realcusefan888
Walk On
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 145
- Like
- 13
the positives:
1. REPRESENTS THE PROGRAM WELL
2. A GREAT GUY
3. HAS RETURNED US TO RESPECTABILITY (SIMPLY D/T POINT #4,5)
4. HAS ELEVATED THE CONDITIONING OF THIS TEAM
5. IS ORGANIZED
6. HAS NFL EXPERIENCE HELPING WITH RECRUITING (MAYBE?)
the negatives:
1. APPARENTLY ZERO ABILITY TO MOTIVATE 18-22 YO BEFORE TAKING THE FIELD
2. IS STUBBORN IN TERMS OF PLAY CALLING STICKING WITH GAMEPLAN WHEN IT WAS A POOR PLAN IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HAS ALREADY FAILED FOR AN ENTIRE QUARTER.
3. IS HE NORV TURNER? (AND AT WORSE, AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL); A COORDINATOR/PLAY CALLER UNABLE TO MOTIVATE AND RELATE PERSONALLY.
4. WHILE HE PREACHES DISCIPLINE THIS AREA IS LACKING ON AND OFF THE FIELD WE HAVE OFF FIELD ISSUES AS COMMON AS THE BIG BOYS AND MUST LEAD THE CONFERENCE IN PERSONAL FOULS
5. LACKS THE FIRE, THE FIRE I SAW IN YEAR ONE WHEN HE DIRECTLY ADDRESSED A PERSONAL FOUL ON THE SIDELINE IN A KIDS FACE. SORRY GUYS, NOT LOOKING FOR BRIAN KELLY, BUT I WATCH ALOT OF COLLEGE FB AND SOME JUICE ON THE SIDELINES FILTERS THROUGH THE KIDS.
* WE HAVE PLAYED ONE SOLID 4 QUARTER GAME THIS YEAR OUT OF 5 WINS AND I TRULY BELIEVE THAT THE WVU WIN CAN BE EXPLAINED SIMPLY BY THEM BEING LESS PREPARED THAN WE WERE COMING OUT OF THE TUNNEL AND SOME TEAMS JUST GET JUMPED IN THE DOME ATMOSPHERE AS RUTGERS DID 2 YEARS AGO.
*"HACKONE" CONTINUES TO PLAY OFFENSE STUBBORNLY! THE USF GAME AS WELL AS THE RUTGERS GAME WAS PURE COACHES EGO...TRYING TO POUND THE BALL WHEN IT ISNT THERE. OFFENSE IS ABOUT DECEPTION AND SPEED AND WE DO HAVE THE TALENT, OUR APPROACH IS POOR. WE DONT PLAY TO BE THE AGGRESSOR AND JUMP OUT AHEAD BY 2 SCORES AND THINK ABOUT IT...WHEN WE PLAY AN OFFENSE THATS BEEN STRUGGLING COMING IN (RUTGERS, USF, RHODDY, UCONN) WE PLAY OFFENSE LIKE WE ONLY NEED TO SCORE 17 POINTS. ITS SO APPARENT, AND WE WILL SEE THE SAME THING AGAINST CINNCY SINCE COLLAROS IS OUT AND THE BACKUP IS INEPT.
1. REPRESENTS THE PROGRAM WELL
2. A GREAT GUY
3. HAS RETURNED US TO RESPECTABILITY (SIMPLY D/T POINT #4,5)
4. HAS ELEVATED THE CONDITIONING OF THIS TEAM
5. IS ORGANIZED
6. HAS NFL EXPERIENCE HELPING WITH RECRUITING (MAYBE?)
the negatives:
1. APPARENTLY ZERO ABILITY TO MOTIVATE 18-22 YO BEFORE TAKING THE FIELD
2. IS STUBBORN IN TERMS OF PLAY CALLING STICKING WITH GAMEPLAN WHEN IT WAS A POOR PLAN IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HAS ALREADY FAILED FOR AN ENTIRE QUARTER.
3. IS HE NORV TURNER? (AND AT WORSE, AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL); A COORDINATOR/PLAY CALLER UNABLE TO MOTIVATE AND RELATE PERSONALLY.
4. WHILE HE PREACHES DISCIPLINE THIS AREA IS LACKING ON AND OFF THE FIELD WE HAVE OFF FIELD ISSUES AS COMMON AS THE BIG BOYS AND MUST LEAD THE CONFERENCE IN PERSONAL FOULS
5. LACKS THE FIRE, THE FIRE I SAW IN YEAR ONE WHEN HE DIRECTLY ADDRESSED A PERSONAL FOUL ON THE SIDELINE IN A KIDS FACE. SORRY GUYS, NOT LOOKING FOR BRIAN KELLY, BUT I WATCH ALOT OF COLLEGE FB AND SOME JUICE ON THE SIDELINES FILTERS THROUGH THE KIDS.
* WE HAVE PLAYED ONE SOLID 4 QUARTER GAME THIS YEAR OUT OF 5 WINS AND I TRULY BELIEVE THAT THE WVU WIN CAN BE EXPLAINED SIMPLY BY THEM BEING LESS PREPARED THAN WE WERE COMING OUT OF THE TUNNEL AND SOME TEAMS JUST GET JUMPED IN THE DOME ATMOSPHERE AS RUTGERS DID 2 YEARS AGO.
*"HACKONE" CONTINUES TO PLAY OFFENSE STUBBORNLY! THE USF GAME AS WELL AS THE RUTGERS GAME WAS PURE COACHES EGO...TRYING TO POUND THE BALL WHEN IT ISNT THERE. OFFENSE IS ABOUT DECEPTION AND SPEED AND WE DO HAVE THE TALENT, OUR APPROACH IS POOR. WE DONT PLAY TO BE THE AGGRESSOR AND JUMP OUT AHEAD BY 2 SCORES AND THINK ABOUT IT...WHEN WE PLAY AN OFFENSE THATS BEEN STRUGGLING COMING IN (RUTGERS, USF, RHODDY, UCONN) WE PLAY OFFENSE LIKE WE ONLY NEED TO SCORE 17 POINTS. ITS SO APPARENT, AND WE WILL SEE THE SAME THING AGAINST CINNCY SINCE COLLAROS IS OUT AND THE BACKUP IS INEPT.