Yes and got paid a years salary and is a year closer to his second contract.
What an idiot he is.
And yet somehow that wouldn't have been the case if he had the same injury in an NIT game?
Yes and got paid a years salary and is a year closer to his second contract.
What an idiot he is.
I am not necessarily saying which side I'm on bc i get both.
But the reason why athletes aren't playing in bowl game is bc they don't want to get hurt before going to the next level.
What if there was a clause in the scholarship that if a team qualifies for a bowl game and a athlete doesn't play for any reason (other than suspension, injury or personal ie. bereavement) that the the scholarship would need to be paid back by the athlete?
Some coaches don't coach in their bowl games. Why should the player get punished?
a bit of quick googling shows that Clowney did play in the Capital One Bowl on 1/1/14 (had 5 tackles).Didn't Clowney do that, too? I thought he started the whole trend.
This is ridiculous, and would be quickly dismissed as the ridiculous idea it is.I am not necessarily saying which side I'm on bc i get both.
But the reason why athletes aren't playing in bowl game is bc they don't want to get hurt before going to the next level.
What if there was a clause in the scholarship that if a team qualifies for a bowl game and a athlete doesn't play for any reason (other than suspension, injury or personal ie. bereavement) that the the scholarship would need to be paid back by the athlete?
Usually a buy out has occurred for this to happen.
And yet somehow that wouldn't have been the case if he had the same injury in an NIT game?
Fournette and McCaffrey seem to have no issues with their teammates.
Maybe the colleges are getting too much money, pushing them further from their designated purpose.A scholarship is a wonderful thing for so many college athletes. In many cases you can't even measure how valuable it really is.
ESPN is paying "about 600 million dollars" annually to air the CFP. 3 games.
ESPN is "charging advertisers as much as $1 million for just a single 30-second spot"
Maybe a scholarship isn't enough.
You don't seem to get the point. It doesn't matter.
People are talking about how skipping a bowl will hurt people's status and/or how they will move to the next level. Fact: it doesn't.
This is a fact. We've have multiple examples.
This is now going on multiple years of this same thread.
I understand people don't like that the weed eater bowl has lost its luster. Is what it is.
Notice that no one is answering this one.
We have specific cases yet we still have posts dealing with hypotheticals.
Maybe the colleges are getting too much money, pushing them further from their designated purpose.
Schools will do anything to spend the money on everything except giving it to the actual players
Good. We never achieve changing the system for the better if we start paying players.
Re Simmons he got hurt in practice. He's a basketball player. Stop for a second and think how dumb it is that somebody would not play in a basketball game cuz he's afraid to get hurt.
Absolutely easier. But not better.Would be much easier to pay the players then reverse the current state of college athletics
[citation needed]How would we know one way or the other? Fournette had a major rap at LSU for being a guy completely focused on his pro career while being vaguely interested in helping LSU win football games.
Some coaches don't coach in their bowl games. Why should the player get punished?
What is so horrible about the idea of people getting paid for making a billion dollar industry function?Good. We never achieve changing the system for the better if we start paying players.
Seems punitive. Why would it be appropriate to penalize athletes for protecting their future earnings stream. That'd be like penalizing a student for not walking on graduation day.I am not necessarily saying which side I'm on bc i get both.
But the reason why athletes aren't playing in bowl game is bc they don't want to get hurt before going to the next level.
What if there was a clause in the scholarship that if a team qualifies for a bowl game and a athlete doesn't play for any reason (other than suspension, injury or personal ie. bereavement) that the the scholarship would need to be paid back by the athlete?
What is so horrible about the idea of people getting paid for making a billion dollar industry function?
For better or worse, that ship has sailed. At least for football and basketball, the NCAA is a highly profitable hybrid between minor league sports and the European soccer academy system.College academics shouldn’t be a billion dollar sports enterprise. That’s not their industry. Their industry, their charter, is education.
Disagree, and we continue to perpetuate an injustice on the socioeconomical disadvantaged by feeding the current system. It’s not too late to do the right thing. But I’m afraid if we start paying players we’ll never get it turned around.For better or worse, that ship has sailed. At least for football and basketball, the NCAA is a highly profitable hybrid between minor league sports and the European soccer academy system.