This is why you play Shrader… | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com

This is why you play Shrader…

Theoretically TD’s ability to touch the whole field with his arm should be fire with this run game, yet we havent’ seen a TD offense look like this against P5 level teams in 2 years.
 
We lose this game by double digits with Tommy in
Yeah, don’t think so. He’s been a good runner this year and prob hits on that deep ball in addition to Tucker having a big night.

I think having this discussion is a bit silly too. The staff thought Shrader gave them something and he produced enough for the win.
 
Yeah, don’t think so. He’s been a good runner this year and prob hits on that deep ball in addition to Tucker having a big night.

I think having this discussion is a bit silly too. The staff thought Shrader gave them something and he produced enough for the win.

If coaches thought Tommy gave us a better chance to win he would have played.

We’ve seen enough of Tommy’s decision making as starter to know what he does when things get tight.
 
We lose this game by double digits with Tommy in

Agreed but more to do with Servais than Tommy. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was trying to throw the game.
 
We will need our WRs to win the 1 on 1 battles now. Nobody going to be playing zone against us now. They are going to stack the box and play man defense. Can our WRs win those battles and present GS with easy throws???

Also passing game needs to get a little creative bring back those short option routes that erv philips made famous.
 
6/15 for 77 and he missed a lot of open guys. It’s just not gonna cut it in conference. Flood the box to stop Tucker you win going away.

He’s Rex except he has a running game

TD Can hand it to Tucker 31 times just the same
Except we don't call those plays with TD that we did with GS.

Why is that? No trust in TD
 
Theoretically TD’s ability to touch the whole field with his arm should be fire with this run game, yet we havent’ seen a TD offense look like this against P5 level teams in 2 years.
It doesn't make sense at all. I know there are intangibles missing but even still he should be able to win games. The offense just stalls. I don't know.
 
We will need our WRs to win the 1 on 1 battles now. Nobody going to be playing zone against us now. They are going to stack the box and play man defense. Can our WRs win those battles and present GS with easy throws???

Also passing game needs to get a little creative bring back those short option routes that erv philips made famous.

Play action should be LETHAL in those situations.

I was livid that we didn’t try that once late in the game, especially those 2 straight plays that Tucker got swarmed for negative yards.

WR’s HAD to be running free if that many dudes were run-blitzing.
 
Another point to ponder is that Shrader started game four, HCDB claims it takes 1.5 seasons (18 games) to be ready to run the offense. If Shrader improves weekly as he should, he will be a good QB.
Good thing we didn’t give him the entire Albany game then.
 
Yeah, don’t think so. He’s been a good runner this year and prob hits on that deep ball in addition to Tucker having a big night.

I think having this discussion is a bit silly too. The staff thought Shrader gave them something and he produced enough for the win.
Right, the staff knows that GS is better for their system then TD. Finally!!
 
6/15 for 77 and he missed a lot of open guys. It’s just not gonna cut it in conference. Flood the box to stop Tucker you win going away.

He’s Rex except he has a running game

TD Can hand it to Tucker 31 times just the same
No because some of those times Schrader made the difference. On the 1st TD< they were all running towards Tucker and Schrader ran it. TD can't do that. He can't fool them. That is part of what gives Tucker the openings
 
If coaches thought Tommy gave us a better chance to win he would have played.

We’ve seen enough of Tommy’s decision making as starter to know what he does when things get tight.
I don’t think you read my second paragraph? Lol

Trust me. He’ll play.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
171,797
Messages
4,977,004
Members
6,020
Latest member
OldeOstrom

Online statistics

Members online
202
Guests online
3,051
Total visitors
3,253


...
Top Bottom