That's the kind of out-of-the-box thinking that we need. I also hope they consider possible future expansion to seating capacity when engineering this thing (assuming we're losing seats). Am I the only one that hates the idea of reducing capacity? It's one thing if we were going from 100k down to 80k, or even 80 to 60... or 60 to 53. But we're already in the 40s -- that's on par with Alumni Stadium for cripes' sake. When the team was exciting there was significant demand. Are we assuming we'll never be a top 25 team again? If we could avg 48-49 in our peak years with an aging outdated dome, I'm sure we can make a case that we can reach that again or eclipse it with shiny new facilities and better squads.