It wasn't the right move at the time, and everything else is just rationalized confirmatory bias to pretend that we had limited choices.
In actuality, JB's lack of performance meant that the end should have probably come sooner than it did, and his conduct leading up to the end meant that the AD shouldn't have catered to him anymore. JB deserves everything for the program he built, but also a lion's share of blame for the 8-year extended decline.
Pretending that choices were constrained, or that we had limited options, is what led to this mess.
Which is why I responded the way I did to the post you made above. Of course JW wants the basketball program to be successful. But his actions and choices have not maximized the possibility of that happening. Talking about who bleeds orange, who loves Syracuse Athletics more, is all bunk. This is a performance driven profession, and making wishy-washy decisions based on feelings and unimportant evaluative criteria is the wrong approach.
As we have definitively seen over the last year and a half.