SUOrangeSU
All Conference
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,247
- Like
- 8,152
Damn, no bias, but if I'm a top 50 kid and sees JB rotations and sees all the minutes players are playing, I would be jumping to come here
Maybe if Thorpe had been healthy, he would have played more and not decided it wasn't worth being patient and earning the substantial third guard minutes that were almost certainly there for him.Well, maybe if he played Thorpe more than 5 minutes a game during the non-conference schedule so we had a true 3 guard rotation, he wouldn't have transferred, and we wouldn't be relying on a little kid (Washington) who has played about 30 minutes all season.
Maybe if Thorpe had been healthy, he would have played more and not decided it wasn't worth being patient and earning the substantial third guard minutes that were almost certainly there for him.
That said, I think Thorpe's minutes would have come largely at Howard's expense, which may have had Howard looking over his shoulder and not blossoming to the extent he has. So I'm not sure this team would be better off had Thorpe remained, especially since I think Washington is (or can be) a serviceable third guard.I think this is much closer to the truth in regards to Thorpe. Tough break for him, but it is what it is.
I think this year JB will play him situationally when he deems he is healthy enough to do so (just as he often did with DaJuan Coleman), while being careful not to squeeze the lemon dry.HW is a headscratcher, but to me, Sidibe is the big story here. If he's so injured that he can only play emergency minutes, then he should've redshirted. I realize he may have ultimately made decision not to, but still. If he's healthy enough to play, there's no reason he shouldn't of played at least a few minutes last night. I get Chukwu was playing well, but Sidibe shows a lot more promise to me. The game just seems to come more naturally to him. He just needs more reps, and it's not happening unfortunately.
I agree. I think maybe Sidibe's also made it clear he doesn't plan on being here 4 years so wasting a year of eligibility isn't as big a deal. I just want to see the big guy healthy and contributing.I think this year JB will play him situationally when he deems he is healthy enough to do so (just as he often did with DaJuan Coleman), while being careful not to squeeze the lemon dry.
That's exactly right. I'm quite certain JB actually believes that playing HW for 2 minutes in each half will likely result in a loss. And I'm not being sarcastic, thus no need for the font.
I don't believe he's correct. But he's the coach and I'm just a loser on the interwebs (props to Townie!).
It sounds like the decision to not take the redshirt was Sidibe's, since his injuries are not completely debilitating. I think he will be a tremendous player when fully healthy and give the team a nice offensive presence in the low post.I agree. I think maybe Sidibe's also made it clear he doesn't plan on being here 4 years so wasting a year of eligibility isn't as big a deal. I just want to see the big guy healthy and contributing.
So are you saying we should out smart the competition and play 15 players.
What do you expect Battle to say? Man I'm sucking wind out there but the old man won't give me a breather!So it's a thing because YOU think it's a thing. The fact that Battle denies it proves your point.
The answer is - it depends. It depends on the other team's ball movement. Teams that are well-coached and know how to enter the post and quickly reverse the ball for 30 seconds is enough to gas anybody. The way BC tried to attack the zone allowed our players to rest quite a bit. It varies from game to game. But it does give fodder to the complaints that they stand around on offense too much. Maybe they are just gassed from chasing the ball on defense?Nice!!! I love the fact you are still picking up kids half your age from baseline to baseline.. I really do! Kudos. I just think man takes way more effort but agree to disagree not a big deal
I mean... it has to be addressed, right?
I am of the opinion that it is not a coincidence that Battle/Howard/Brissett looked All-ACC after some time off.
I am also of the opinion that it is completely ridiculous in a game where we were up double digits for pretty much the entirety, that we couldn't get a sub in for either of those 3 until one minute left in the game, and even then, only Howard comes out.
With Moyer getting hurt, I get why Marek played all game and with Sidibe's status seemingly "Emergency Center" going into every game, I also understand Chukwu...but c'mon... we can't get breathers for our Big 3 in a blowout win?
What do you expect Battle to say? Man I'm sucking wind out there but the old man won't give me a breather!
They get a breather every 4 minutes, plus halftime.
I did say this thread delivered, but I think some of you could've had a slightly better performance if you were a little more rested. Not naming any names
If you want to throw that argument at me on the football board, ok fine. Not here on the basketball board. We have recruiting pipelines, good players nearby, a brand name program, an iconic Dome that seats 30k plus and some of the best facilities in CBB.
If we hit a little bit better on recruits, we would've been a consistent top 25 program, even with the sanctions. It isn't due to lack of interest.. we've made some bad decisions on the recruiting trail and coupled with sanctions, its hurt us lately.
Props to JB for the recent Final 4's but it's ok to have discussion about this stuff.
Now we're coming out of it, a nice recruiting class lined up and there is zero reason Syracuse Basketball should ever be a consistently mediocre ACC Basketball program. This is not CFB with the power shift to the Southeast and an impossible to compete with arms race.
Didn't work that way last night, which is why you saw Marek reach in and get a foul in the middle of the second half. The under 8 timeout didn't happen until under 7...
Good Players Nearby - What do you think is "Nearby"? Buffalo is nearby. Philadelphia isn't. DC definitely isn't. We here are 4 hours from UNC and 7 hours from Syracuse. Besides, if geographic proximity to BB talent was all that important, Rutgers would be a powerhouse.
I hope you are right on the ability oif the program to keep om keeping on. BUT:
Recruiting Pipeline - I don't know what recruiting "pipeline" means. We'll continue to get good recruits s long as SU is an attractive place to come to play. But there isn't any residual affect that says, "I'm going to SU because other kids from my school or my town have gone there in the past."
It means your assistant coaches/head coach have inroads into the high schools/AAU programs and the ability to meet with these kids and have coaches speak favorably about the school.
Good Players Nearby - What do you think is "Nearby"? Buffalo is nearby. Philadelphia isn't. DC definitely isn't. We here are 4 hours from UNC and 7 hours from Syracuse. Besides, if geographic proximity to BB talent was all that important, Rutgers would be a powerhouse.
Philly/Baltimore/NYC are all nearby geographically speaking. In football, the majority of big time players are from the Deep South or South Florida.
An "Iconic" Dome - It's a football stadium and we play against one of the end zones. It doesn't seem to be that great an advantage to the football team that it was designed for.
30k+ and huge crowds is definitely an advantage for Syracuse and the Dome, basketball speaking.
What SU does have is a "Brand Name" and history and tradition and a large fan base.
And then there is Boeheim. Once he leaves, we'll see what a "brand name" is worth. Georgetown has a "brand name" too. They are struggling mightily
Have to see who we hire. We are also in an infinitely better place than G'Town with our ACC affiliation.