oldpinepoint
All American
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,033
- Like
- 11,340
No chance with that ice creamSheetz is starting a super-conference with WaWa and 7-11. Stewart’s is going to get screwed.
No chance with that ice creamSheetz is starting a super-conference with WaWa and 7-11. Stewart’s is going to get screwed.
Ten schools from the ACC make sense but why would the SEC want NC State, Wake, VA Tech, GA Tech? Would the ACC snobs accept being with the SEC schools? If the two did merge you have 30 teams. If you add KU and WV as well you can have 32 teams.
Relegation systems just won’t work in the US. Too unpredictable from a financial and planning standpoint.That's just the opposite of what's afoot right now. The whole idea behind Texas and Oklahoma to the SEC is to lock in that league's advantage for as far forward as anyone can see. Them Good Ol' Boys want to etch it in stone.
I love this idea! Then, those schools can divide into distinct divisions of 10-16 teams, maybe call them conferences!What if 108 schools merge and form the Division 1 conference?
Sooooo haven't read the thread but want to congratulate you all on 45 pages in less than a week. Killin' it!
People have been waiting almost 10 years for this. There's like hundreds of different scenarios to be presented, and no shortage of vaguely inside info to be given!Sooooo haven't read the thread but want to congratulate you all on 45 pages in less than a week. Killin' it!
Does anyone wonder what will happen to the basketball tournament? The NCAA makes a lot of money on it, and can't see these greedy people allowing someone else to run it. Could see the power conferences running it and inviting who they want.People have been waiting almost 10 years for this. There's like hundreds of different scenarios to be presented, and no shortage of vaguely inside info to be given!
It is hard to see a way for both to be the same amount of teams. At best you get both to 30 teams.Feel like this is trending towards a Nike and Adidas type situation, but with ESPN and Fox. or maybe more accurately national league and American League in MLB.
They’re both gonna build junior NFL’s, with espn based on the sec and Fox based on the b1g.
They’ll come together for a playoff based on the one they have now, and each walk away with tons of money.
To make this work they’ll need ditch diggers too in football. Think something like 32 teams under each umbrella (in whatever fashion it works out). The big boys will be there, but the medium guys will find a spot too.
People have been waiting almost 10 years for this. There's like hundreds of different scenarios to be presented, and no shortage of vaguely inside info to be given!
That's an argument for SCAR or Kentucky to be the 4th "no" vote. Show solidarity with ATM now and it's likely they'll reciprocate when and if your "little brother" comes calling.Georgia, and Florida would much rather play Clemson than South Carolina, or Kentucky. With the new playoff even losing to Clemson guarantees a spot in the playoffs, as long as no big loses.
Math is hardI tried to introduce this highfalootin' logic early in this thread. It's never well received.
That's an argument for SCAR or Kentucky to be the 4th "no" vote. Show solidarity with ATM now and it's likely they'll reciprocate when and if your "little brother" comes calling.
The Big East died because they let a basketball guy run it. History is repeating itself because the ACC let a basketball guy from North Carolina run the conference all those years.That's an argument for SCAR or Kentucky to be the 4th "no" vote. Show solidarity with ATM now and it's likely they'll reciprocate when and if your "little brother" comes calling.
Oklahoma State president laying ground work for a lawsuit against Oklahoma and Texas.
If legislation demands that players get a percentage of conference revenue, would it completely change the terms and model those contracts were signed on?Again, how does the ACC get picked off with their GOR time period? I don't get how you jump around the damages on that one? I still think the ACC realizes this (and realizes the money disparity) and try and join up with B10 as some sort of a federation. Almost the equivalent of taking a company private. My guess would be the B10 would have to take all the teams. Synergy of a single leadership, one central commissioner may be worth it to all parties if the alternative is some parties will peel off for the SEC.
The reporters are starting to sniff around on the idea of some schools should be paid more. Why wouldn't the big dogs in the B10 feel the same way?