RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 31,082
- Like
- 101,422
While I agree with your premise (which is why I mentioned Cam Jonas who is a example of what you spell out) i think you missed my whole entire point. Once again it doesnt look like we are building ANY and definitely not experienced quality depth in the trenches. Just look at the backup DT and interior O-line.
But let me say once again how much I like Hanna. I think I have positively mentioned him as the type of recruit QE SHOULD be getting.
I'm not sure how you build "experienced" depth from high school recruiting. Experienced depth comes from players already in the program -- and if your contention is that we aren't building quality depth in the trenches on either side of the ball, I don't agree and view that as knee jerk. As part of this rebuild, Dino and staff have not just turned over the roster swiftly, they've improved the size, speed, and athleticism of just about every positional unit -- INCLUDING OL and DL. That doesn't mean that we've arrived, or that we're landing elite prospects [Alton Robinson aside], but the talent / depth issue has been improved, and continues to improve each year.
We'll know where things stand on OL if the likes of the Davis pair, White, Fromy, Vetterelo, and the JUCO OT [Tisdale] all are capable of playing meaningful snaps. If they are, then the depth at OL is solid, we'll field a full two-deep, and we'll be positioned well to handle off-season attrition after this year.
We also just landed an OG last week for the class of 2020.
Need to continue to add pieces at DT. But we landed several guys last year who are coming in as ends that the coaching staff intends to grow into interior D-linemen, a la Chris Slayton or McKinley Williams. Namely, Munoz, Dawson, and Tuazma. Rondi is already DT sized. That appears to be our template -- recruit tall, athletic guys with room to add size and morph them into athletic DTs with wheels.
The class of 2019 helped load up the pipeline with solid, young talent at DL. Need to do the same thing again this year, to keep the pipeline filled --as it will be a process with some of these guys to "grow" into DT. But the situation isn't as dire as you are making it out to be -- by a longshot.
We're not a selector school, so we need to add quality prospects on both lines every year and give them time to develop. We've already begun to see the long-term benefit of that process pay off. Need another class of DL like last year's and we'll be fine -- and we have 12 open scholarships [minimum, as there's always unanticipated attrition at the end of the year] and six more months to do it.
Last edited: