I'm wondering whether Fairman and Maltz were experiments. Fairman was a bear on offense last year. He could play anywhere on the offensive side of the ball. Maltz was an excellent sniper. Maybe Tillman decided to make an early assessment in a game he calculated he could win. If he needed to, he could have moved both players back to their previous positions.
To me, the game was not as close as the score indicated. Md lost 3 goals on crease violations. Two seemed questionable calls. Md appeared faster and stronger, better on the ground, better defensively. I have not seen the stats, but Phaup did not seem as dominant as some posters remarked. Aviles is a mystery. He covered tough mids easily, was fast to the ball and carried very well his first year. Now he seems a shadow of himself. Curry struggled to throw the ball in the ocean, a problem throughout his career, but he faced excellent longs who doubled him very often. He is not a selfish player. I have the feeling the coaches told him to attack the goal. He was out there the whole game.