Millhouse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 29,734
- Like
- 35,596
LevyHave you ever liked a football coach of one of your teams?
LevyHave you ever liked a football coach of one of your teams?
you talk about how unsuccessful the bills have been then you criticize me for not liking those coaches.For Millhouse to like a coach he has to be as smart as Millhouse
Nobody is as smart as Millhouse
Therefore Millhouse can never like a coach.
People still don't acknowledge the fact that Doug had a losing Big East record 11-17, in OOC games against P-5 tams 3-8, a good 2-0 in bowls for a record of 16-25. He got 9 wins against Teams like Akron (2), Maine (2), Colgate, Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane, and Stony Brook. The wins in 2011, against Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane were not dominating performances. Doug helped bring the program back from the abyss, but in reality our record in his 4 years was below average. That 16-25 winning percentage is .390, that is where we were after 4 years.Hey Anomander Scott Shafer won more games for Doug than Doug did for Doug while he was here. The SU defense was far superior to the offense except for Marrones last year. Shafer may get turnout to be a better coach. No one knows the future.
To be fair, and despite your enthusiasm, there is little evidence to date that SS will be a good college HC. At the very best, the jury is still out. Fact: he is 10-15 as a HC, with 6 of those 10 wins over the likes of Wagner, Tulane, Nova, CMU, and Wake (2x).
People still don't acknowledge the fact that Doug had a losing Big East record 11-17, in OOC games against P-5 tams 3-8, a good 2-0 in bowls for a record of 16-25. He got 9 wins against Teams like Akron (2), Maine (2), Colgate, Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane, and Stony Brook. The wins in 2011, against Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane were not dominating performances. Doug helped bring the program back from the abyss, but in reality our record in his 4 years was below average. That 16-25 winning percentage is .390, that is where we were after 4 years.
Marrone was under .400 in Big East play so he didn't set the world on fire either. Shafer did very well last year under the circumstances.
Most fans have no earthly idea what they are watching and they condemn coaches who forgot more that they will ever know. Shafer is an excellent defensive mind and I think he will get the HC thing right next next year. He is under severe budget constraints and our program is still on life support. Marrone got us out of intensive care but we are still in therapy. Give the guy a chance.
Marrone is a great football coach.
I like Shafer a lot, but Marrone towers over him as a HC.
Good college coach, just doesn't stack up to Belichick. That's my entire point. I'm kinda peacocking a bit and I apologize since i'm enjoying the hell out of the last 14 years after dealing with years of ineptitude in New England. I don't see Marrone as the guy who will take the Bills to that perpetual 10-12 win state. I'm just stating what I think. Who knows he may surprise and become Chuck Noll.
I wish he never left Syracuse because my expectations of that program are 8 wins year in and year out with the occasional 11 win What season (see 88, 92, etc). He was en route to that. I am a Marrone guy and wish he was still in Syracuse but like i said my expectations for my college team (alma mader) and the Pats are in two different galaxies.
Marrone was under .400 in Big East play so he didn't set the world on fire either. Shafer did very well last year under the circumstances.
Most fans have no earthly idea what they are watching and they condemn coaches who forgot more that they will ever know. Shafer is an excellent defensive mind and I think he will get the HC thing right next next year. He is under severe budget constraints and our program is still on life support. Marrone got us out of intensive care but we are still in therapy. Give the guy a chance.
5 games below .500 isn't a "stat"?You have responded as if I am bashing Shafer. I am not. You made a statement that Marrone and Shafer are BOTH very good coaches. There is evidence to support the statement about Marrone (despite Milhouse's use of "stats"). Marrone is a HC in the freakin NFL and he reportedly had multiple teams pursuing him. And SS is 5 games below .500 in 2 years as a HC. There is very little to support the "good head coach" moniker other than your desire for it to be true. That doesn't mean he will not prove to be a good HC some day. It does mean that he has done nothing yet to inspire that confidence.
It doesn't get too much more basic than that, Crusty.
5 games below .500 isn't a "stat"?
People still don't acknowledge the fact that Doug had a losing Big East record 11-17, in OOC games against P-5 tams 3-8, a good 2-0 in bowls for a record of 16-25. He got 9 wins against Teams like Akron (2), Maine (2), Colgate, Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane, and Stony Brook. The wins in 2011, against Rhode Island, Toledo, Tulane were not dominating performances. Doug helped bring the program back from the abyss, but in reality our record in his 4 years was below average. That 16-25 winning percentage is .390, that is where we were after 4 years.
marrone still had his QB thoughBut hey if Marrone's 2011 season wasn't marred by injuries who knows what would have happened? We were 5-2 with a huge win over WVU before injuries mounted up and decimated an already thin team that was just in the process of being rebuilt. I mean if Shafer is getting a pass for this year, then it's only fair to credit Marrone for a season that was actually looking good before injuries took over. If anything Marrone had a far better excuse for the season spiraling out of control then Shafer did, but i'm not even trying to get into the injury thing again.
marrone still had his QB though
i guess you use stats acceptably and i don't.
Levy
But hey if Marrone's 2011 season wasn't marred by injuries who knows what would have happened? We were 5-2 with a huge win over WVU before injuries mounted up and decimated an already thin team that was just in the process of being rebuilt. I mean if Shafer is getting a pass for this year, then it's only fair to credit Marrone for a season that was actually looking good before injuries took over. If anything Marrone had a far better excuse for the season spiraling out of control then Shafer did, but i'm not even trying to get into the injury thing again.
hopefully those people have learned. i'm just talking about the coaches' #1 qbsI thought people don't like Hunt? I keep getting confused?
I don't want to be bashing Marrone because I think he is a very good coach. However, that is just my opinion and I can't defend it on the record. The fact he is an NFL coach means nothing for if that were the standard I guess Mark Tressman, Chan Gailey, Rich Kotite and all the others would be considered great coaches.You have responded as if I am bashing Shafer. I am not. You made a statement that Marrone and Shafer are BOTH very good coaches. There is evidence to support the statement about Marrone (despite Milhouse's use of "stats"). Marrone is a HC in the freakin NFL and he reportedly had multiple teams pursuing him. And SS is 5 games below .500 in 2 years as a HC. There is very little to support the "good head coach" moniker other than your desire for it to be true. That doesn't mean he will not prove to be a good HC some day. It does mean that he has done nothing yet to inspire that confidence.
It doesn't get too much more basic than that, Crusty.
yes that levy. very dumb postThe guy who couldn't win a Super Bowl? That Levy? Appearances don't matter.
A very interesting question is whether it is easier to take a really terrible program to average or to take an average program to say, the top 25. Personally, I think it is the former. It seems to me it gets harder and harder to improve the better you get. When you are at the bottom it doesn't take much to improve the talent because the pool of players better than yours is so large. There is a lot of low hanging fruit. As you near the top the talent thins out a lot and the competition for it gets much more intense.
A great number of formerly top programs face this challenge. For some, it used to be easy as they had a great deal of talent in their 600 mile recruiting radius and now that talent is thinned out and the competition for it has increased as well. For some schools the increase in cost has also reduced the huge number of walk-ons to a trickle.
One of the objectives of the P5 is to monopolize the talent pool so as to create an insurmountable product quality gap, which in turn will create pricing power.
Why is it that Marrone has a far better reason? He had a far better QB who was not injured. I just don't get it why injuries explain one coach's season but not another, especially when the injuries were more widespread for one.
Personally, I gave Marrone a pass not only for that season but for the first four games of 2012 as well.
I don't want to be bashing Marrone because I think he is a very good coach. However, that is just my opinion and I can't defend it on the record. The fact he is an NFL coach means nothing for if that were the standard I guess Mark Tressman, Chan Gailey, Rich Kotite and all the others would be considered great coaches.
You have an opinion that I happen to share with respect to Marrone but it is only an opinion that cannot be supported by facts. Time will tell for both Marrone and Shafer.