longislandcuse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 36,003
- Like
- 43,299
I wish we would stop scheduling Liberty so some of you would shut up about it. Do y’all punch the cow mascot when you walk into Chick-Fil-A? Chill out...
Only if their science instruction is based on "intelligent design".Wondering if you’re as skeptical about a science degree from BYU, ND, BC and other Catholic/Christian schools?
I disagree with the 99.9% #, but what player in their right mind wants to lose 3 games? I can't disagree with that. If its X # of players, does the whole team lose 3 games? Thats a big deal, and I can't imagine any player- who say, is asymptotic, and negative in a week, wants to lose 3 games... Or negative players want to lose 1/4 of their season. IF that is the policy? Then I don't see his latter point as a sweeping generalization.
A prediction--Who do we have to blame for Liberty being on our schedule but ourselves. Not only did we sign a multi game deal, but gave them home games. Tell me again how lucky we are to have this AD, maybe if we keep saying it, it will become true...
The NFL prospective first-rounder at Miami, Rousseau, has opted out. His mother is a nurse who has been working with COVID patients. Something to think about.The sweeping generalizations were that no players want to do a spring season. Well, FCS programs are considering a full spring schedule. And while I certainly agree that no player "wants" to lose 3 games, that gives more credence to the prospect of a delayed season -- where the COVID-19 pandemic might be more under control and / or a vaccine might be available -- avoiding those outcomes.
The other sweeping generalization was that this is just about better testing. I'm not suggesting that this isn't a big desire, but there are lots of players opting out -- more than just NFL prospects. 100s of players in the Pac-12 might sit, we have lots of players from various teams [including Dawson from our team] who just don't want to take the risk, irrespective of testing / current state safety protocols.
This is a much more dynamic situation.
The NFL prospective first-rounder at Miami, Rousseau, has opted out. His mother is a nurse who has been working with COVID patients. Something to think about.
Missed those. That makes sense.The sweeping generalizations were that no players want to do a spring season. Well, FCS programs are considering a full spring schedule. And while I certainly agree that no player "wants" to lose 3 games, that gives more credence to the prospect of a delayed season -- where the COVID-19 pandemic might be more under control and / or a vaccine might be available -- avoiding those outcomes.
The other sweeping generalization was that this is just about better testing. I'm not suggesting that this isn't a big desire, but there are lots of players opting out -- more than just NFL prospects. 100s of players in the Pac-12 might sit, we have lots of players from various teams [including Dawson from our team] who just don't want to take the risk, irrespective of testing / current state safety protocols.
This is a much more dynamic situation, with a lot more complexity, than the way the poster I was responding to was presenting it to be.
OF COURSE under normal circumstances, everyone -- fans, coaches, players -- would prefer a "normal" fall schedule. But things aren't normal right now. Football at all levels is in jeopardy, and no matter what everyone might prefer, the best option might be to defer / postpone / delay, rather than have cycles of fits and starts, initiating a season only to have outbreaks that force teams to drop out, forfeit, etc. That seems to be where things are headed -- so maybe pushing things back is the "best" outcome, to ensure the safety of the players and the integrity of an actual season.
My point--which I apparently didn't convey very well--is that Rousseau should be more informed/educated about COVID because of his mother, and that knowledge has led to his decision to opt out.What do you mean, "to think about?" It makes perfect sense -- because Rousseau is universally projected to be a first round draft pick in the 2021 draft. But his use case is far from the only one and far from typical -- 99.9% of players across all levels won't be NFL draft picks.
Them risking exposure which could have direct health consequences -- or indirect consequences for family members who might be in higher risk categories -- might preclude them participating in a contact sport, with a bunch of players who will be living in a petrie dish environment on a college campus, that will be impossible to control unlike the various bubbles in professional sports.
Finkle is Einhorn. Einhorn is Finkle.They don't owe you an explanation. I'm sure that Ian McCaw is in contact with the ADs office. Falwell is not McCaw. McCaw is not Falwell.
Many on this forum have LDS. Liberty derangement syndrome. I was at the game last fall and the people there were very welcoming.Not that any of you care, but the turn in this thread is why I don't come here near as often as I used to. Some of you just have to push politics into everything, particularly those of you that are left of center. A stab at Trump in a thread about Syracuse players opting not to practice? Are you kidding me? We have Off-topic for that BS.
Very reasonable and sensible actions from the players
In theory, he should be significantly safer since that is over a year from now and he won't have to be on a college campus.My point--which I apparently didn't convey very well--is that Rousseau should be more informed/educated about COVID because of his mother, and that knowledge has led to his decision to opt out.
That, and he's a 1st round pick.
Although, I don't know how much safer he will be playing in the NFL vis-a-vis the NCAA.
Theories are nice.In theory, he should be significantly safer since that is over a year from now and he won't have to be on a college campus.
Unfortunately, our "management" of covid doesn't compare in any material respect to Germany's - objectively, factually or otherwise. I'm dying for CFB. It's my favorite sport and time of year - but it's just getting more and more unlikely this year. Maybe it can work in the spring?The ACC needs to drop the non-conf game. Stick to 10 and create testing protocols that are sufficient and approved by all member schools.
Not sure how many soccer fans here but the top league in Germany put their 50-page manual online that helped them restart in mid-May with no issues to date.
And do it again next year as well.*I'm not a pro liberty guy by any stretch but at some point people have to get over the fact that SU signed a fball contract with them. Its a football game not an endorsement of Falwell or anyone else over there. Get the W and move on.