pearl31
in cahoots
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2011
- Messages
- 15,075
- Like
- 36,195
the (laughable) narrative that the assistants got to decide who to prioritize and who to offer?Don’t mess with the narrative.
Last edited:
the (laughable) narrative that the assistants got to decide who to prioritize and who to offer?Don’t mess with the narrative.
Wasn’t Taylor a JB recruit? I think JB pitched Taylor heavily on becoming Buddy 2.0the narrative that the assistants got to decide who to prioritize and who to offer?
CorrectWasn’t Taylor a JB recruit? I think JB pitched Taylor heavily on becoming Buddy 2.0
he doesn't take many. it feels like he is shooting so poorly because they are all open looks. Like a defender is not even covering him type looks.
I think Red has had a fine year for the hand he was dealt. I’ll be more critical next year, but he has to hit the offseason running. The referendums after each game have become exhausting.
I’m separating JB from Red which appears to be a difficult thing to do for half the board. We are trending in the right direction despite the hyper emotional posts whenever we lose.I have taken a wait and see approach relative to this season and haven't made any judgements, etc. being fully aware as a first time head coach there would be ups and downs, etc.
I am generally curious about the "hand he was dealt" remark you've made as well as some others. This hand he was dealt, as an assistant head coach here for years leading up to this year, didn't he play a good part in recruiting/bringing this roster to SU? I mean, I've read here on numerous occasions in the past/last several years that Red and Gerry did all/most of the recruiting as JB really had no interest in doing the work, etc. and resting on his laurels so to speak.
Therefore, it would appear then that Red certainly does have a "hand" in this roster's make up, etc. Not to mention, the additional folks he brought in (fully aware of their injury status, hopeful recoveries, etc.) during the off season. I understand the Jesse situation threw a significant monkey wrench into the 5 spot, however, I think some folks here overrated his productivity somewhat, especially when he went up against some of the more beefy, stronger type compettion faced against those particular league teams/match-ups, etc.
the (laughable) narrative that the assistants got to decide who to prioritize and who to offer?
I’m separating JB from Red which appears to be a difficult thing to do for half the board to do. We are trending in the right direction despite the hyper emotional posts whenever we lose.
If you want to criticize Red I think the one area you can go after him for is giving Benny too many chances, but then again half this board thought he would be a productive player with JB gone because JB was too tough on him.
The recruiting situation has been discussed at length. Red and Gerry would go see kids while JB sat home. Calipari, Larranaga and others were doing the recruiting as HC’s while our assistants were doing all the heavy lifting. It’s easy to see why a kid would not want to come here if the HC can’t be bothered to get in the car or on a plane to see him. That doesn’t even take into account the fact JB didn’t want them going after certain guys for a multitude of other reasons.
I suppose Red could have taken a butcher knife to the entire roster in the offseason like Pitino and Cooley did, but as we have seen it’s not easy to build a winner that way either.
This is easily proven not true.
last year - 39 percent from 3
this year - 30 percent from 3, basically same amount of makes with 20 more shots. If he shoots 39 percent this year, I would guess we win 2-3 more games
Honestly thinking about it more. Maybe 4-5 games. If he was hitting 39 percent, the offense would be much more open for Judah and JJ to slash and drive. plus he rebounds better than Bell, so we could sit Chris when he wasn’t hitting. Really hurt this season a lot
No. The narrative that if the toilet doesn’t flush properly, it’s Boeheims fault. Silly boy.the (laughable) narrative that the assistants got to decide who to prioritize and who to offer?
I am generally curious about the "hand he was dealt" remark you've made as well as some others. This hand he was dealt, as an assistant head coach here for years leading up to this year, didn't he play a good part in recruiting/bringing this roster to SU? I mean, I've read here on numerous occasions in the past/last several years that Red and Gerry did all/most of the recruiting as JB really had no interest in doing the work, etc. and volutarily resting on his laurels so to speak.
Well if JB sat back and did nothing his last few years, who went out and watched the players and recruited them. People can't have it both ways. If he was so detached, how did he even know who to recruit?
My guess is that fault lies with the whole former coaching staff.
JW’s slow playing of Dino’s firing suggests he’ll get a 3rd year (at least), but imo I’d need to see a LOT of potential to provide a 3rd year if next year’s team is similarly under-whelming. And what if Freeman is OAD?
The same points keep coming up in every discussion about Red, so I'll give the same response. Just because the assistants were doing most of the recruiting work, doesn't mean they had carte blanche to go recruit players that didn't fit into Boeheim's system. So they were looking for tall lanky guards (rules out a lot of PG, which is why we often end up with combo guards running point) and forwards with good wingspan.
If we had a smoother transition, with an announcement maybe a year in advance, then the point that the current crop of recruits were on Red would have a lot more merit.
You really don't have a clue how JB ran things, do you?No. The narrative that if the toilet doesn’t flush properly, it’s Boeheims fault. Silly boy.
Played a role, sort of, but it's all relative. You have to judge them based on the situation they were put in - recruiting to JB's system with the head coach only acting as a closer, with recruits knowing the head coach was old and could retire any time.I'm not arguing from an absolute sense that the "current crop of recruits" are on Red, simply suggesting that he played a role, therefore, contributing to the "hand he was dealt" thesis. I think it's pretty darn convenient to say otherwise, but as with any argument, folks will chose to align their opinion/beliefs with their particular point of view, etc.
I guess some of these same folks whom are able to disassociate Red from JB now, likely tied the two (Gerry as well) to JB moreso during the 2016 Final Four run, etc. when it was more convenient to be linked directly to "Boeheim's system."
Relax - sophomore team that has lost most of its bigs. 1st year coach changing up the defense and offense. It’s a more athletic team with some big weaknesses.Barring a miracle in the next 3 weeks, Red’s season 1 is looking like a bust, or at least underperformed against fans’ expectations.
Looking ahead to next year I believe he must make the NCAA Tournament. The program can’t continue to produce mediocre results year after year. We’re slipping as a national program. Falling with the likes of Indiana and Georgetown into the oblivion of has-beens.
Question is, do you give Red a third year if he fails to make the NCAAT next year?
Even if he gets a third year, if he doesn’t make the tournament by his third year there’s no chance he gets a 4th.
Good post (per usual).The same points keep coming up in every discussion about Red, so I'll give the same response. Just because the assistants were doing most of the recruiting work, doesn't mean they had carte blanche to go recruit players that didn't fit into Boeheim's system. So they were looking for tall lanky guards (rules out a lot of PG, which is why we often end up with combo guards running point) and forwards with good wingspan.
If we had a smoother transition, with an announcement maybe a year in advance, then the point that the current crop of recruits were on Red would have a lot more merit.
I disagree with this take. Our defense is fine despite the recent skid. The offense has been abysmal and the reason we lose games. Man vs Zone debate shouldn’t impact our ability to run sets on offense. We are an above average defense and below average team on offense. We need scorers.Athletes that JB recruited for zone are not great man to man players. JB wanted size and length. Good man defense needs some physicality, great lateral quickness and toughness. This years team has very little of any of these things.
apparently there are ppl that actually think "lead recruiter" under JB meant they chose which players to go after
lol
There were players that could have helped us that we didn’t bring in that JB said no to. A guard transfer from Auburn who’s name escapes me as one.FWIW, it's not my thinking.
What is, is this. Say, for argument sake as 007 suggests, that Red (and Gerry) had these A list type guys (highly top rated types), but because of what 007 mentioned, JB says ain't ever happening, so bring me your best of the B type, along with your C type, and I'll (we'll) simply coach them up to fit my system.
So, Red brings in those guys per JB's mandate, however, with the understanding that JB at least entrusts Red, his associate head coach (along with Gerry) to still be able to assess, let's just say, "good enough" talent to work and play at the level that is expected at Syracuse University. JB, "having the final say" buys in to this personnel that his assistants and supposedly qualified talent evaluators bring/pitch to him.
If these particular folks don't pan out, or were, let's just say, misevaluated, etc., isn't there at least some degree of onus on Red or Gerry for bring them to JB in the first place as the nuts and bolts guys? That's all I've been attempting to argue.