Class of 2018 SF Cole Swider (RI) Transferring from Villanova to Syracuse

[dasher]

This is kind of a catch-22, no?

If our forwards all end up being good, then missing out on Bazley/Swider isn't a huge deal because we have talent there already. If our forwards suck, Bazley/Swider will have an obvious path to playing time, so the "log jam" won't be a big deal.

Swider has a completely different skill set than all of our forwards right now, so I don't see that as an issue. However, his differing skillset might not be enough to get him here if Brissett/Marek are both as good as advertised, because then we'd have no PT. But then missing out on Swider isn't a huge loss since we have 2 studs at the 3/4 already.

We have to sign them early. Before they know how good these kids are. Or aren't.

 

[O-pulse]

I feel like they would complement one another's games. I can see them playing together; giving us inside-out offensive between the interplay between the 2 players. I'd like to see us ink both!

 

[IthacaMatt]

Shooting form looks like Andy Rautins

He's going to have to get faster with his release.

 

[jordville]

 

[jordville]

 

[007]

Swider's ability to shoot the 3 and put it on the floor is going to make him a very hot commodity, if he isn't already. Speed and quickness was probably a concern going into the summer circuit. I think he is answering those concerns.

 

[Cusefan0307]

I don't care what position he plays. You can't turn this kid down. He's a better shooter than anyone we have right now.

 

[jordville]

A few paragraphs on Swider...
He left out Syracuse though... :noidea:

 

[SUFan44]

Really wanted this one but it ain't happening.

 

[cuseinseattle]

Really wanted this one but it ain't happening.

Could you elaborate on that

 

[CaptainJ]

OttoinGrotto was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.

"That's some catch, that Catch-22," he observed.

"It's the best there is," jdubs30 agreed.

OttoinGrotto saw it clearly in all its spinning reasonableness. There was an elliptical precision about its perfect pair of parts that was graceful and shocking, like good modern art, and at times OttoinGrotto wasn't quite sure that he saw it at all, just the way he was never quite sure about good modern art...

Brother, that was awesome! I think I want some of what you ingested before writing that. Whatever it was, please do it again. (Im being serious)

 

[OttoinGrotto]

Brother, that was awesome! I think I want some of what you ingested before writing that. Whatever it was, please do it again. (Im being serious)

I can't take credit for that, that's my favorite part of the book Catch-22 by Heller.

 

[jordville]

Swider highlights from this past weekend...

 

[CaptainJ]

I can't take credit for that, that's my favorite part of the book Catch-22 by Heller.

I havent read that book, but it sounds like one I would enjoy! You have inspired me, however, to likely watch the new Brad Pitt film War Machine, tonight. I think it is supposed to deliver a similar message/style, and be Pitt's first historically realistic war film, unlike the garbage Hollywood blockbusters. I wonder if Catch 22 would tick off people if it were realeased today due to the dumbed down populace, the way that War Machine has(per some of the IMDB reviews Ive read)?

Anyhow, thanks for that. You seem to have a way to get me thinking about things. (Speaking of which, wasnt the original use of "catch 22" in here used a bit differently than usual?)

 

[OttoinGrotto]

I havent read that book, but it sounds like one I would enjoy! You have inspired me, however, to likely watch the new Brad Pitt film War Machine, tonight. I think it is supposed to deliver a similar message/style, and be Pitt's first historically realistic war film, unlike the garbage Hollywood blockbusters. I wonder if Catch 22 would tick off people if it were realeased today due to the dumbed down populace, the way that War Machine has(per some of the IMDB reviews Ive read)?

Anyhow, thanks for that. You seem to have a way to get me thinking about things. (Speaking of which, wasnt the original use of "catch 22" in here used a bit differently than usual?)

Definitely read the book, Captain J. I have a feeling you'll really enjoy it. It's really funny, and the humor sets up some very powerful revelations later.

I believe Heller coined the term in his book, so his original definition is the correct one.

 

[CaptainJ]

Definitely read the book, Captain J. I have a feeling you'll really enjoy it. It's really funny, and the humor sets up some very powerful revelations later.

I believe Heller coined the term in his book, so his original definition is the correct one.

Wow, I didnt know that. To be clear, I was referring to however the person you replied to used it. I dont even recall exactly now. I've added it to my Amazon Wish List(tm). I wish I could add a link to said Amazon Wishlist like strippers do on their instagrams or f***books or whatever, hoping that johns will buy them the things on it. Sometimes I wish I was a chick. Again, I appreciate your information and inspiration. I hope I never have to write a "DickinMichigan" thread about you, please dont leave this site.

 

[orange79]

Definitely read the book, Captain J. I have a feeling you'll really enjoy it. It's really funny, and the humor sets up some very powerful revelations later.

I believe Heller coined the term in his book, so his original definition is the correct one.

He did, but the term went through several iterations before '22' was settled upon. The book was originally titled Catch-18, but either the publisher or Heller's agent asked him to change it so it wouldn't get confused with another book that was out at the same time. Catch-17 was used but rejected so it wouldn't be confused with Stalag 17, a movie out then.

 

[OttoinGrotto]

He did, but the term went through several iterations before '22' was settled upon. The book was originally titled Catch-18, but either the publisher or Heller's agent asked him to change it so it wouldn't get confused with another book that was out at the same time. Catch-17 was used but rejected so it wouldn't be confused with Stalag 17, a movie out then.

That's cool, didn't know that.

 

[ssbriefcase]

He did, but the term went through several iterations before '22' was settled upon. The book was originally titled Catch-18, but either the publisher or Heller's agent asked him to change it so it wouldn't get confused with another book that was out at the same time. Catch-17 was used but rejected so it wouldn't be confused with Stalag 17, a movie out then.

Swider guys, Swider. lol

 

[justgold315]

Swider guys, Swider. lol

Swider is going to be #22 for cuse?

 

[ssbriefcase]

Swider is going to be #22 for cuse?

Hey, he can be 17,18, or 22, as long as he's coming

 

[721Comstock]

Hey, he can be 17,18, or 22, as long as he's coming

That's the catch!

 

[orange79]

Swider guys, Swider. lol

Yep, my bad. One hour ban.



For you, for pointing it out.

 

[GooseMutt]

Swider is going to be #22 for cuse?

Hope you're right. Our only guarantee for 18 is Buddy. I'm not feeling warm and fuzzy about anyone as a guarantee

 

[rrlbees]

Hope you're right. Our only guarantee for 18 is Buddy. I'm not feeling warm and fuzzy about anyone as a guarantee

Why would buddy be a guarantee? I don't think it'll be an easy decision for dad or son.