and broke it off and floated to the other corner? Not sure if he broke it off or that was the play; either way it's a tough pass for Artest to make over a few defenders to the opposite corner.
Kobe Bryant is a coward...and a decoy. Steve Blake took the last shot...
Some people forget that every player on the court is a professional nba player. If Blake and chalmers his those shots, then what? Some of you are comical. Let's keep this thread going it amuses the hell out of me.
Some people forget that every player on the court is a professional nba player. If Blake and chalmers his those shots, then what? Some of you are comical. Let's keep this thread going it amuses the hell out of me.
There is no player in the NBA that I like watching play more than LeBron. He is huge, athletic, and remarkably skilled for his size. Wonderful passer with a great feel for the game.
That said, it is 'put up or shut up time' for him. He needs to figure out how to win a few championships.
maybe you should read it again, because I didn't "mention LeBron in the same breath as Jordan" . . . I mentioned him in the same breath as Oscar Robertson. I think they are very similar, in the sense that they are terrific all around players but not necessarily specialists that allow them to absolutely dominate in one particular fashion. So, even if he never wins a title, I think LeBron is the rough equivalent of the Big O - a Top Ten or Fifteen player, but not top 5. You could also note that I wrote that, without a title, LeBron is still IMO better than about half of the players on my list of 15. That puts him at about 7 or 8, not top 5 (i.e., not at Jordan's level).how could you even mention lebron in the same breath as jordan if he gets zero rings?
the flip side to that being that, with Melo, you are demonstrably much less likely to be in a meaningful game that is tied with 30 seconds remaining.I'd rather have Melo in a tied game with 30 seconds to play.
the flip side to that being that, with Melo, you are demonstrably much less likely to be in a meaningful game that is tied with 30 seconds remaining.
I would agree about the two being great all around players. However, Oscar was a much smoother player than LeBron. I really don't think there has been another player that parlayed their strength and ability the way LBJ does. Having seen them both in their prime, Oscar was more enjoyable to watch for me.maybe you should read it again, because I didn't "mention LeBron in the same breath as Jordan" . . . I mentioned him in the same breath as Oscar Robertson. I think they are very similar, in the sense that they are terrific all around players but not necessarily specialists that allow them to absolutely dominate in one particular fashion. So, even if he never wins a title, I think LeBron is the rough equivalent of the Big O - a Top Ten or Fifteen player, but not top 5. You could also note that I wrote that, without a title, LeBron is still IMO better than about half of the players on my list of 15. That puts him at about 7 or 8, not top 5 (i.e., not at Jordan's level).
The circle jerks when Miami loses provide a decent amount of morning-after entertainment
I like how a partial statement from Lebron afrter the loss DEFINES HIS LEGACY.
But this is all just an appetized for the haters that precedes Miami's title.
"It doesn't count becasue it's Wade's team."
"Lockout shortened season."
"BUT GUYS DERRICK ROSE"
"The NBA is fixed."
et cetera
LeBron hate aside -- Erik Spoelstra is not a good coach. The Heat look lost playing against a disciplined team.