I would have ranked Laver first also, but this "expert" has him 4th.My ranking:
1) Laver
2) Djokovic
3) Nadal
4) Federer
5) Sampras
others: Tilden, Hoad, Budge, Borg, P Gonzalez, Emerson...
My ranking:
1) Laver
2) Djokovic
3) Nadal
4) Federer
5) Sampras
others: Rosewall, Tilden, Hoad, Budge, Borg, P Gonzalez, Emerson...
I would have ranked Laver first also, but this "expert" has him 4th.
Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time
Here is his list of top women's. I would have guessed Serena as #1, but then you see his list and you could argue any of the top four could be argued for the top spot (Serena, Steffi, Martina and Margaret Court.
Top 10 Greatest Women's Tennis Players of All Time
My ranking:
1) Laver
2) Djokovic
3) Nadal
4) Federer
5) Sampras
others: Rosewall, Tilden, Hoad, Budge, Borg, P Gonzalez, Emerson...
Weird that I agree completely with both lists.I would have ranked Laver first also, but this "expert" has him 4th.
Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time
Here is his list of top women's. I would have guessed Serena as #1, but then you see his list and you could argue any of the top four could be argued for the top spot (Serena, Steffi, Martina and Margaret Court.
Top 10 Greatest Women's Tennis Players of All Time
I didn't know until very recently that Seles is married to Tom Golisano. He's worth over 4 billion and 32 years older than her. I wonder if she still grunts.If Seles didn't get attacked her legacy would have been Serena-esque.
Its probably clear to most observers by now that Djokovic is the GOAT among the big 3, but if he wins tomorrow it will be silly to argue otherwise.
Concerning the women:I would have ranked Laver first also, but this "expert" has him 4th.
Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time
Here is his list of top women's. I would have guessed Serena as #1, but then you see his list and you could argue any of the top four could be argued for the top spot (Serena, Steffi, Martina and Margaret Court.
Top 10 Greatest Women's Tennis Players of All Time
I think Djokovic is the best all around player. Federer in his prime though was unbeatable on grass and hard courts. Clay was his weakness which will hurt him come the head to head comparison. I think a 25 year old Federer would give current Djokovic a run for his money but the fact that Djokovic has been consistent throughout his whole career probably gives him a slight edge now. Win the US Open and no debate needed anymore.Its probably clear to most observers by now that Djokovic is the GOAT among the big 3, but if he wins tomorrow it will be silly to argue otherwise.
In tennis, your opponent can win the match for you. Less likely to happen in golf.When I was growing up, golf had a "Big Three", (I even recall they co-sponsored a syndicated show by that name where they played matches.).
(1) The Big Three - Palmer, Nicklaus, and Player | Skysports Golf Documentary - YouTube
The US Amateur was still considered a major when Palmer won it in 1954 and Nicklaus won it in 1959 and 1961 and Jack has always considered that he had won 20 majors. Gary won 9 and Arnold 8 by that measure.
Here's tennis with 3 Nicklauses in the same generation.
It brings up the question: is it equally hard to win a major in both sports? I could think of two differences, both involving control of what your opponent does - or the lack of it.
- Tennis is match play. the gold majors are stroke play. In golf, you are competing against the whole field at once, in tennis, one opponent at a time. You don't have to beat anybody but the person in front of you. there may be someone whose style is troublesome for you - but someone else can beat him and then you can beat the somebody else. In golf you can think you have a solid lead but then hear a roar from another part of the course and suddenly you don't - and there was nothing you could have done to prevent that roar.
- There's no defense is golf. Tennis is almost like boxing. you keep throwing punches at the other guy and think "see if you can handle this one". Only it's shot that the other player is going to have a hard time returning. They don't let you chose what shot the other fellow is going to have to make in golf. And you don't get to block his shots, (and it would hurt if you did).
So maybe winning 20 golf majors is more difficult than winning 20 tennis majors.
In tennis, your opponent can win the match for you. Less likely to happen in golf.
As I said, less likely. For clarification, that is different than never.Jean van de Velde says Hi!
Jean van de Velde (golfer) - Wikipedia
As I said, less likely. For clarification, that is different than never.
He could very well be done but I could see him trying to get in shape for one last Wimbledon. That’s the place he’d love to retire at. Hope it works out for him and he can go out like Sampras.Looks like this may be career ending for Fed - makes me wish he was able to get the best of Novak in that epic Wimbledon final in 2019
Federer out for 'many months,' to miss US Open
Roger Federer announced on Instagram that he is going to miss the US Open and be sidelined for what he said will be "many months" because he needs a third right knee surgery.www.espn.com