0.2 YNdeeR
Starter
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2021
- Messages
- 1,089
- Like
- 3,351
i do believe that the ACC is going to make a play for 4 or more additional teams.What are the odds for Utah?
It will remain in third place. It will continue to make more money and it will end up having teams every year in the playoffs, winning baseball championships, winning Lacrosse championships and of course winning basketball championships. Both women and men.Would not surprise me at all if after the dust settles the ACC remains to be the third most lucrative conference. It's my understanding that it's already #3.
Does the Big 12 have The Longhorn Network remnants?We have the ACCN which is HUGE
It is, and that is why the ACC contract is all the way to 2036.We have the ACCN which is HUGE
No. It is about to be shut down. The B12 will never have its own network.Does the Big 12 have The Longhorn Network remnants?
Not to sound like a di*k, but part of that was said also from the "Conference of Champions" before their demise. "Football, football, football". RIP Tim Russert.It will remain in third place. It will continue to make more money and it will end up having teams every year in the playoffs, winning baseball championships, winning Lacrosse championships and of course winning basketball championships. Both women and men.
I don’t see how it’s possible singularly.How would Utah to the ACC even be possible? It’s too late to bring them in this year and if they play in the B12 they’ll be bound to their GOR. What’s the angle?
They apparently have good lawyers in Utah and the B12 was desperate.I don’t see how it’s possible singularly.
The Pac TV contract expired and they completely mismanaged and blew the negotiations for a new deal. They overplayed their position and in essence killed themselves. The demise of the PAC was 100% self inflicted.Not to sound like a di*k, but part of that was said also from the "Conference of Champions" before their demise. "Football, football, football". RIP Tim Russert.
How would Utah to the ACC even be possible? It’s too late to bring them in this year and if they play in the B12 they’ll be bound to their GOR. What’s the angle?
Why. The Big contract/GOR terms are independent from the ACC GOR.The rumor is that there is a deadline to sign the GOR that has yet to pass. So if Utah announces an ACC move beforehand, they can leave. Not sure how they avoid the exit fee though. Even if they forgo their one year's B12 revenue, it is only half the exit fee. Which then gives FSU ammo to say look others get off for 1/2 the exit fee shouldn't we too?
Why. The Big contract/GOR terms are independent from the ACC GOR.
As much as I want to say freck UConn, yeah, they help downstream with non FB.UConn, WVU please, they need to be part of any expansion if we are getting the band back together.
Way different fact base between FSU/ACC and Utah/Big12.The rumor is that there is a deadline to sign the GOR that has yet to pass. So if Utah announces an ACC move beforehand, they can leave. Not sure how they avoid the exit fee though. Even if they forgo their one year's B12 revenue, it is only half the exit fee. Which then gives FSU ammo to say look others get off for 1/2 the exit fee shouldn't we too?
They dont add valueUConn, WVU please, they need to be part of any expansion if we are getting the band back together.
I’m happy they have a good BB team. So does Gonzaga.They dont add value
Yes, agree 100%. I understand the nostalgia of adding UConn for basketball but football drives the bus and UConn does not help there. Plus, it gives them a platform to compete with us for NE recruits. Hard pass. WVU I could see as they have a decent FB program. Not a big needle mover though.I’m happy they have a good BB team. So does Gonzaga.
Why anyone would want to add another NE football mouth to feed, I’ll never understand.
They apparently have good lawyers in Utah and the B12 was desperate.
The question is, were any of the other B12 additions as smart?
If the ACC expands, I believe it will expand to an even number. It wasn‘t a coincidence it went from 15 to 18 last time around. That odd team makes scheduling for basketball really hard and almost ensures a conference team has a weekend off all through the conference season. That is bad for business. Weekends are when the crowds are biggest and the TV numbers are the highest.
We Syracuse fans know this all too well from last season, when we draw the short straw and had to sit out the last weekend of the season.
If these reports are correct and ESPN is emphasizing TV market size and increased subscribers to ACCN to a bump in revenue, I would think the other school would be from a market the ACC is not in that is a big one.
Probably San Diego State? Colorado if they have the same provision Utah has when they joined the B12. I don’t think they do though.
It all makes sense when you think about it. Utah plays a year in the B12. The ACC adds them and San Diego State in 2025, when the look in with ESPN happens. ESPN gives all ACC schools a nice bump in revenue, making it clearly a better move for Utah than the B12. They get more money and a chance to feature their programs on a conference TV network, Utah is only bound to the ACC until 2036 and might get out earlier in the unlikely event FSU and Clemson find a way to get out of the GOR (or pay their way out).
The move answers the complaints FSU and Clemson have made about the ACC doing nothing to protect their brands or enhancing the conference. Bumps their revenue and adding the best football program in the B12 improves ACC football markedly. Hurts their position in their lawsuits against the ACC.
The ACC finally gets a sixth lacrosse program. And ESPN delivers a major blow to the Fox controlled B12 conference. They protect their investment in the ACC and set the stage for more raids from the B12 circa 2030-31.