JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 46,307
- Like
- 66,958
5 minutes from now:
BC upsets Wake.
"Why did the ACC vote for expansion again?"
BC will blow it...
5 minutes from now:
BC upsets Wake.
"Why did the ACC vote for expansion again?"
I think the bad PR necessitated the apology. Damage control.Spit-balling: The apology was requested by the ACC and will allow Buddy to play tomorrow (and hopefully beyond). That said, what they should do is fine Buddy and tap into some of his NIL cash.
The punch reminded me a little of the hit Private Joker takes from Gunny Hartman in FMJ. Nice little pop right in the solar plexus. Definitely can take the wind out of your sails for a minute.
Was he smiling when he did it? I may have heard a time or two this year from a commentator that Buddy is always smiling and happy.Buddy got away with a punch to the gut of an FSU player
I know who would be hiding jelly donuts in their footlocker, but those jokes are off limitsWe owe the ACC for one jelly donut.
He pushed off with his arm. That is a o foul 100% of the time.Flop by BC if you ask me. If any1 is watching
I've been around boxing for many years. At 74 I still work the heavy bag. Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano had 6-inch knock-out punches. Their 6 inch punches to the solar plexus crippled in pain many opponents. Buddy's 6-inch weak punch, even though should not have been thrown, did not cripple that player. It was a belly-flop in acting.The punch reminded me a little of the hit Private Joker takes from Gunny Hartman in FMJ. Nice little pop right in the solar plexus. Definitely can take the wind out of your sails for a minute.
Looked like guy went down in front of him first then arm went out. But, wilke’s shove was worse than buddy’s retaliation to meHe pushed off with his arm. That is a o foul 100% of the time.

Intent.explain the difference of a rabbit punch and a kid boxing out who tosses an elbow or hits a guy in the back with forearm to clear space and that happens 20 times a game.
Fine him $10k and move on.I hope that the clearing of the air between the players after the game factors into any decision [if there is one] the conference makes.
And I'd also hope that Buddy's squeaky clean history also factors in. That play was very, very unusual for a happy go lucky kid like he is. Kind of at a loss to understand what prompted him to do that.
But I'd be surprised to see him get off scot free. Suspended for a half?
He's a poor college kid.Fine him $10k and move on.
All Press is good Press, right?“Boeheim appears to strike Wilkes” is on ESPN’s bottomline. U kidding me?
How does someone not coach him up before the presser so he doesnt make an a$$ out of himselfIt chafes me, though, that JAB said it was "inadvertent." Did he walk that back yet? That's bad. Stupid. It's like, JAB: "Who you gonna believe? Me, or your own lyin' eyes?"
What might help Buddy's cause is that the refs didn't call a foul, a technical nor an ejection on Buddy. However, in the rule book it does say that the conference can look at a suspension afterwards for a fight. Flagrant 2 is mentioned 163 times in the rule book, trip is mentioned 4 times, suspension is mentioned eight times but punch isn't mentioned at all. The definition of a flagrant 2 is on page 48.
Page 106: The following apply to situations in which a fight has been reported by an official during his jurisdiction. When a fight is not reported by an official, the conference or assigning authority may invoke its own penalty. For the rules on suspensions for fighting. (See Rule 10-5)
Page 48: 2. Flagrant 2 personal foul. A flagrant 2 personal foul is a personal foul that involves contact with an opponent that is not only excessive, but also severe (brutal, harsh, cruel) or extreme (dangerous, punishing),while the ball is live. In determining whether a foul has risen to the level of a flagrant 2, officials should consider the following: a) The severity of the contact; b) Whether a player is making a legitimate effort to block a shot. Note that a player may still be assessed a flagrant 2 foul on an attempted blocked shot when there are other factors, such as hard contact to the head or the defender winding up or emphatically following through with the contact. Depending on the nature of the contact, or the result of the contact, this foul also could be considered a flagrant 1 or common personal foul; c) The potential for injury resulting from the contact (e.g., a blow to the head or a foul committed while the player was in a vulnerable position). Depending on the nature of the contact, or the result of the contact, the foul also could be considered a flagrant 1 or common personal foul; d) Any contact by the offending player to the groin area of an opponent which is not clearly accidental; and e) Any foul similar to the foul described in Rule 4-15.2.c.1.g in which the contact, or the result of the contact, is not only excessive but also severe or extreme. Note: The above acts represent examples of potential flagrant 2 fouls. Other acts may also qualify, if they meet the criteria of being not only excessive but also severe or extreme.