Sherman20
2018 Iggy Leading Scorer Winner
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2017
- Messages
- 7,044
- Like
- 17,847
It is not a 100 million per school. It will range between 70-75 million. 8 billion over seven years, 16 schools.100M per school. CRAZY. Players should refuse to play until they get paid.
Yeah. Good deal, but not landscape changing.So at 16 teams this is around 65 mil each year/team at the 7 billion number? They are making around 50 mil right now based on an internet search.
Yeah. Good deal, but not landscape changing.
Not saying it is bad. Just no where near the 100 million per school mark. The ACC should feel better seeing these figures.Me thinks you are underselling this. If i got a 50% raise tomorrow, that would be pretty life changing. I'm sure most of America would agree with me (especially top earners).
I don’t know the numbers myself, but there are several reports out there that the final five years of the seven year contract will net 100 million per team, the starting dollars lessSo at 16 teams this is around 65 mil each year/team at the 7 billion number? They are making around 50 mil right now based on an internet search.
Someone in New Jersey.All that money and someone is still going to come in last.
The trick will be the proud tradition of fleecing the players while finding ways to spend the money in ways that lead to winning. Probably naive if me but I think 100mil vs 75mil doesn’t shift that equation as much as we’re being lead to believeAll that money and someone is still going to come in last.
ND, Stanford, Syracuse, and Pitt/UVA/UNC...(pick 2, drop Rutgers).The logical four extra schools would be Oregon, Stanford, Washington and ND right?
Not sure if true, but apparently Stanford and Cal would never separate.The logical four extra schools would be Oregon, Stanford, Washington and ND right?