IthacaMatt
Old Timer / Unofficial Contributor for 25+ years
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 24,386
- Like
- 36,045
You lost all credibility with this last statement. We rarely compete with UConn? Do you follow recruiting at all?
2014: UConn really wanted McCullough
2015: UConn really wanted Richardson and Diagne
2016: UConn really wanted Battle
In the last 3 recruiting classes, we competed with UConn for literally half (4 of 8) of our commits.
And this 2017 class is extremely important, if we want to establish ourselves as the unquestioned NCAAB team in the Northeast. Losing these critical NYC kids to UConn or MD or whoever would not be a good look.
Hey, I'm sorry I "lost all credibility with you" over that statement. I take a much longer view than you. Over the years, the few big time recruiting battles we got into with them included Rudy Gay, a long time ago. Was UConn a finalist for any of those guys listed above? They might have wanted people, but I don't recall any of those guys being there at the end when their classes were decided.
If you look at who they have taken in their last 4 classes, I don't think there is a single one of those guys that we were after. That's what matters, not who makes somebody's early list when they list every top 50 player - especially UConn, where Ollie seems to put out 20 or more offers per year. We are much more selective in who we recruit. You see it in the number of offers we have outstanding; it's not very many. We focus on guys we identify and we stick to them for a long time. UConn casts a wider net; that doesn't mean that they get any better or any worse players than us. It's just what is.
So, no, I don't see many of their guys in their last 4 classes who were guys we really focused on.