NateW
Living Legend
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Messages
- 11,363
- Like
- 16,202
He undercut the shooter... it’s a foulNo it’s not. You don’t make that call in that situation. Not enough contact to blow the whistle.
He undercut the shooter... it’s a foulNo it’s not. You don’t make that call in that situation. Not enough contact to blow the whistle.
the same contact happened on the auburn shot yet no call
He undercut the shooter... it’s a foul
It was a very thin call.If that happened to us no one here would be saying it was the right call. It’s not a foul.
Lol the refs missed a double dribble as well.
Auburn got hosed love it.
auburn had 2 chances to not let them shoot 3s and they got both off and it costs them the game
So you base calls on the situation? Even though it was foul the ref should swallow the whistle because of the situation? That doesn't make sense. If the ref sees it he should make the call whether it's .6 seconds into the game or .6 seconds left.No it’s not. You don’t make that call in that situation. Not enough contact to blow the whistle.
Bruce Bowen did it all the time.
Guy did the old Kobe stick out your foot and get a call routine.
yes it was a foul and still i dont think you call it at that point of the game, in hockey it would be a foul and embellishment penalty
Guy’s legs are pretty much together... I don’t see him sticking his leg out at all.It was a very thin call.
If Guy didn’t stick out his foot when he shoots I don’t think he gets the call.
Had the foul already been called before the double dribble?
I am not upset at the call one bit. I just thought it was a thin call. Props to the ref for calling it.Not sure what play you watched but the Auburn player left the floor several feet away from Guy (look at the defender's feet when he left the ground and compare where he lands) and bumped into Guy. No funky kick out the foot so you get hit.