Those in the know have posted that we won’t hear about our QB commits until next week. I hate the wait too, I get itWhat the Dickens is going on with this guy? Is he going to commit? We need some QBs bad
What the Dickens is going on with this guy? Is he going to commit? We need some QBs bad
hang on let me use my crystal ball.What the Dickens is going on with this guy? Is he going to commit? We need some QBs bad
Ooohh CL with the David Carradine Kung Fu gif. Nice. Remember watching that on Sunday nights with the family way...way back in the day.
Which is why I preferred Odom and atkinson.He seems to loft the ball quite a bit and throw lollipops which works when you have wide open WRs but won’t work when you’re playing ACC defenses. I think I’d rather have Atkinson if we are adding another
Trajectory might be result of stature to get the ball over the line and defenders. It's unique but effective and he drops absolute dimes and throws an extremely catchable ball. Would do well throwing to the Monstars we've got at WR and us an extremely viable option if Steve isn't fully recovered. He'd have a chance to start regardless and could be guaranteed starter fair amount of other places.He seems to loft the ball quite a bit and throw lollipops which works when you have wide open WRs but won’t work when you’re playing ACC defenses. I think I’d rather have Atkinson if we are adding another
These defenses clearly aren’t very good. I’m not convinced at all that it would work p4 levelTrajectory might be result of stature to get the ball over the line and defenders. It's unique but effective and he drops absolute dimes and throws an extremely catchable ball. Would do well throwing to the Monstars we've got at WR and us an extremely viable option if Steve isn't fully recovered. He'd have a chance to start regardless and could be guaranteed starter fair amount of other places.
He seems to loft the ball quite a bit and throw lollipops which works when you have wide open WRs but won’t work when you’re playing ACC defenses. I think I’d rather have Atkinson if we are adding another
If the defenses suck which I believe they do, then whether it’s a ball with zip or a lollipop won’t matter. What I’m saying is I don’t think his throw will translate when facing tougher defenses. I haven’t watched much film on Atkinson but if he throws more of a line drive then I’d prefer thatThat's a lot of production from someone throwing "lollipops." Atkinson played in the same league and did not have this type of production.
- FCS All-American and the Southern Conference Offensive Player of the Year
- The most accurate passer in the FCS in 2025 (74 % CP, 7.7 % off-target rate)
- Set an NCAA record by completing his first 46 passes against Wolford
- 39 TDs, 3 turnovers
- Averaged 9.6 yards per attempt - 4th best in the FCS.
- 624 passing yds, 6 TDs against Samford; 560 passing, 7 TDs against Mercer
But, I would be thrilled if we could add either Dickens or Atkinson to Odom.
Time will tell... and may not even be here but 39 td's vs 2 int's is impressive. Dickens sees the feild well and executes plays and would also be net positive to have with the South Florida WRs.These defenses clearly aren’t very good. I’m not convinced at all that it would work p4 level
One would think so. It’d be a big win. Have not heard squat though.So with Atkinson to Oregon St., are our chips in the middle here?
Discovered this article searching the ‘net for info on Dickens.So with Atkinson to Oregon St., are our chips in the middle here?
Hard to compare the two with the talent gap in their competition, but I agree.Like him better than Odom.
I think 38 TD to 2 Int's is pretty special on any level. He also broke a record completing 49 passes in a row. I saw Odom had 4 Turnovers in their Bowl game, which made me a little queasy.Hard to compare the two with the talent gap in their competition, but I agree.