JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,946
- Like
- 54,718
Apparently this was the graffiti directed at the Asians. I think I saw stuff 10x worse than this in the bathroom stalls in Middle School.
Good lord
Apparently this was the graffiti directed at the Asians. I think I saw stuff 10x worse than this in the bathroom stalls in Middle School.
Jesus, thats probably been there for a decade. Thats at every other nook at UB.
Apparently this was the graffiti directed at the Asians. I think I saw stuff 10x worse than this in the bathroom stalls in Middle School.
Yeah, that's just silly.
Is this true though? Knew it was down when Cantor allowed everyone and their brother in. But thought the profile was rising since then.
Party school matters none. Ivy League schools are just as big party schools. Couldn’t mean less in my eyes.
this is going to look awful on national tv...oh wait.
. . .
As for the graffiti itself (second hand info) - the N word appeared several times, along with slurs against Asians and several minority student's names called out specifically. Pretty ugly stuff. Perhaps some of this is a result of declining academic standing and rising "party school" status. I know Kent hates that label, but what is the school doing to change the profile of admitted/incoming students?
Thank you for saying this and adding your prospective.So, a few observations from my end, as a graduate student at SU whose main area of focus is race, and racism on college campuses.
First, this is not an isolated incident at SU. All PWIs (Predominantly White Institutions) struggle with issues of race and racism. That is in part because we live in a racist society, but it's also because students often don't have much of a semblance of cultural/racial literacy and competency before they come to college. A prime example of this is when I hear white students use the phrase "colored people" EVERY semester I teach a class at SU. This has happened EVERY. SINGLE. SEMESTER for over five years straight. I've also heard it at other schools too. Whether or not the intent is to harm when that phrase is uttered by an unaware student, the larger lack of awareness remains.
Secondly, SU is absolutely a hostile place for students of color. Point blank. Full stop. How many examples do you need? The "blackface halloween" incident in the early 00's. How about "Over the Hill" student TV programming a few years later? Or the Theta Tau incident last year? Or the Ackerman assault last spring, which the administration tried to downplay and said wasn't racially motivated. Or, if you'd like something more common and everyplace, how about the numerous times I've heard white students in the SU basketball section next to me, while we're watching games at the Dome refer to our black basketball players as "monkeys" and "n****rs". Students of color are routinely harassed at SU, their experiences often invalidated by faculty. I know this because I've worked with many students of color on campus at SU through different programs, and I've also seen it happen.
Lastly, the big issue here is that structurally, SU isn't working hard enough to put their money where their mouth is in regards to equity and inclusion. You swell the student body with international students and enjoy their 100% tuition (international students are not eligible for any form of public financial aid assistance) and the opportunity to tout your "diversity numbers" but they're not supported once they get here. Many programs designed to attract, support, and mentor students of color have either been cut completely, or grossly scaled back. (Paris Noir, POSSE, CSTEP, etc). The SEM 100 class that was instituted as a requirement for all incoming first-year students in the wake of the Theta Tau incident is an absolute joke, with little to no discussion about important racial or social issues. This most recent example of the administration telling students to keep this incident "quiet" so that other students would not get upset is abhorrent.
Having working with many students of color over the last few years at SU, I'm noticing that this generation's group of students are far more in tune with and more likely to advocate for social issues that affect them directly. They're also more likely to demand more from the institution in terms of equity and inclusion, and to voice their displeasure when those feelings and changes aren't met with support and structural change.
This is absolutely a "moment" happening at SU right now, and I wish more people were able to understand both how deep these issues of race, racism and inclusion run on this campus, and why our students are rightfully so upset how their "SU experience" is impacted as a result.
Thank you for saying this and adding your prospective.
To add to it, I think student activity is also a recognition of the rise of white nationalism on other campuses and standing up to it. This isn't happening in a bubble.
So, a few observations from my end, as a graduate student at SU whose main area of focus is race, and racism on college campuses.
First, this is not an isolated incident at SU. All PWIs (Predominantly White Institutions) struggle with issues of race and racism. That is in part because we live in a racist society, but it's also because students often don't have much of a semblance of cultural/racial literacy and competency before they come to college. A prime example of this is when I hear white students use the phrase "colored people" EVERY semester I teach a class at SU. This has happened EVERY. SINGLE. SEMESTER for over five years straight. I've also heard it at other schools too. Whether or not the intent is to harm when that phrase is uttered by an unaware student, the larger lack of awareness remains.
Secondly, SU is absolutely a hostile place for students of color. Point blank. Full stop. How many examples do you need? The "blackface halloween" incident in the early 00's. How about "Over the Hill" student TV programming a few years later? Or the Theta Tau incident last year? Or the Ackerman assault last spring, which the administration tried to downplay and said wasn't racially motivated. Or, if you'd like something more common and everyplace, how about the numerous times I've heard white students in the SU basketball section next to me, while we're watching games at the Dome refer to our black basketball players as "monkeys" and "n****rs". Students of color are routinely harassed at SU, their experiences often invalidated by faculty. I know this because I've worked with many students of color on campus at SU through different programs, and I've also seen it happen.
Lastly, the big issue here is that structurally, SU isn't working hard enough to put their money where their mouth is in regards to equity and inclusion. You swell the student body with international students and enjoy their 100% tuition (international students are not eligible for any form of public financial aid assistance) and the opportunity to tout your "diversity numbers" but they're not supported once they get here. Many programs designed to attract, support, and mentor students of color have either been cut completely, or grossly scaled back. (Paris Noir, POSSE, CSTEP, etc). The SEM 100 class that was instituted as a requirement for all incoming first-year students in the wake of the Theta Tau incident is an absolute joke, with little to no discussion about important racial or social issues. This most recent example of the administration telling students to keep this incident "quiet" so that other students would not get upset is abhorrent.
Having working with many students of color over the last few years at SU, I'm noticing that this generation's group of students are far more in tune with and more likely to advocate for social issues that affect them directly. They're also more likely to demand more from the institution in terms of equity and inclusion, and to voice their displeasure when those feelings and changes aren't met with support and structural change.
This is absolutely a "moment" happening at SU right now, and I wish more people were able to understand both how deep these issues of race, racism and inclusion run on this campus, and why our students are rightfully so upset how their "SU experience" is impacted as a result.
Could it be some of us just think there’s better ways of handling this than harassing prospective students and protesting support for the basketball team.Really appreciate the perspective that you provided here. There are too many people posting in this thread with absolutely no clue about the climate on campus or what has been going on there for a while and just want to say "toughen up crybabies." The H0T Takes by some in here have been ridiculous.
Really appreciate the perspective that you provided here. There are too many people posting in this thread with absolutely no clue about the climate on campus or what has been going on there for a while and just want to say "toughen up crybabies." The H0T Takes by some in here have been ridiculous.
Could it be some of us just think there’s better ways of handling this than harassing prospective students and protesting support for the basketball team.
One can support the right of people to protest and also find the way they’re doing it to be obnoxious.
I’m sure there’s much more to this than a lot of us realize, but when you have “public safety notices” about an Asian glory hole joke, you risk people not taking you as seriously as they should.
So, a few observations from my end, as a graduate student at SU whose main area of focus is race, and racism on college campuses.
First, this is not an isolated incident at SU. All PWIs (Predominantly White Institutions) struggle with issues of race and racism. That is in part because we live in a racist society, but it's also because students often don't have much of a semblance of cultural/racial literacy and competency before they come to college. A prime example of this is when I hear white students use the phrase "colored people" EVERY semester I teach a class at SU. This has happened EVERY. SINGLE. SEMESTER for over five years straight. I've also heard it at other schools too. Whether or not the intent is to harm when that phrase is uttered by an unaware student, the larger lack of awareness remains.
Secondly, SU is absolutely a hostile place for students of color. Point blank. Full stop. How many examples do you need? The "blackface halloween" incident in the early 00's. How about "Over the Hill" student TV programming a few years later? Or the Theta Tau incident last year? Or the Ackerman assault last spring, which the administration tried to downplay and said wasn't racially motivated. Or, if you'd like something more common and everyplace, how about the numerous times I've heard white students in the SU basketball section next to me, while we're watching games at the Dome refer to our black basketball players as "monkeys" and "n****rs". Students of color are routinely harassed at SU, their experiences often invalidated by faculty. I know this because I've worked with many students of color on campus at SU through different programs, and I've also seen it happen.
Lastly, the big issue here is that structurally, SU isn't working hard enough to put their money where their mouth is in regards to equity and inclusion. You swell the student body with international students and enjoy their 100% tuition (international students are not eligible for any form of public financial aid assistance) and the opportunity to tout your "diversity numbers" but they're not supported once they get here. Many programs designed to attract, support, and mentor students of color have either been cut completely, or grossly scaled back. (Paris Noir, POSSE, CSTEP, etc). The SEM 100 class that was instituted as a requirement for all incoming first-year students in the wake of the Theta Tau incident is an absolute joke, with little to no discussion about important racial or social issues. This most recent example of the administration telling students to keep this incident "quiet" so that other students would not get upset is abhorrent.
Having working with many students of color over the last few years at SU, I'm noticing that this generation's group of students are far more in tune with and more likely to advocate for social issues that affect them directly. They're also more likely to demand more from the institution in terms of equity and inclusion, and to voice their displeasure when those feelings and changes aren't met with support and structural change.
This is absolutely a "moment" happening at SU right now, and I wish more people were able to understand both how deep these issues of race, racism and inclusion run on this campus, and why our students are rightfully so upset how their "SU experience" is impacted as a result.
...
For Boeheim to say that SU isn't a hostile place for student of color didn't surprise me, because really, he has zero interaction with 99% of the student body, outside his basketball team. I'm not going to slay him for saying that, but he really shouldn't be speaking on this and making statements like that when he really doesn't have a perspective and experience that allows him to make such a statement.
Could it be some of us just think there’s better ways of handling this than harassing prospective students and protesting support for the basketball team.
One can support the right of people to protest and also find the way they’re doing it to be obnoxious.
I’m sure there’s much more to this than a lot of us realize, but when you have “public safety notices” about an Asian glory hole joke, you risk people not taking you as seriously as they should.
Yeah, working with African American student-athletes his entire working career and being on campus since the 60’s surely spits out a man who has no relevant experience to draw from.No problem. I am by no means an expert, but more connected to this stuff than most. I wanted to let the flames settle a little bit before weighing in, but yes, most don't have an idea of what's happening on campus unless you're there "in it." The "toughen up" rhetoric or the "ohhh, it's not that bad, it's just words" is really misguided and archaic, IMO.
(See above)...^^^^.
For Boeheim to say that SU isn't a hostile place for student of color didn't surprise me, because really, he has zero interaction with 99% of the student body, outside his basketball team. I'm not going to slay him for saying that, but he really shouldn't be speaking on this and making statements like that when he really doesn't have a perspective and experience that allows him to make such a statement.
Just stop, man. Quit while you're ahead. When the changing nature of U.S. higher ed and our global economy means that many more international students from mainland China and other Asian countries are coming to U.S. colleges and universities, almost all of them as full-pay students, and are subjected to what you call a "joke", it's a big deal.
You're really out of touch with the times.
Moe Neal took part in the protest as well.At least one basketball players seems to appreciate it.
this is where I’m at with this story.I guess I just don't understand what students and maybe yourself expect SU to do in these kind of situations. Taking this specific one for example, wouldn't be in the best interest to immediately have this painted over and to review for any information someone has about a culprit? By making a school wide announcement and it goign on twitter 99% more of the asian student population will see it versus it just being cleaned up as soon as it was discovered. As for Asian students being subjected to something like this I don't know in what world its possible to avoid any group be they black, white, native american, jewish, asian, etc etc from getting exposed to some sort of nonsense like this. I mean its literally impossible.
Is Ackerman considered university jurisdiction or city fo Syracuse?
i thought this was all because of some graffiti
Does the University even hold jurisdiction over that area? There’s not much they can do if it’s outside of the university, they certainly don’t actively push students to live off campus. I didn’t go to SU so I’m not exactly sure whats on or off campus.The ackerman thing was I believe a 15 year old female who wasnot associated in anyway with SU. I understand there was an issue with how it was handled by police that was the big uproar.
Does the University even hold jurisdiction over that area? There’s not much they can do if it’s outside of the university, they certainly don’t actively push students to live off campus. I didn’t go to SU so I’m not exactly sure whats on or off campus.
Yeah, working with African American student-athletes his entire working career and being on campus since the 60’s surely spits out a man who has no relevant experience to draw from.